In your essay discuss three relevant Registered Nurse Standards for Practice (2016).

In your essay discuss three relevant Registered Nurse Standards for Practice (2016).

Critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills are used every day in practice by Registered Nurses. The aim of this essay task is for you to apply the eight stages of the clinical reasoning cycle (Levett-Jones et al., 2010) to discuss and reflect on a clinical decision. Familiarisation with the clinical reasoning cycle will support you to provide safe quality care as a Registered Nurse. Task Instructions: Write a 2000 word essay which discusses one clinical decision that you have been involved with during a Bachelor of Nursing clinical placement, using all eight stages of the clinical reasoning cycle (Levett-Jones et al., 2010). In this essay your critical reflection on the clinical decision (stage eight) is a significant component of this task (please see weighting in marking criteria). You need to identify a different patient scenario to the one you discussed in your first essay. 1) Analyse how each stage of the clinical reasoning cycle (Levett-Jones et al., 2010) was applied to your decision. 2) In stage eight (8) critically reflect on what you have learnt from applying the clinical reasoning cycle to your chosen decision (you may choose to draw on other models of reflection). 3) In your essay discuss three relevant Registered Nurse Standards for Practice (2016).


 


The post In your essay discuss three relevant Registered Nurse Standards for Practice (2016). appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Description of Data Visualization & compound Visualization in Periodic Table

 “A picture is worth a thousand words” may be a lovely cliché, but it’s exactly the wrong way to view visualization. For this week’s discussion question, please view the Periodic Table of Visualization at the following link (http://www.visual-literacy.org/periodic_table/periodic_table.html). Choose one Data Visualization and one Compound Visualization by placing your mouse cursor over each option. Provide your classmates with a brief description of your choices and explain why you made your choices. Also, describe what advantage do your choices have over the others.

Reference Text book : Kirk, A. (2016). Data visualisation a handbook for data driven design. Los Angeles, CA: Sage. ISBN: 978- 1473912144

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Description of Data Visualization & compound Visualization in Periodic Table appeared first on Nursing Experts Help.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


english 142

ENG 142

Explication Assignment Sheet

 

Rough draft due: Friday, October 16th

Final draft due: Friday, October 23rd

 

Eligible Reading(s):

 

Shakespeare, William. Othello (text version)

–OR–

Select ONE of the poems found between pages 581 and 605 of your textbook (6th edition text)

 

Purpose:

 

An explication is an extended discussion of one particular theme, issue, or literary element within a text. Explications are persuasive (i.e. you need a thesis statement that articulates a specific, debatable claim), and are intended to argue your particular interpretation of a text within the framework of your selected theme, issue, or element. Please locate the “Key Literary Terms” document in week 6 of Moodle for some definitions of literary elements that will assist you in selecting a talking point (or points) for this essay. You will need to provide quoted or paraphrased support for your discussion points within this essay; please be sure to cite your sources with in-text citations and Works Cited page entries. “Outside” sources are not required for this paper, but are encouraged.

 

How Do I Do This?

 

1) Read your chosen text carefully, and select an issue, theme, or literary element(s) at work in the text, and discuss the significance of it.

 

2) You should write approximately 5 pages, not including the Works Cited page.

 

 

Tips:

1)    Remember that an explication is an extended, persuasive discussion: tell your readers how a certain element (theme, issue, etc.) functions in the text.

2)    Begin with a clear, debatable thesis statement and organize your talking points from there.

3)    Use MLA style for your essay formatting and citations.

 

 

 

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


just a one page answer by reading an article provided

Apply the three most important concepts you have learned and how these concepts can be applied by reading the article below: (This just need to be a page answer):
Article:The Trusted Leader
Trust is a vital ingredient in organizations since they represent a type of ongoing relationship. In their book The Trusted Leader, Robert Galford and Anne Seibold Drapeau analyze this important aspect of leadership and offer models for understanding trust and how to build it.
Galford and Drapeau identified three categories of trust within an organization:

Strategic trust – trust in the organization’s mission, strategy, and ability to succeed.

Organizational trust – trust that the organization’s policies will be fairly administered and implemented as stated.

Personal trust – trust that subordinates place in their manager to be fair and to look out for their interests.

In The Trusted Leader, Galford and Drapeau focus primarily on building personal and organizational trust.
Trust reduces unproductive rumors and second guessing that distracts employees from their work. It motivates, stimulates creativity, and helps the organization to attract and retain great employees.

Modeling Trust
Galford and Drapeau offer the following equation to model trust:

Trustworthiness
 = 
C  +  R  +  I
S

where

C = credibilityR = reliability I = intimacyS = self-orientation

These characteristics are described as follows:

Credibility is earned by expertise, by the ability to obtain the required expertise, and by being up-front about one’s limitations.

Reliability is consistency and dependability. Reliable leaders provide a sense of comfort to their subordinates.

Intimacy is not about revealing personal details, but rather, making the business of the organization personal and understanding the sensitivities of others.

Self-orientation is the degree to which one focuses on one’s own concerns when interacting with others. Self-orientation decreases trustworthiness. Those who are motivated by duty or achievement tend to be more self-oriented than those motivated by meaning or who gain pleasure from the work itself.

Enemies of Trust
While the above formula provides some insight, building trust is not an endeavor performed in isolation. Rather, building trust is an effort of defending trust from its enemies. A lone trusted leader cannot succeed in an untrustworthy environment because such a leader will become a target and eventually be brought down.
Galford and Drapeau identified 22 enemies of trust, each of which can be classified in one of the following categories:

Inadequate communication
Misbehavior
Unremedied situations

Building Personal Trust
To build personal trust, Galford and Drapeau present a five stage process:

Engaging – finding common ground and relating to other people, for example, by appreciating the key challenges that employees face in their jobs.

Listening – builds trust by showing that one cares enough to invest the time to listen. Asking thoughtful questions, getting clarification when necessary, and giving one’s complete attention to the conversation all send the message that one cares about the other person.

Framing – making sure that one understands the core of what the other person is conveying, and letting him or her know it.

Envisioning – looking to the future and identifying an optimistic and achievable outcome, and helping the other person to visualize the benefits of that outcome.

Committing – both parties agree and commit to moving toward the envisioned future.

Building Organizational Trust
Organizational trust is based on belief in the way things are done in the organization. While organizational trust requires personal trust in the organization’s leaders on an aggregate basis, it is possible to have an untrustworthy supervisor and still believe in the organization.
Galford and Drapeau identified five variables on which organizational trust depends, as shown in the following equation:

Organizational Trustworthiness
 = 
(A1  +  A2  +  A3)  x  (A4  +  A5)
R

where

A1 = AspirationsA2 = AbilitiesA3 = ActionsA4 = AlignmentA5 = Articulation R  = Resistance

These variables are described as follows:

Aspirations – aspirations provide the incentive for people in the organization to want to trust each other. Aspirations is another term for business vision.

Abilities – are the resources and capabilities required to fulfill the aspirations.

Actions – actually getting to the task and doing what is needed to reach the organizational goals rather than losing focus to the distractions that inevitably will arise.

Alignment – having consistency between aspirations, abilities, and actions.

Articulation – communicating the aspirations, abilities, actions, and alignment so that everybody in the organization knows them and is able to articulate them.

Resistance – building a trusting organization is likely to be met with resistance in the form of skepticism, fear, frustration, and a “we-they” mindset.

In the organizational trust formula, resistance is unique because it stands alone in the denominator; thus it is crucial to minimize it. Galford and Drapeau propose that resistance is best conquered by long-term action designed to directly address the issues behind the resistance.

Recommended Reading
Robert Galford and Anne Seibold Drapeau, The Trusted Leader
The book on which this article is based, The Trusted Leader covers the subject of trusted leadership in-depth with plenty of examples that bring theory to life.
After introducing the theory, the book presents practical advice for situations frequently encountered by senior leaders.
 Table of Contents

Part One:
An Overview of Trusted Leadership

 1. What is trusted leadership?  2. The Trusted Leader Self-Assessment  3. The Characteristics and Competencies of the Trusted Leader  4. The Enemies of Trusted Leadership

Part Two:
Identifying and Applying the Tools of Trusted Leaders

 5. The Tools of Building Personal Trust  6. The Tools of Building Organizational Trust

Part Three: 
How Trusted Leaders Work

 7. From the Top  8. Inside Teams, Departments, Offices  9. Across Teams, Departments, Offices

Part Four:
Defining Moments

 10. In Times of Change  11. When People Leave  12. In Times of Crisis

Part Five:
Building Trust in Perspective

 13. Trust Lost, Trust Rebuilt  14. When You Leave: The Legacy of Trust
 Afterword: The Trusted Leader Continues  Notes and References  About the Authors  Index

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”