Video assignment | Applied Sciences homework help

 

The assignments allow for a fun take on the concepts reviewed in this course. Videos snippets from popular television programs and movies will be viewed and students will post a response to the videos based on the course and their personal experiences.

Video Assignment #2

Instructions:

Review the two popular video clips from the television shows The Office and Parks. Provide a response to them, and be sure to focus on answering the following questions when typing your response:

  • 1-What does it take to be a good patient and contribute to the quality improvement of health at a doctor’s office? Be sure to leverage details from the provided videos as a springboard for your response.
  • 2- If you were the providers, of the patients, describe how you would have responded to their behavior? Be sure to use the concepts from the course textbook to justify your reply.

Your response should be at minimum 200 words long (but each submission can be longer). Also, students should feel free to discuss more than simply answering the above questions. Prior to submitting the assignment, students are encouraged to type their submission in MS Word to assure the minimum word count is met, and the entry is free of grammatical errors.

Literature Review- Psychology Paper

 It is now time to take that research and begin working on your Intervention Proposal on the Psychology of disaster preparedness (scenario attached). One of the main components of an intervention proposal is the literature review. This week you will be drafting a portion of the literature review. Choose three to four articles that include in a mini literature review that you will build on to complete your Intervention Proposal. These articles should all be recent (published within the past 10 years). You should also cite other material (e.g., seminal works about the theories) as appropriate.

In your literature review:

State your thesis statement that is your professional opinion.

Briefly explain the organization of the paper. For example, if there is a major controversy in this literature, briefly describe the controversy and state that you will present research supporting first one side, and then the other. Or, if three methodologies have been used to address the question, briefly describe them and then state that you will compare the results obtained by the three methods.

Begin by broadly discussing the literature. Then, narrow your review to the studies that are most related to your research question. Your literature review should resemble a funnel – wide (broad) at the top and narrow (focused) at the bottom.

Ensure that at least one article (but no more than two) supports the opposing side to your thesis.

Describe studies in enough detail that the reader has a general sense of the study’s hypothesis, methods, and findings.

Evaluate the studies. Do not provide article summaries; rather, provide descriptive and scholarly evaluations of the research.

Discuss implications of studies (i.e., your judgment of what the studies show and where to go from here). It is common (and often better) to combine the description and evaluation sections. If you do combine them, do not forget to evaluate them.

State your conclusion that reaffirms your professional opinion.

The literature review must be four to six pages, excluding title and reference pages, and it must be formatted according to APA style.

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Literature Review- Psychology Paper appeared first on Psychology Homework.

1. Identify the population and sample type in this study. Is the sample representative? Why or why not? 10 points

Using the referenced article attached, please answer the following questions.
 
Using SHORT ANSWER or bullet format, respond to the following questions related to the BMI article assigned.
1. Identify the population and sample type in this study. Is the sample representative? Why or why not? 10 points
2. Identify all key constructs in this study. Identify ALL varables as independent, dependent, confounding, discrete, nominal, ordinal interval, ratio, quantitative, qualitative, et. al….include ALL appropriate descriptors for each variable. 30 points
3. Did the authors discuss reliability and validity? If so, what were they describing, and what were their comments? 10 points
4. Describe and critique all data displays in this article. What was clear, and what factors might have been less clear? Was the appropriate type of data display sued for the level of the variables? 25 points
5. What descriptive statistics were used? List all and briefly describe. 25 points

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Project management group case study#6

For a Project Management class, but answers should be from the Project Manager perceptive.

Read the case study in the attached PDF file and answer the 5 questions in the attached instructions file. At least 50 words for each answer.

NO PLAGIARISM

I need ORIGINAL work only.

Please, find the attached files for instructions.

You will need to delete the answer file after I download it.

Thank you