May 2021 – Page 1341 – Homework Handlers

Unit 8 Assignment 1 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY CONTROVERSIES IN PSYCHOLOGY

May 13, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY: CONTROVERSIES IN PSYCHOLOGY

By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assignment criteria:

Competency 3: Analyze scholarly information and research findings through critical thinking to solve problems in the field of psychology.

State clearly the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.
Provide five article summaries that are succinct and capture the main points of the articles.

Competency 5: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations for professionals in the field of psychology.

Write in a manner that is scholarly in tone, easy to follow, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.
Format five article references according to APA guidelines.

In Unit 9, you will complete and submit your final paper for the course. The topics you may choose from include:

Does cosmetic surgery promote or hinder self-esteem?
Does use of electronic technology promote or detract from well-being?
Is medication or are behavioral interventions more effective in treating attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)?
Are virtual teams or traditional teams more effective?
Does online learning or traditional (face-to-face) learning lead to higher academic performance?

In this assignment, you will compile and submit an annotated bibliography of the potential sources you will use for your final paper.
Your annotated bibliography will consist of:

A minimum of five scholarly articles.
The reference for each of the sources you are considering for your paper.
A brief summary of the article.
An explanation of how this source relates to your thesis. Describe how it either supports the thesis of your position or how it presents a counterargument to your thesis.

Submit your annotated bibliography to Turnitin under the Unit 8 assignment link and review your results before submitting it to your instructor for grading.
Refer to the Annotated Bibliography: Controversies in Psychology Scoring Guide to understand how this assignment will be graded and ensure you meet the grading criteria. In addition, you may wish to refer to the Joel Taylor Sample Annotated Bibliography, linked in the Resources.
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click the linked resources for helpful writing information.
Grade Chart

Due Date: End of Unit 8. Percentage of Course Grade: 10%.
Note: Your instructor may also use the Writing Feedback Tool to provide feedback on your writing. In the tool, click on the linked resources for helpful writing information.

CRITERIA
NON-PERFORMANCE
BASIC
PROFICIENT
DISTINGUISHED

Format five article references according to APA guidelines.30%
Does not format five article references according to APA guidelines.
Formats incomplete or inaccurate article references according to APA guidelines.
Formats five article references according to APA guidelines.
Formats five article references according to APA guidelines without errors.

Provide five article summaries that are succinct and capture the main points of the articles.30%
Does not provide five article summaries that are succinct and capture the main points of the articles.
Provides incomplete or inaccurate article summaries and may capture the main points of the articles.
Provides five article summaries that are succinct and capture the main points of the articles.
Provides five or more article summaries that are succinct, well-written, and capture the main points of the articles.

State clearly the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.30%
Does not state clearly the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.
States incompletely or inaccurately the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.
States clearly the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.
Explains the relationship of the article to the thesis in five articles.

Write in a manner that is scholarly in tone, easy to follow, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.10%
Does not write in a manner that is scholarly in tone, easy to follow, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.
Writes in a somewhat scholarly manner, but is sometimes unclear and contains grammatical and spelling errors.
Writes in a manner that is scholarly in tone, easy to follow, and free from grammatical and spelling errors.
Writing is exemplary: scholarly, clear, transitions well between arguments, seamlessly incorporates evidence, and is free of grammatical and spelling errors.

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

analysis study case for principles of management class

May 13, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

please dont write an essay just like answers those question in the paper. using it like a tool when you writing an essay, and analysis this case by your opinion. I am just an ESL student; therefore, you don’t have to write a very academic paper. I just need a easy-for-read paper with clearly ideas.

MLA form and case paper .

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post analysis study case for principles of management class appeared first on Essay Writers.

see instructions 7

May 13, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

APA STYLE

Chapter 12 – Effective Communication: Partnership in Italy

Melissa Chang was asked to travel to Venice, Italy and meet with her company’s partnering company. Preparation for the trip was stressful. Not only had her colleague cancelled their recent trip to Moscow at the last minute, making the US partner look bad, but the Italian partner had made several requests for information which none of Melissa’s colleagues had fulfilled. She learned all of this information upon making phone contact with their office to confirm her travel plans.

After that initial phone call, Melissa was not looking forward to the trip. She felt that her company had not upheld basic business standards, and adding a language barrier to the equation did not make things any smoother. She was very hesitant to make the trip and felt very guarded. She knew her Italian counterparts were frustrated and she could relate to their feelings. However, she also had a job to do – get more work out of them. If things did not get cleared up quickly, they could potentially lose the partnership. Melissa dreaded having to be the one to deliver that piece of news.

Once in Venice and face-to-face with the partners, Melissa quickly realized their source of frustration. From their perspective, the US partner had not upheld their end of the business deal by providing some basic product information. Melissa had that information with her and easily provided the files. She was able to answer all their questions and explain the business process in the US during the first meeting.

The second day of business meetings was even more productive. Melissa noted a change in her Italian counterparts’ disposition when she entered the office that second morning. They were much warmer and willing to sit down and discuss details. By lunch time, Melissa had information showing how much the Italian office had produced and where they were actually outperforming the US parent office. It was clear that their partnership was nowhere near being in jeopardy.

As the week drew to a close, both Melissa and the Italian partners drew up a projected plan for the next fiscal year. Italy was on track to set new sales records. Their requests for information were basic in her opinion, and Melissa was able to provide them accurate details before her departure. While a few of the finer points she did not understand fully due to the language barrier, Melissa felt reassured seeing firsthand how committed they were to the product. She could not find anything that would cause concern for their business transactions going forward. She chuckled to herself thinking how much she had dreaded this trip initially.

The Italians thought Melissa was a top businesswoman. Their appreciation was immeasurable. The president of the Italian office arranged a formal dinner in her honor. All employees attended with their families. Before dessert was served, he toasted Melissa’s professionalism during the entire week. The president noted her empathetic listening skills and ability to relate to their business needs as being critical to their future success. He also praised her for the quick actions and decisiveness she demonstrated during their meetings.

Answer the following questions by applying the concepts learned in Chapter 12. Also, conduct literature reviews on the subject of discussion and use to support your case study answers:

Discuss how Melissa’s communication style impacted the performance of the Italian partners.

What do you think were the primary sources of information prior to Melissa’s visit?

What do you think the primary sources of information will be after Melissa’s visit?

What might account for Melissa’s change in attitude about dealing with the Italian partners after her visit?

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

Buy Custom Nursing Papers

Controversies in Industrial and Organizational Assessment profile

May 13, 2021/in Uncategorized /by admin

Prior to beginning work on this discussion, read Chapter 11 in the text, the articles by Baez (2013), Hogan, Barrett, and Hogan (2007), Morgeson, Campion, and Dipboye (2007), Peterson, Griffith, Isaacson, O’Connell, and Mangos (2011), and the Maximizing Human Potential Within Organizations (Links to an external site.) and Building Better Organizations (Links to an external site.) brochures on the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) website.

Evaluate the MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Reports for Mr. C (Links to an external site.). and Ms. D. (Links to an external site.) For this discussion, you will take on the role of an industrial-organizational psychologist recently awarded a contract to evaluate potential police candidates. The purpose of the evaluations is to determine the psychological capability of the applicants to be certified as police officers in your state. The applicants you are examining are applying for certification and will be vested with a position of public trust. If certified as police officers, the individuals will likely be required at some future time to exercise significant physical strength and undergo high emotional stress. As the examining psychologist, you are required to comment on the applicants’ social comprehension, judgment, impulse control, potential for violence, and/or any psychological traits that might render her or him psychologically at risk to be certified. The state requires that each applicant’s examination include the following elements:

Interview and History: The psychologist must personally interview the applicant and provide a summary of the applicant’s personal, educational, employment, and criminal history.

Required Personality Test: The applicant shall be administered any current standard form of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2) by the licensed psychologist who interviewed the individual, or by a paraprofessional employed by and under the direct control and supervision of that licensed psychologist.

Other Testing Methods: If (after conducting the required test) the licensed psychologist is unable to certify the applicant’s psychological capability or risk to exercise appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer, the psychologist is directed to personally employ whatever other psychological measuring instrument(s) and/or technique(s) deemed necessary to form her or his professional opinion. The use of any such instrument(s) and/or technique(s) requires a full and complete written explanation to the commission.

For the purposes of this discussion, assume the interview and history information reported to you by Mr. C. and Ms. D. is unremarkable and that neither candidate communicated anything to you during the interview that raised concerns about her or his capabilities to exercise appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer. Review the MMP1-2-RF Police Candidate Interpretive Reports for Mr. C. (Links to an external site.) and Ms. D. (Links to an external site.) and evaluate the professional interpretation of this testing and assessment data from an ethical perspective.
In your initial post, communicate your conclusions about Mr. C. and Ms. D., either recommending certification or communicating reservations. After you have made your decision, begin the section on each candidate with one of the following statements, identifying each candidate by name.

To recommend certification: I have examined [insert applicant’s name], and it is my professional opinion that this person is psychologically capable of exercising appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer.
Follow the above statement with a one-paragraph rationale for your conclusion based on the available test results.
Follow the rationale with a brief comparison of any additional assessment instruments you might consider administering beyond the MMPI-2-RF. Debate the pros and cons of the potential use of other assessments. Explain any ethical implications that may arise from the interpretation of this data.

To communicate reservations: I have examined [insert applicant’s name], and it is my professional opinion that this person is psychologically at risk for exercising appropriate judgment and restraint to be certified as a police officer.
Follow the statement with a one-paragraph rationale for your conclusion based on the available test results.
Follow the rationale with a brief comparison of any additional assessment instruments you recommend administering beyond the MMPI-2-RF. Debate the pros and cons of using other assessments. Explain any ethical implications that may arise from the interpretation of this data.