Review the vignette on Juan in the attached document, “Juan Case Study.” Write a

Review the vignette on Juan in the attached document, “Juan Case Study.” Write a paper in 1,200-1,500 words addressing the following: Based on this vignette and in alignment with the current DSM diagnostic codes, what is the best diagnosis for Juan? Share specific elements of the case study that helped you form this diagnosis. Based on Juan’s case history and presentation, what symptoms is he experiencing, and why are these symptoms considered dysfunctional (pathological)? Consider cultural factors using the sociocultural psychological model (school of thought) and explain how factors within this model play a role in the development of the symptoms. Identify the causes of and treatment options for substance related disorders. Develop a treatment plan for Juan. Include two to three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources to support your claims. In addition to the scholarly resources from the library, you can include past classroom materials, your textbook, and credible internet-based sources (.org, .edu, .mil, .gov).

The post Review the vignette on Juan in the attached document, “Juan Case Study.” Write a appeared first on homework handlers.

Instructions Care facility design: Choose a stage of life (newborn, early childh

Instructions Care facility design: Choose a stage of life (newborn, early childhood, middle childhood, adolescence, elder, hospice). Imagine a care facility for that age group. In pictures, paragraphs and tables, with a mission in mind, design your operation. Consider each of the following questions. What is the purpose of your operation—mission, vision and values? What are the physical requirements of your operation—buildings, vehicles and so on? What are your staffing requirements at every phase? Hiring Retention Training Discipline Termination Daily operations: What programming will take place at your facility? Budget: Balance income and expenses. How much will you have to charge each person to break even or make a profit? Note how this impacts your personnel priorities.

The post Instructions Care facility design: Choose a stage of life (newborn, early childh appeared first on homework handlers.

Term Paper Assignment : International Organizations In a paper of 7-10 typed, do

Term Paper Assignment : International Organizations In a paper of 7-10 typed, double-spaced pages (12-point Times or Times New Roman font, minimum oneinch/2.54 cm margins) Analyze an international organization of your choice in terms of two theories of international relations covered in class, as follows: 1. Choose an international organization. (Global and regional IGOs, and NGOs, are acceptable choices. If you are unsure whether an organization qualifies, ask.) Determine whether sufficient research material is available to write a paper on the organization. If not, choose another organization. Also, if you choose a large and complicated organization such as the UN or EU, you should narrow your topic to a component or activity of the larger organization—such as the European Court of Justice or UN peacekeeping—or to a more specific topic in relation to the organization. 2. Choose some specific activity, decision, or aspect (your topic) of the international organization to analyze. For example, if you write about the United Nations, you could choose a specific peacekeeping mission, or a Security Council Resolution, or the selection of a Secretary-General, or voting patterns in the General Assembly. 3. Choose two theories of international relations covered in class (ie, realism, liberalism, neoliberal institutionalism, constructivism, critical theory—or versions of these). The theories should be relevant to the organization you choose, and should have contrasting implications regarding the organization. Also, do not choose ‘straw person’ theories; that is, theories that are weak on their face in relation to the topic. (The term comes from straw figures used as targets for soldiers learning to use a bayonet. The idea is that defeating a straw person is a meaningless accomplishment. You should choose theories that are viable explanations of the organization you write about.) 4. Analyze the topic (from point 2) from the perspective of the two theories (from point 3). To do this, you must: a. Briefly describe the organization and the topic (specific activity, decision, or aspect). This description may include the organization’s purpose(s), founding and major historical developments, membership, structure, activities, and basic decision-making procedures. However, this section should not be more than 2-3 pages, so be selective. In this section, you must discuss in what ways the organization corresponds to the actor, forum, and resource views of IOs as described in chapter 2 of the Hurd textbook. The description must be written entirely in your own words, except for properly acknowledged quotes. Do not copy sentences, even with minor word changes, from IO web sites or others’ descriptions of the IO.2 b. Explain the theories. Explain the basic theoretical logic and perspective on international organizations of each theory. c. Use the theories to analyze the organization. Discuss the extent to which the organization’s activities, structure, membership, or historical development (whatever about the organization you choose to focus on) are consistent with each theory’s expectations. Explain those expectations, and evaluate their consistency with evidence from the organization’s history and/or activities. (You may wish to separate this into two sections: one describing the organization’s actions or behavior, followed by another section discussing the extent to which the behavior fits the expectations of each theory.) Your analysis should relate to specific concepts or claims from each theory about how international organizations matter according to that theory. (For example, depending on the theory: Did the organization facilitate external balancing, reduce transaction costs, socialize members, or legitimize global capitalism?) To identify the relevant predictions or claims of each theory, review your lecture and reading notes on the theories. Do not argue that any self-interested behavior or conflict is automatically evidence for realism, or that cooperation proves liberalism correct. Such arguments display fundamental ignorance of the theories, and risk a failing grade on the paper. (See Hurd chapter 2 on why such claims are wrong.) d. Draw conclusions. What implications follow from your analysis, either for the functioning of the organization, or international organizations in general, or for using the theories you chose to analyze international organizations? What does your analysis tell us about the future of the international organization you studied (or, if you chose a defunct organization such as the League of Nations, for existing international organizations), member state policies, or the issue-area addressed by the organization? Organizational Elements Your paper should have the following elements: • An introduction and thesis: The introduction must say what your topic (the aspect of your international organization that you focus on) is, which two theories you will discuss, and what your thesis is. Your thesis (in the introduction) should be a claim about what the theories would say about your topic, and your evaluation of those explanations. (Example: “While theory X predicts that UN Security Council expansion will occur in the next decade, I argue that theory Y’s prediction that it will not is more convincing.”) • Explanations of the theories: You must explain the overall logic and key concepts of each theory. • Application of theories to the scenario: Explain how each theory would analyze and explain the activity or feature of your chosen international organization that you focus on. • Your evaluation: What is your assessment of the theoretical perspectives on your chosen scenario that you have just presented? Do they complement or contradict each other? Which is more convincing, and why? (This can go in your conclusion, or be a separate section.) General Requirements • To receive credit for the paper, you must submit a signed (by hand, not typed) copy of the “plagiarism form” available on the Moodle course web page. Scans, or photos are acceptable. If you do not have access to a device capable of scanning or taking and transferring a digital photo, you may type the text of the plagiarism form into an email, say that you agree to it, type your name as signature, and send the email to Professor Lipson; • The paper must be organized into sections, identified by headings and subheadings. Write an outline before you begin the paper; • Write in paragraphs. Section headings do not replace paragraph structure. Each section must contain at least two paragraphs. Every page must contain at least one paragraph break (that is, you should never have a single paragraph taking up a full page). • State your thesis or main point early in the paper;3 • Do not write titles of articles or books that you are referencing in the text. (For example, don’t write: “In the article, ‘The False Promise of International Institutions,’ by John Mearsheimer, he argues that realism says…” Instead, write: “Realism claims that…(Mearsheimer 1994/95, 7).” • Spelling and grammar matter, as does the clarity and organization of your writing. Proofread and revise; • Include a title page and bibliography (which do not count toward the page length guideline). Do not number the title page; • Number all pages except the title page. The first page of text should be numbered “1.” Sources and citations 1. Use Chicago author-date style for reference formatting. Follow the formatting guidelines carefully. Note that the listings of readings on the course outline are formatted according to the notes format in Chicago Notes-Bibliography style, not Author-Date style. You will have to reformat for Chicago author-date. 2. You must include in-text citations and a bibliography. Papers lacking these will not be graded and will receive no credit. The bibliography does not count toward the page count. (Note that a bibliography is not the same as a works cited list. A bibliography includes all works cited and background sources that you consulted and drew upon but did not cite. Include a bibliography, not a works cited list.) 3. Include at least (3) references to peer-reviewed academic journal articles (not newspapers or magazines) to support your analysis. This means you must include in-text citations to three articles, not just list them in your bibliography. A selected list of relevant peer-reviewed academic journals available in the library, and guidelines for finding peer reviewed journals. 4. Cite relevant readings assigned in the course. (These do not count towards requirement number 3 above, regarding the minimum number of articles.) You must cite at least three (3) readings assigned in the class, either from online course reserves or the Hurd or MacKenzie textbooks. This means you must include in-text citations to three readings, not just list them in your bibliography. 5. In-text citations must include the specific page numbers on which you found the specific fact or idea that you are citing (unless the source is an unpaginated web page or an unpaginated kindle book). If citing an amazon kindle or other e-reader book without page numbers corresponding to the print edition, provide the chapter and section title in place of a page number. For example, if using the ePub version of the 2nd edition of the Hurd textbook, to cite the explanation of ontologies (actor, forum, resource) in Chapter 2, instead of writing (Hurd 2014, 28-36), you would write (Hurd 2014, Ch. 2, “Three views on ontology: actor, forum, resource”). 6. Your bibliography must be organized alphabetically by author’s last name.

The post Term Paper Assignment : International Organizations In a paper of 7-10 typed, do appeared first on homework handlers.

It’s a 1,500 Word Essay- Are the United States and China heading toward the ‘Thu

It’s a 1,500 Word Essay- Are the United States and China heading toward the ‘Thucydides Trap’? (I wrote sources: 20, Pages: 7, but that’s not what is needed- I just assumed that 1,500 Words take at least 20 references & around 6-7 pages) An essay is a piece of formal writing about a particular topic, usually responding to a question or a problem. The main task is to answer this puzzle by persuading the reader of your argument using evidence and research. Your writing should demonstrate that you have understood the question and should indicate knowledge of at least of one theory (but not more than 3) studied in this module, as well as a grasp of the purpose of theory. Select this topic: Are the United States and China heading toward the ‘Thucydides Trap’? Structure of the essay: 1. An introduction (250 words), which must include: a. Explain the question, introduce why this question is important, and give some context to the question b. Your argument (this can be the answer to the question), clearly and explicitly stated. c. An outline of the different sections of your essay, clearly ‘signposting’ the rest of your essay. 2. Main body of text (1,000 words): this part should be organised coherently with clearly separated paragraphs (each paragraphs should be no longer than 200 words). You can organise your main body with 2-3 sections and subheadings. Each section should address the question and should demonstrate the validity of your argument. This should demonstrate research and bring evidence to your argument. 3. Conclusion (250 words): the conclusion should summarise the argument and the different sections of your main body of text. It should also draw on the implications of your argument. In other words, you should ask yourself: ‘and so what’? , ‘what does this argument mean for International Relations’? You should avoid adding new information or a new argument in your conclusion. Assessment Details: Type: Essay Resources: The essay should use at least the core reading(s) on the theoretical approach selected, the core reading of Week 1 (on the purpose of theory) and at least an additional 3-4 (supplementary) readings on the topic selected, to pass. The literature is available on the Reading List Online (access through Moodle on the right hand-side). Word Count: 1,500 words Please note that all coursework must have a word count clearly presented at the end of the essay. Penalties for essays going over the allocated word count are as follows: • Over 10% over word length – deduct 5 marks. • Over 20% over word length – deduct 8 marks. • Over 25% over word length – deduct 10 marks. • Over 50% over word length – deduct 20 marks Presentation: ? Work must be referenced, and a bibliography provided ? Work must be submitted as a Word document (.doc/docx) ? Course work must be submitted using Arial font size 11 (or larger if you need to), with a minimum of 1.5 line spacing ? Your student number must appear at the front of the coursework. Your name must not be on your coursework. Referencing: Harvard (in-text) referencing should be used accurately and carefully. A full Harvard guideline is on the Moodle (assessment folder). Regulations: Make sure you understand the University Regulations on expected academic practice and academic misconduct. Note in particular: ? Your work must be your own. Markers will be attentive to both the plausibility of the sources provided as well as the consistency and approach to writing of the work. Simply, if you do the research and reading, and then write it up on your own, giving the reference to sources, you will approach the work in the appropriate way and will cause not give markers reason to question the authenticity of the work. ? All quotations must be credited and properly referenced. Paraphrasing is still regarded as plagiarism if you fail to acknowledge the source for the ideas being expressed. TURNITIN: When you upload your work to the Moodle site it will be checked by anti-plagiarism software.

The post It’s a 1,500 Word Essay- Are the United States and China heading toward the ‘Thu appeared first on homework handlers.