20 MCQ Strategic Management

20 MCQ in Strategic Managment, due today 25. oct @ 20:00 GMT+1.

 

 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


discussion reply 119

please reply to the following post 100 words one referen
Does regulation promote effective health outcomes and protect the public?

The principles that form the basis for legal interventions by public health agencies and others in government to protect and improve the public’s health include discharging the statutory duty to protect from harm and promote health and safety (Chamberlain, 2018). Some legal interventions are more controversial than others and starkly illustrate the challenge of balancing public goods and individual freedoms due to varying norms/attitudes, expectations, and values that may inform both public opinion and decision-making by legislators in different jurisdictions. Health care regulations and standards are necessary to ensure compliance and to provide safe health care to every individual who accesses the system. The health care regulatory agencies in turn monitor practitioners and facilities, provide information about industry changes, promote safety and ensure legal compliance and quality services (Chamberlain, 2018). The various regulatory bodies protect the public from several health risks and provide numerous programs for public health and welfare. Together, these regulatory agencies protect and regulate public health at every level. Health care regulations are developed and implemented not only by all levels of government (federal, state and local) but by private organizations as well.

Are regulatory bodies accountable to the public?

Professional regulatory bodies are held accountable by the public, the media, government, and other stakeholders for the conduct of their members. Although there is liability protection from legal actions provided for in their enabling statute, professional regulatory bodies are blamed when there is serious misbehavior on the part of a member of the profession and governments do intervene when professional regulatory bodies are seen not to carry out their public protection mandate (Oyetunde & Brown, 2014). For professional regulatory bodies, success is the extent to which potential harms to the public and users of the professional service have been reduced, suppressed, mitigated or eliminated, and that the government, the public and other stakeholders believe that the professional regulatory body is doing a good job of protecting the public

References

Scaglione, B. J. (2019). Regulatory Compliance. Security Management for Healthcare, 1–24. doi: 10.4324/9780429023705-1

Chamberlain, J. M. (2018). Introduction: professional health regulation in the public interest. Professional Health Regulation in the Public Interest, 1–16. doi: 10.1332/policypress/9781447332268.003.0001

Oyetunde, M. O., & Brown, V. B. (2014). Professional Accountability. JONA’S Healthcare Law, Ethics, and Regulation, 14(4), 109–114. doi: 10.1097/jhl.0b013e318276308f

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post discussion reply 119 appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


final reflection 27

For this queston in the Assignment Sheet.

“If you had to

decide now, which program would you choose as your major as you continue your studies

towards a social sciences degree” I will go Economics. For the university life reflection just like all other normal students.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post final reflection 27 appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


this is an essay about evaluating the elements of theater design about 300 500 words

These are the requirements,Theatre is presenting The Trojan Women:
After watching the performance, you must submit a document that addresses the following points:

Which performance of the show did you attend? (Note there are two performances on Saturdays) (3%)(I saw the show on Tuesday night.)
What did you think of the show, overall? Why? Explain. (5%)
List four technical elements of the performance that, in your opinion, were well executed. Explain your opinion as thoroughly as possible. (8.5% each)
List four technical elements of the performance that, in your opinion, could have been better executed. Explain your opinion as thoroughly as possible. (8.5% each)
List three elements used in the performance that we have discussed in class. For each, name what the element is and explain how it was used. (8% each)

For points 3 and 4, you must focus on technical elements instead of design elements – meaning this is about the execution of a concept, not the concept itself (admittedly, for some items it is hard to make this distinction). Consider elements in scenery, props, lighting, sound and costumes. Items you could discuss include but are not limited to:

Lighting or special effects.
Props and their function.
Specific elements of the scenery and how they function or were constructed.
Execution of specific sound effects or sound in general.

And remember: this is about the execution, not the design. Here are a couple of fictional examples:

There is a piece of scenery that enters and exits.

Stating that this piece of scenery exists or saying it was a good or bad idea to use it is discussing a design choice, and not pertinent to this assignment.
Discussing how this was executed, and how it affected the show in a positive way (the entrances and exits were clean, for example) or a negative way (for instance, an entrance seems to have been missed, the movement of the scenic piece was jerky) and how this affected the telling of the story is a technical note and worth full credit.

All actors in the show are wearing microphones.

Mentioning that the actors are wearing microphones is discussing a design choice, and not pertinent.
Discussing that the balance of the sound of the mics was great, or that an actor could not be heard because their microphone was malfunctioning, are technical notes and the kind of thing this project is about.

Other than item 1 on the list, everything on the project requires explanations. Explaining why an item is listed is where you will earn your grade. When in doubt, explain.
I will send you the documents given by the professor and some short videos and photos I took on the scene. It is very important that you combine the two to answer the above questions.
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”