three models—behavioral, interpersonal, and self-psychology models. For each of

three models—behavioral, interpersonal, and self-psychology models. For each of these three concepts: Apply a proper APA heading to separate the section. Describe the concept. Identify the theorist associated with the concept. Provide a rationale for why the selected concept is the most applicable from that model. Keep in mind that the object of this assignment is to identify and discuss a specific concept from each model and not to focus on just one model or provide overviews of the models per se. The Roles of Heredity and Environment In this class, we have explored the roles heredity, the environment, and epigenetics play in the development of personality. In this section, Synthesize your views on how heredity and the environment affect personality development. Assessment in Personality Theory In this section, reflect on the various methods for assessing personality that have been presented in this course, and select one that you feel is most useful. Describe briefly the assessment method that you believe is most useful in assessing personality. Justify your selection of this method. Personal Applications In this section of the paper, reflect on your personality and address the following items: Identify which of the seven models best explains your developmental journey. Provide at least one specific example of an element or elements of your personality that are explained by your selected model. Career Applications In this section, consider how you can use the knowledge from this course as a professional, addressing the following item: Explain how you can use the knowledge you have gained about personality development to help achieve your career goals. Conclusion Provide a brief conclusion, addressing the following: Summarize the ideas presented in your synthesis of, and reflection on, personality theory.

The post three models—behavioral, interpersonal, and self-psychology models. For each of appeared first on homework handlers.

Answer any two of the following questions for ten points each. The expectation i

Answer any two of the following questions for ten points each. The expectation is also that, being a take-home exam with a wide window of time to complete two questions, you will make direct and specific reference to, and citation from the readings. The style is that of an essay, and as such your answers should be structured after a miniature term paper. The quality of your writing is important here in communicating a clear answer. Question 1: There are a number of factors that affect the nature of representation by Canada’s individual Members of Parliament. It has been observed that the role and nature of the job has evolved throughout our history, and some factors have definitely changed over time. Authors such as Smith, Bakvis Malloy and Docherty have addressed the challenges to democratic representation in Canada. What are these limitations, and how do they affect the nature of genuine democratic representation at every level of Canadian government? Question 2: The Westminster style of Parliamentary democracy has a tendency to place a significant amount of power at the level of the offices of the Executive. This focusing the locus of power at the top has severe implications for representational democracy. Authors such as Bakvis, Docherty, Malloy, and Savoie illustrate both the implications that this phenomenon for democracy and suggest some solutions that might lessen the democratic deficit. What are the factors that focus power at the top of the political ladder, and what solutions have been suggested to lessen this tendency? Amongst the solutions proposed, which are more politically practical than others and why. Question 3: When Canada repatriated the Constitution and embedded the Charter of Rights and Freedoms therein in 1982, this placed significant limits upon the expression of parliamentary supremacy, or so it has been argued by many authors. But is this really so? How is parliamentary supremacy limited, and if it is limited, is that a positive or negative effect of the decision to integrate the Charter into the Constitution? Using authors such as Hiebert and Kelly, take up either side of this argument, or both, in answering this question. readings used these past few weeks: – Donald Savoie, Governing from the Centre: The Concentration of Power in Canadian Politics, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1999, pp. 71-109. – Janet L. Hiebert, “Notwithstanding the Charter: Does Section 33 Accommodate Federalism?”, in Goodyear-Grant, Elizabeth, and Hanniman, Kyle, eds., Canada at 150: Federalism and Democratic Renewal, Kingston, Queen’s University Institute of Governmental Relations, 2019, pp. 59-84 – James B. Kelly, “The Supreme Court of Canada and the Complexity of Judicial Activism,” in Abelson, Donald E., James, Patrick, and Lusztig, Michael, eds., The Myth of the Sacred: the Charter, the courts, and the politics of the constitution in Canada, Montreal & Kingston, McGill-Queen’s UP, 2002, pp. 97-122. – David C. Docherty, Mr. Smith Goes to Ottawa: Life in the House of Commons, Vancouver, UBC Press, 1997, pp. 31-59. – Louis Massicotte, “Changing the Canadian Electoral System,” in Paul Howe, Richard Johnston and Andre Blasi, eds., Strengthening Canadian Democracy, Montreal, IRPP, 2005, pp. 65-98.

The post Answer any two of the following questions for ten points each. The expectation i appeared first on homework handlers.

Directions: This is a three-part assignment with the intent of having the studen

Directions: This is a three-part assignment with the intent of having the student review conflict, delegation and creating a healthy workplace. After completing the readings and other scholarly sources, create a presentation with at least ten PowerPoint slides to detail the items below. Part 1: Conflict Describe a conflict situation from your experience (real or imagined). In the presentation address all of the below items: Review the steps for conflict management in Chapter 21 of the textbook (table 21.2), describe each Compromising Competing Cooperating/Accommodating Smoothing Avoiding Collaborating Next, describe the conflict management strategy that was utilized, and whether this worked and resolved the conflict. Go to table 21.4 in the readings and tell what you should do before, during, and after the negotiation (define each with a reference from the readings). From the same chapter, list the three destructive techniques for resolving conflicts. Make sure you define each with a reference. Did you use any of these? Part 2: Delegation Describe an experience with delegating tasks to others (either licensed or non-licensed personnel- real or imagined). Go to table 20.1 and discuss the five rights of delegation. List and define each with a reference. Describe how you would or how you used each right to ensure the delegation was appropriate. Go to table 20.2 and list the strategies for successful delegation. Ensure you provide a reference. Did any of these apply to your scenario? If not, how could you have a better outcome using these strategies? See page 530-531 in the text and describe each of the three delegation errors. Did any of these apply to your scenario? List these with a reference. Have you experienced these errors and the past? What typically causes each? Part 3: Creating a Healthy Work Environment Complete the readings listed in the module and define: A healthy work environment- provide a definition and reference The components of a healthy work environment-define with a reference Define your present work environment, is it a healthy work environment? If not, what steps would you take according to the research to make it a healthy work environment? What must an effective leader do to create a healthy work environment? First, create the Powerpoint presentation with references on slides where appropriate. Remember all slides should have key-words that you expand upon during your presentation. Suggested readings: 1. Chapter 18- Creating a Motivating Culture. Marquis. B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2017). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing. (9th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 2. Chapter 21 – Effective Conflict Resolution and Negotiation. Marquis. B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2017). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing. (9th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 3. Chapter 20 – Delegation. Marquis. B.L. & Huston, C.J. (2017). Leadership roles and management functions in nursing. (9th ed). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer. 4. Huddleston, P., Mancini, M.E., & Gray, J. (2017). Measuring Nurse Leaders’ and Direct Care Nurses’ Perceptions of a Healthy Work Environment in Acute Care Settings, Part 3. Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(3), 140-146. doi:10.1097/NNA.0000000000000456 5. Freed, J. E. (2014). Effective leaders create healthy work environments. Public Manager, 43(2), 21-25. 6. American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2016). AACN standards for establishing and sustaining healthy work environments. https://www.aacn.org/~/media/aacn-website/nursing-excellence/healthy-work-environment/execsum.pdf?la=en 7. American Association of Critical Care Nurses. (2018). AACN healthy work environment assessment. https://www.aacn.org/~/media/aacn-website/nursing-excellence/healthy-work-environment/hwesampleassessment.pdf?la=en (Links to an external site.)

The post Directions: This is a three-part assignment with the intent of having the studen appeared first on homework handlers.

The Purpose of Project This is a topical research project in philosophy of law;

The Purpose of Project This is a topical research project in philosophy of law; which means it is essentially a term paper on the subject of jurisprudence and philosophy; which means in choosing your project you are looking at the law on a particular topic and by what means it has been adjudicated; which means you must talk about how and on what grounds judges have settled on the answers to a particular legal problem. I left the topic open for you to follow your curiosity, in order to explore whatever topics interest you, and for you to see how the law has developed in that area. You might find that the law hasn’t actually been settled when it comes to your interests, making it a difficult to write about. Even if you have to switch topics, you will learn something along the way. The best topic will be one that has at least one Supreme Court case to look at or, if not that, perhaps a State Supreme Court case, or at least one or more Federal Circuit cases to examine. This will help you to narrow your topic down and stay focused on explicating the relevant matters of legal interpretation. The ultimate aim here, as described in the syllabus, is to utilize the concepts from philosophy of law to address a particular legal constitutional issue, by providing the following: the background of that issue, a clear statement of the state of the law today, a description (essentially a brief) of the key case(s), the level of scrutiny or other measure of analysis utilized by the Court, a discussion of the ethical and jurisprudential considerations (is it utilitarian or deontological in nature, does it lean natural law or legal positivist?), and some measure of critical analysis of the final position. Outline Content: Your outline should provide a description of the legal issue you intend to research and the issue and holding of the case(s) you intend to use. Due April 5th. Presentation Content: You will need to sign up for a presentation between April 19 and May 10th detailing your research findings which should include the elements described above: (1) some background on the issue (2) a clear statement of the state of the law today (3) a description of the key case(s) (4) a discussion of the level of scrutiny or other measure of analysis utilized by the Court (5) a discussion of the ethical & jurisprudential considerations (6) some critical analysis of the state of the law. Format: You should create and share some sort of visual aid (a power point or a handout sheet) during your presentation. Your presentation should not be longer than ten minutes. You have the option of presenting live during our Zoom class or creating a video and sharing it on the Discussion Board. Final Papers Content: Your paper should include: (1) the background of that issue (2) a clear statement of the state of the law today (3) a description of the key cases (4) a description of the level of scrutiny or other measure of analysis utilized by the Court (5) a discussion of the ethical & jurisprudential considerations (6) some critical analysis of the state of the law. Format: · Papers should be roughly four (4) pages, single spaced, 1” margins, and 12 point Times New Roman. (maximum of 5 pages). · Citations are required. You will need to provide citations for every reference to the thoughts, statement, positions, etc. of any author or court case that you rely on. o Footnote citations at the bottom of the page are best. Endnotes are fine as well. You do not need to provide a Bibliography/Work Cited page. o For articles, you can use MLA style (or any other style, so long as the citations are consistent and the source can be easily ascertained). i.e., Poniewozik, James. “TV Makes a Too-Close Call.” Time, 20 Nov. 2000, pp. 70-71. With the subsequent citation merely stating, James, p.31. Here is a source that can help: https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/mla_style/mla_formatting_and_style_guide/mla_works_cited_periodicals.html o For legal cases, you will find embedded page numbers in the text of the case. A proper case cite will include the case name, the citation, and the relevant page number, i.e., Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 115 (1973). With subsequent citations merely stating, Roe v. Wade, 116. Here is a source that can help: https://lib.guides.umd.edu/c.php?g=326428&p=2192780 The best place to do legal research is on the Lexis/Nexis, a database will find on the CSU library website. · Writing style. The number one goal in writing this paper is CLARITY. o Ideally, you will simply write like a robot. That means you will write your paper with as little nuance and flowery language and egregious embellishment as possible. There should be no cause for confusion. Every sentence must be easily understood and needs to serve some purpose within your paper. In other words, do not write some beautiful mess of words or that could mean many different things to many different people and expect to do well. o You will be graded on the demonstration of your research efforts, the clarity of your statements, and your ability to follow the guidelines of this prompt. o While the paper calls for critical analysis, this is not a position or rhetorical paper. It does not ask you to advocate for a particular view, it requires you to analyze the legal issues in a balanced and critical manner.

The post The Purpose of Project This is a topical research project in philosophy of law; appeared first on homework handlers.