CheckPoint Calculating Fixed Costs, Variable Costs, and Break-Even Point for a Program Calculate the

CheckPoint

Calculating Fixed Costs, Variable Costs, and Break-Even Point for a Program

Calculate the fixed cost, variable costs, and break-even point for the program suggested in Appendix D.

Base your calculations on the financial data for 2002.

Post your final answers as a Microsoft Word attachment.

Document Preview:

C H A P T E R 11 Setting Fees Fee setting can be operationally defined as the process of determining how much an agency will charge for its products and services. Fees are usually established in one of two ways. Afee can be set on a per output (or unit-of-service) basis, or else on a per client or per participant basis. Whereas cost accounting standards and guidelines exist for the purposes of determining the full cost, or total cost, of a human service program (a major ongoing agency activity) or other agency activity (e.g., training program, workshop, seminar, special events), no comparable standards or guidelines exist for setting fees. Consequently, fee setting is as much an art as it is a science. The process of fee setting requires that human service administrators apply a variety of financial management concepts and techniques, as well as professional judgment, to determine a fee or fees that best serve the interests of clients, participants, the program or activity, and the agency. Afee can be equal to, greater than, or less than the full cost of a human service program or other agency activity. For example, if a human service program is a revenue center, its fee might be set equal to its full cost. However, if the program is a profit center, its fee would probably be greater than the full cost. If a human service program or other agency activity uses variable fees or a sliding fee scale based on the economic circumstances of clients or participants, the fees paid by at least some clients will be less than the full cost. This chapter discusses several major fee setting issues that human service administrators routinely consider when setting fees for programs and other agency activities. Acase example (a child and family benefits seminar) is then used to demonstrate how these various fee setting issues might be dealt with. Again, the point is stressed that no hard and fast rules exist for fee setting. Rather, fees are arrived at on the basis of the financial…

Attachments:

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post CheckPoint Calculating Fixed Costs, Variable Costs, and Break-Even Point for a Program Calculate the appeared first on Nursing Assignment.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


wireshark 2

Scan your home network with Wireshark, take screenshot of the some of traffic, then open one of the packets and describe what you see. Tell me what the device/site the traffic is coming from and going to and describe what protocols are being used. Take a screenshot of the packet you are describing and be sure to expand everything in the middle window so I can see what you are describing.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post wireshark 2 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


bul3130 critical legal thinking case study 2

Draft your response using the format found in the Example CLTCA Submission with APA Format.

Ron supervises delivery of flowers for a wholesale distributor of fresh flowers, Flowers. Inc. In order to accommodate one of the company’s best customers, Ron offers to immediately rush a delivery of fresh peonies. All of the delivery trucks are currently out on delivery. Ron directs an employee, Ruth, to use her own vehicle to deliver the flowers.

Ruth carelessly parks her car on a steep hill, leaving the car in neutral and failing to engage the parking brake. The car rolls down the hill, knocking down an electric line. The sparks from the broken line ignite a grass fire. The fire spreads until it reaches a gasoline station one mile away. There is a tanker truck off-loading gasoline to the station’s gas tanks. The fire ignites the gasoline being pumped into the tanks, and one of the tanks explodes, causing part of the station structure to fall on and injure a passing motorist, Jim.”

Can Jim recover damages from Ruth; from Flowers’ Inc? Why or why not?
Identify the cause of action. Discuss each element of the cause of action, and relate them to your assessment of whether Jim has a cause of action against Ruth.
Discuss the legal doctrine under which Jim might also recover from Flowers, Inc.


Textbook: Managers and the Legal Environment Strategies for Business by Constance E. Bagley, 9th Edition covering Chapters 9, 10, and 14.


Critical Legal Thinking Case Study Rubric

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRecognize the applicable areas of law

12.5 to >11.24 pts

Excellent

Correctly states each area of applicable law

11.24 to >9.99 pts

Good

Correctly states all but one area of applicable law

9.99 to >8.74 pts

Average

Correctly states most of the areas of applicable law

8.74 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Misstates the areas of applicable law

12.5 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the applicable principles of law

25.0 to >22.49 pts

Excellent

Correctly states each element or principle of law

22.49 to >19.99 pts

Good

Correctly states most of the elements or principles of law

19.99 to >17.49 pts

Average

Correctly states some of the elements or principles of law

17.49 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Correctly states only a few of the element or principles of law

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify the key facts

25.0 to >22.49 pts

Excellent

Correctly identifies each of the key facts

22.49 to >19.99 pts

Good

Correctly identifies most of the key facts

19.99 to >17.49 pts

Average

Correctly identifies some of the key facts

17.49 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Correctly identifies only a few of the key facts

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeApply the law to the facts to resolve the issue

25.0 to >22.49 pts

Excellent

States a decision that resolves the issue, supported by application of the elements or principles of law to the facts

22.49 to >19.99 pts

Good

States a decision that resolves the issue, but fails to fully support it by application of the elements or principles of law to the facts

19.99 to >17.49 pts

Average

States a decision that resolves the issue, but fails to support it by application of the elements or principles of law to the facts

17.49 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Fails to state a decision that resolves the issue

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Format; Organization; and grammar, punctuation, and spelling

12.5 to >11.24 pts

Excellent

Good, logical organization with no errors

11.24 to >9.99 pts

Good

Good, logical organization with only one or two errors

9.99 to >8.74 pts

Average

Good, logical organization with several errors

8.74 to >0 pts

Needs Improvement

Confusing organization, or numerous errors

12.5 pts

Total Points: 100.0

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post bul3130 critical legal thinking case study 2 appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


miranda and admissibility of statements 7

Introduction

For a suspect’s statements to be admissible in court, they must meet certain criteria. As you have learned from the Miranda case, in that instance, the Court rejected voluntariness of statements as the sole test for admissibility. Although voluntariness is still required, it is now assumed if three questions can be answered in the affirmative. First, it must be shown that the Miranda warning was given. Second, if it was given, it will be necessary to determine whether there was a waiver. Finally, if there was a waiver, there must be evidence that the waiver was intelligent and voluntary. There are certainly other circumstances when confessions may be admissible when made before Miranda warning is given, which makes this area of law very intricate and fact-based.

You will use the Miranda and Admissibility Statements media as the foundation for your assignment.

Overview

Miranda v. Arizona changed the rules on admissibility from voluntariness to the three-questions test. For this assignment, prepare a three-page paper citing a minimum of two academically verified references.

In your paper:

  • Determine whether you can question the occupants of the vehicle in the scenario at the scene without Miranda warning. (Question 1: Was Miranda warning given?)
  • Analyze, after the Miranda warning was given, whether there was a waiver. (Question 2: If Miranda warning was given, was there a waiver?)
  • Explore whether, assuming there was a waiver by the suspects, the waiver was intelligent and voluntary. (Question 3: If there was a waiver, was it intelligent and voluntary?)
  • Explain how Miranda changed the way police officers perform their jobs.

Be sure to review the Miranda and Admissibility of Statements Scoring Guide to ensure you understand the criteria for this assignment.

Requirements

Your paper should meet the following requirements:

  • Written communication: Must be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
  • References: A minimum of two references.
  • APA format: Format resources and citations as per current APA style and formatting guidelines.
  • Length of paper: Three pages, not including the title page and the references page.
  • Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post miranda and admissibility of statements 7 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”