•  From the scenario, analyze the general points between initiating civil procedures, the prevalent practices of these procedures within health care litigation solutions, and the influence of corporate structure on resolutions and subsequent legal precedents. Defend or critique the use of the aforementioned prevalent practices in the multidisciplined interaction required of 21st Century health care administrators.
• Summarize the crucial steps involved in conducting a trial based on the pleadings of the defendants, leading up to the execution of judgments and including the awarding of damages. Analyze the concept of respondeat superior and concept of corporate negligence as they apply to responsibilities of the hospital’s governing body and corporate structure. Provide examples of the application of such concepts to support your response.

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post analyze the general points between initiating civil procedures, the prevalent practices of these procedures within health care litigation solutions€¦€¦. appeared first on Psychology Homework.

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Ethics of Sham Surgery in Parkinson’s’ Disease Patients. I. Introduction a. The controversy (or ethics) of using ˜sham surgery’ in Parkinson’s disease patients. i. Define sham surgery, Parkinson’s disease (PD), placebo, neurosurgery, fetal cell transplantation, burr holes¦ b. Is it ethical or unethical to use ˜sham surgery’ in Parkinson’s disease patients? c. Thesis II. Explanation of Position One (The first philosopher/opinion) a. For Sham Surgery in PD patients III. Explanation of Position Two (The second philosopher/opinion) a. Against Sham Surgery in PD patients IV. Compare & Contrast the two positions a. Difference between philosopher 1 & 2 b. Similarities between philosopher 1& 2 V. My position a. Defend position for sham surgery in PD patients VI. Criticize the position I chose (from the perspective of other position) a. No sham surgery in PD patients VII. Re-defend original position a. Defend position for sham surgery in PDpatients VIII. Conclusion References Albin, R. L. (2002). Sham surgery controls: intracerebral grafting of fetal tissue for Parkinson’s disease and proposed criteria for use of sham surgery controls. Journal of Medical Ethics, 28(5), 322- 325. Clark, P. (2002). Placebo surgery for Parkinson’s disease: Do the benefits outweigh the risks. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 30(1), 58-68. Dekkers, W., & Boer, G. (2001). Sham neurosurgery in patients with Parkinson’s disease: is it morally acceptable?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(3), 151-156. Fletcher, J. (2003). Sham neurosurgery in Parkinson’s disease: Ethical at the time. The American Journal of Bioethics, 3(4), 54-56. Hildt, E. (2009). Ethical challenges in cell-based interventions for neurological conditions: Some lessons to be learnt from clinical transplantation trials in patients with Parkinson’s disease. The American Journal of Bioethics, 9(5), 37-38. Lewis, S., Caldwell, M., & Barker, R. (2003). Modern therapeutic approaches in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Reviews in Molecular Medicine, 5(10), 1-20. Swift, T., & Huxtable, R. (2011). The ethics of sham surgery in Parkinson’s disease: Back to the future?. Bioethics, doi:
 
“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Ethics of Sham Surgery in Parkinson’s’ Disease Patients. appeared first on Psychology Homework.

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”