A recent study compared the time spend together by single- and

/in /by

1. A recent study compared the time spend together by single- and dual-earner couples. According to the records kept by the wives during the study, the mean amount of time spent together watching television among the single-earner couples was 61 minutes per day, with a standard deviation of 15.5 minutes.  For the dual-earner couples, the mean number of minutes spent watching television was 48.4 minutes, with a standard deviation of 18.1 minutes.  At the .01 significance level, can you conclude that the single-earner couples on average spend more time watching television together?  There were 15 single-earner and 12 dual-earner couples studied.

2. The null and alternate hypotheses are:

 

A random sample of 20 items from the first population showed a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.  A sample of 16 items for the second population showed a mean of 94 and a standard deviation of 8.  Use the .05 significant level.

 

3. The following hypotheses are given.

 

 

A random sample of five observations from the first population resulted in a standard deviation of 12.  A random sample of seven observations from the second population showed a standard deviation of 7.  At the .01 significance level, is there more variation the first population?

 

4.

“““`

discussion on assault and battery

/in /by

Read the cases of State v. Bolarinho, 850 A.2d 907 (R.I. 2004) and State v. Fleming, 19 S.W.3d 195 (Tenn. 2000). Use your analysis of these cases to inform you in your discussion of the following questions:

Primary Task Response: Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas:

  • Assuming that an assault does not involve physical contact, and battery does in this jurisdiction, in your own words, define the crimes of assault and battery.
  • Can a person’s hands, fists, or feet be considered dangerous weapons? Why or why not?
    • Would the use of hands, fists, or feet be considered mitigating or aggravating factors with regard to assault or battery? Explain.
  • What do you think makes an object a dangerous weapon? Explain.
  • What case law could you use to support your arguments? Identify and describe your examples.
    • Why do you think these cases are relevant to the discussion?

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post discussion on assault and battery appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

Hi i need help with some accounting homework. i do not want the

/in /by

Hi I need help with some accounting homework. I do not want the answers, I need to know how to get the answers. Thanks.

 

 

Carlsville Company, which began operations in 2013, invests its idle cash in trading securities. The following transactions are from its short-term investments in its trading securities.

      

2013  
Jan. 20   Purchased 800 shares of Ford Motor Co. at $26 per share plus a $125 commission.
Feb. 9   Purchased 2,200 shares of Lucent at $44.25 per share plus a $578 commission.
Oct. 12   Purchased 750 shares of Z-Seven at $7.50 per share plus a $200 commission.

    

2014  
Apr. 15   Sold 800 shares of Ford Motor Co. at $29 per share less a $285 commission.
July 5   Sold 750 shares of Z-Seven at $10.25 per share less a $102.50 commission.
July 22   Purchased 1,600 shares of Hunt Corp. at $30 per share plus a $444 commission.
Aug. 19   Purchased 1,800 shares of Donna Karan at $18.25 per share plus a $290 commission.

      

2015  
Feb. 27   Purchased 3,400 shares of HCA at $34 per share plus a $420 commission.
Mar. 3   Sold 1,600 shares of Hunt at $25 per share less a $250 commission.
June 21   Sold 2,200 shares of Lucent at $42 per share less a $420 commission.
June 30   Purchased 1,200 shares of Black & Decker at $47.50 per share plus a $595 commission.
Nov. 1  Required:

1.

Prepare journal entries to record these short-term investment activities for the years shown. (Ignore any year-end adjusting entries.)

Sold 1,800 shares of Donna Karan at $18.25 per share less a $309 commission.

 

Individual Right Versus the Collective Good

/in /by

Individual Right Versus the Collective GoodMost of the recent successes in improving the public’4 s health has had to address the tension of individual rights versus the collective good. Anti-smoking campaigns and laws banning smoking in public places protect people from the negative health effects of second-hand smoke, yet some believe that they infringe on the individual rights of those who choose to smoke.This tension also exists in the allocation of scarce resources, from providing adequate staff coverage to making decisions about the amount of health care to provide. Given the nurse’s involvement in policy and health care delivery, it is important to understand the dynamics of this tension, as well as the legal and ethical implications.Requiring childhood immunizations has helped prevent diseases such as polio and measles, but some parents assert that they have the right to decide if being immunized is in the best interest of their children.
select one example of timely health care policy that allows you to evaluate the tension between individual rights and the collective good. Conduct additional research as necessary using credible websites and the Walden Library.When  have you encountered a tension between the individual right and the  collective good in your nursing practice?With information from the Learning Resources in mind, consider relatively recent examples of health care policy that demonstrate this tension.