4 part question

(TCO 5, 6) Identify and analyze the Third Russian Revolution of 1928-1929. Use historical examples to support your answer. In what ways was the Third Revolution as significant as the first two revolutions of 1917? How successful were Stalin s collectivization policies and the first Five-Year Plan by 1932-33?

Compare and contrast German Nazism and Stalin’s Soviet Communism (Stalinism). What were the similarities and differences between these two political ideologies? Use historical examples to support your answer.

Identify and describe two causes of the Second World War. Then analyze significant ways in which World War II changed the world. Make sure you use enough historical details to support your answer.

(TCO 1, 2) Analyze how nationalism and imperialism contributed to the outbreak of World War I. Use historical examples to support your answer. Of the various causes of World War I, which do you think was the most important, and why?

These only need to be short answers to answer the question.. no more than 200 words! I need it done within 1 hour and 30 minutes

Thanks!

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

【最大1万円クーポン12/11 2時まで】【法人限定】 掲示板 900×600mm ピンマグ両用 小型 木目 木枠 ボード オフィス 業務用 TKB-W609 ルキット オフィス家具 インテリア:LOOKIT オフィス家具 インテ

最大1万円クーポン12 11 2時まで 法人限定 掲示板 900×600mm ピンマグ両用 小型 木目 木枠 ボード オフィス 業務用 TKB-W609 ルキット オフィス家具 インテリア
レビューを記入で次回使える最大2000円割引クーポンGET
商品番号:OCKdD-KTKB-W609

価格 12,060円当店通常価格 32,120円

配送には法人名・屋号が必須です

1〜2週間で出荷予定

カラー
オフホワイト
アイボリー
スモークグレー
パールピンク
ライトグレー
ライトベージュ
ソフトミントグリーン
パウダーブルー
ライトブラウン
ライトメジューム
ライトグリーン
グリーン
クールグレー

レビュー&メール報告でゲット【クーポンor選べる豪華特典】
選べる豪華特典(メールで指定)
次回使える最大2000円OFFクーポン

12345678910

 カートに加える

Billy’s strayhorn sexuality | History homework help

I would like to research the works of Billy Strayhorn. What intrigues me the most regarding Billy Strayhorn is his willingness to be open about his sexuality in such a rough time period. Also, he had a strong friendship with Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and was a part of the movement to racial justice. Bayard Rustin was a main force in the project that grew Dr. King’s impact but yet he does not receive his recognition because of him being gay. Being a gay man and in a new relationship it has been difficult learning to be more open regarding my private life because of the mindset that is attached to the Black community when it comes to religion, and this is in 2021. As a Black, christian man and in a same-sex relationship, I have came to the interpretation that God does not judge off sin. I am aware of God’s unconditional love, and that is what solidifies my opinion. I believe that he judges off your personal relationship with him, completing your mission on Earth, the art of always being a good person, and utilizing love instead of hate. Hopefully, researching more on these profound, courageous Black men will aid me on my journey. 

M8a1: final capstone research paper | LA498 capstone | Excelsior College

Topic:  The effects of Social media on interpersonal communications ethics 

Note: As we outlined in Module 7, all of your previous work serves as the construction materials from which this final research paper is built. The sequence of activities for creating your final paper that we recommended last week is repeated here. Be prepared to edit, rearrange, and rewrite your paper multiple times. The final integrated paper will probably be 4,500-6,000 words. Note that it is due on Wednesday rather than at the final Sunday (11:59 PM ET). This will enable your instructor to prepare your final paper for use in both final course grading and competency scoring within the window provided by the College.

Instructions: Begin by organizing your work in the order of the scaffolded assignments: Research Proposal, Literature Review, Diversity and Ethics. Add to those the transcript of your oral presentation as well as copies of the feedback and suggestions provided by faculty and classmates. Make sure you have APA citation information for all the additional scholarly sources you’ve gathered since your initial Literature Review.

Create a new document to hold the sections for your final paper. You should be ready to finalize those section headings now. You cannot simply insert minor changes to the original papers. Each draft section must be thoroughly revised and rewritten to incorporate the feedback provided as well as additional scholarly sources necessary to fully support your thesis. Your revised work must reflect clear evidence of improved research, writing, analysis, synthesis, and argument development skills.

Begin your document by drafting a working thesis for your final paper. Be prepared to edit after you’ve completed all sections of the final paper. Leave your introduction section empty for now. (As E.M. Forster said, “How do I know what I think until I see what I say?”)

  1. Copy/paste in your revised/rewritten Literature Review. Your revised work must present a comprehensive overview of the contemporary research studies and other recent scholarly articles examining the topic approved by your instructor (a minimum of 7-9 relevant scholarly articles in this final version). If appropriate, your review may also include a limited number of discipline-specific reports from industry or government agencies. When using industry-related sources, be mindful of the potential bias involved and examine that in your review. Include additional scholarly sources as needed with appropriate citations. We expect you to expand the sources from your original Literature Review with other peer-reviewed sources specific to diversity and ethics.
  2. Draft a transition to move the reader from your Literature Review to your Diversity and Ethics section. Be sure you state the problem you are examining and its significance.
  3. Copy/paste in your revised/rewritten Diversity and Ethics paper. Be sure you touch on all the required elements of that scaffold step, but be prepared to move the information around. Possibly some of what you wrote will work better in the introductory or concluding sections of the final paper, and that’s fine, so long as it’s covered! The resulting section will summarize who’s affected by the problem, key differences found in your examination of multiple perspectives, and the significance of such differences. 
  4. Draft a transition to move the reader from your Diversity and Ethics section to your final section.
  5. Write a final, new section in which you advocate the most equitable solution to the problem examined. Draw upon the scholarly sources in your previous sections to substantiate your position. If necessary, provide further support with government reports and studies as well as non-governmental organizational reports and studies.
  6. Based on the work you’ve developed thus far, review and revise your working thesis.
  7. Draft a comprehensive introduction for your paper. Your original Research Proposal could be helpful here.
  8. Draft a conclusion that fully wraps up all themes and ideas presented in all the sections.
  9. Draft an Abstract that provides a preview of the entire paper in about a paragraph.
  10. Build your comprehensive reference list in correct APA format.

The result of these steps should be a very rough draft of your final paper. As you further revise and refine it, keep in mind this basic framework that your final submission should follow:

The final submission you work on and submit on the final Wednesday should follow this basic framework:

  • Abstract
  • Introduction (250-300 words)
    • Provide overview with significance of the issue related to field of study
  • Literature Review (1,000-1,500 words)
    • Build upon Scaffold Step #3
    • Conclude this section with concise statement of the problem based upon the literature
  • Diversity & Ethics
    • Cultural perspectives & inequities (1,000-1,200 words)
      • Analyze competing entities including disenfranchised/vulnerable groups
      • Address issues such as ingroup favoritism, intergroup bias, etc. 
      • Integrate Hofstede’s cultural dimensions theory in analyzing perspectives
      • Summarize cultural perspectives and perceived inequities
    • Ethical implications (1,000-1,200 words)
      • Analyze decision making and actions, social responsibility, applying specific ethical theories
      • Identify possible pathways to equitable solutions
      • Summarize compelling ethical issues
    • Proposed solution (1,000-1,500 words)
      • Advocate most equitable, ethical solution to meet needs of vulnerable, disenfranchised
      • Draw upon scholarly sources & previous sections to substantiate position
      • Provide further support with government reports & studies, NGO reports & studies
    • Conclusion (250-300 words)
    • Reference list

Compose your work in a .doc or .docx file type using a word processor (such as Microsoft Word, etc.) and save it frequently to your computer. For those assignments that are not written essays and require uploading images or PowerPoint slides, please follow uploading guidelines provided by your instructor.

Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to submit your work, click “Submit Assignment” in the upper right corner. Click on “Browse,” browse your computer, and select your file. Click “Open” and verify the correct file name has appeared next to the Browse button. Enter your comments, if any, in the Comments area. Click on “Submit Assignment.”