Three Projects Paper This assignment should result in a well
Three Projects Paper This assignment should result in a well-written, well-organized paper that clearly addresses each of the key requirements of the assignments. The paper must follow APA 6th or 7th edition formatting guidelines. Based on the three identified activities from your planning worksheets, you will write a research-supported academic paper describing each selected project/activity, focusing on the intervention level of, how it demonstrates field core competencies, and a self-reflection on the process. The paper focuses on explaining what the project or activity was and the student’s role, or will explain the research topic and how it relates to the population served by the agency. Define the intervention level and analyze how and why the activity is at that intervention level. Further, explore how the project aligned with one of the core competencies from the Advanced Generalist learning contract (highlight a different one for each activity). The paper will include a self-reflection covering your experience in completing the activity, focusing on the social work skill developed. Video link explaining Intro to Social Work: Understanding Macro, Mezzo, and Micro Levels of Analysis This assignment should result in a well-written, well-organized paper that clearly addresses each of the key requirements of the assignments. The paper must follow APA 6th or 7th edition formatting guidelines. Based on the three identified activities from your planning worksheets 1. Informed Awareness Training/ mezzo intervention/ competency: Engage in Practice-Informed Research and Research-Informed Practice. 2. Government Compensation/ Micro intervention /competency: Advance Human Rights and Social, Economic, and Environmental Justice. 3. Military Discharge upgrade / Micro intervention/ competency: Demonstrating Intervene with Individuals, Families, Groups, Organizations and Communities I will upload; planning worksheet, and other information along with a PowerPoint slide to better assist you. The paper will include an introduction, conclusion, and the following: • A comprehensive description of the project which clearly identifies student role or a description of the research topic and the population served by the agency. • Intervention level: o Identification and description of the level of intervention (micro, mezzo or macro). o An explanation of why/how that project is considered that level of intervention. • Core competencies: o An explanation highlighting one core competency for each activity and how it was demonstrated in the project. Select a different one for each activity. Be detailed and thorough. • Self-reflection: o An explanation of why you chose this project and how this project contributed to your learning experience. Consider covering some of the following when writing about your learning experience: what was the experience like completing the project, what did you observe are your strengths and challenges as a social worker, what went well for you, what was surprising, what was the biggest lesson learned. PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY Objective – Three Projects Paper: You are required to write a research-supported academic paper based on the three activities you identified in your planning worksheets. In this paper you will: 1) describe each selected project/activity; 2) describe and analyze the intervention level of each; 3) describe how it demonstrates field core competencies; and, 4) include self-reflections on the process of undertaking the activity. For this assignment you MUST include the following sections and USE subheaders: Activity 1: (Header) Note there is nothing to write here!! Activity and Role (subheader, repeat for Activity 2 & 3) Include a brief (no more than 1 paragraph) introduction which describes the project/activity and what your role was (note you are writing in PAST tense). Intervention (subheader, repeat for Activity 2 & 3) Define 1) the intervention level; and, 2) analyze how and why the activity was at this intervention level (1-2 paragraphs). Competency (subheader, repeat for Activity 2 & 3) Explore how the project aligned with ONE of the core competencies from the Advanced Generalist learning contract (highlight a different competency for each activity) (1-2 paragraphs). Self-reflection (subheader, repeat for Activity 2 & 3) Reflect on your experience in completing the activity, focusing on YOUR PRACTICE AND SPECIFICALLY, the social work SKILLS developed. (1-2 paragraphs). You will repeat this formatting for Activity 2 and 3 (meaning in total you will have three separate sections organized using the subheaders above). Please review these instructions carefully to ensure that you meet the requirements of the assignment and that you comprehensively address the required components of each section. Failing to organize your paper in this manner and use subheaders will result in a loss in points. You should take a minimum of a paragraph to explain the intervention level and connection to the activity. You should take a minimum of a paragraph to explore the core competencies and how the activity demonstrates the competency. DO NOT number the core competency. Project descriptions should be thorough and focus on your work in the activity. The self-reflection should be focused on your work and experience completing the activity, discussed with insight and thoughtfulness. DO NOT discuss theory on this paper. Three Projects Paper Rubric Three Projects Paper Rubric Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Intervention Level Desciption & Connection 6 to > pts Exemplary Intervention level (micro, mezzo and macro) is identified for each field project with: 1) a description and definition of what the intervention level is and a clear and descriptive explanation of why the project is identified at that intervention level. Explanation of intervention level is academically supported and description of how the project fits at that level is THOROUGH. 5 to > pts Competent Description of intervention level was not included for one or two projects. An explanation of intervention level is missing for one project. Or connections to the field project and the intervention level are tenuous or inaccurate. Intervention level is defined without academic support. Connection between intervention level and project is explained minimally. 2 to >0 pts Insufficient Description of intervention level not included for all three projects. Missing explanation of intervention level and field project for two to three projects. Or the connection between the field projects and the intervention levels are inaccurate. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Core Competencies 6 to > pts Exemplary Analysis of connection to one field core competency is clear for each field project. Connection to project and the selected core competency is evident for each project. Student expanded on the connection between the activity and the core competency THOROUGHLY with detail. 5 to > pts Competent Missing analysis and connection to field core competencies for a field project OR connection between field core competencies is ambiguous, tenuous or is minimally explained OR repeated competencies used. 2 to >0 pts Insufficient Missing connections to field core competencies and Advanced Generalist components for two or three projects. Or connections are inaccurate or not connected to the field learning contract. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Field Project 6 to > pts Exemplary Clear description of each field project which clearly identifies student role in the activity. 4 to > pts Competent Limited or unclear description of the project. 2 to >0 pts Insufficient. No description of the project. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Self-Reflection 6 to > pts Exemplary Exemplary self-reflection component explaining WHY each project was chosen and how each project contributed to learning process. Discussion on insight into experience and what was learned, what skill was developed is evident. 5 to > pts Competent Lack of self-reflection component explaining why each project was chosen and how each project contributed to learning process. 2 to >0 pts Insufficient Limited self-reflection component explaining why each project was chosen and how each project contributed to learning process. 6 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Organziation 3 pts Exemplary No or minor grammar or syntax errors which do not impede understanding of work. Paper was harmonious and integrated, with a unified theme and purpose. Harmony and integration were apparent both within and between paragraphs 2 pts Competent Paper was organized with discernible sections and transitions that helped guide the reader from start to end. A few grammar or syntax errors which impede cohesion and clarity or understanding of work. 1 pts Insufficient Notable grammar and syntax errors making understanding of sections difficult. Paper was not organized and was difficult to follow. 3 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Formatting 3 pts Exemplary No or minor APA errors. Use of headings included. Reference and title page follow APA format. Writing is academically appropriate. Statements are objective. Paper is primarily written in third person. 2 pts Competent A few APA errors. Headings missing or errors in title and reference page. A few missing references. Paper includes multiple uses of first person writing outside self-reflection section. Paper was too short by a page or too long by more than a few paragraphs. An introduction and/or conclusion were missing. 1 pts Insufficient Significant APA errors. No use of headings. Title and reference page not in APA format. 3 pts Total Points: 30
The post Three Projects Paper This assignment should result in a well appeared first on homework handlers.
