When thinking about the outcomes in the U. S. to date with COVID-19 how would you propose policymakers consider slicing the chocolate cake (Stone, 2012) differently in the future to better achieve a state of health and racial equity?

When thinking about the outcomes in the U. S. to date with COVID-19 how would you propose policymakers consider slicing the chocolate cake (Stone, 2012) differently in the future to better achieve a state of health and racial equity? Try to be specific and provide a rationale. Explain why you deem your proposal as “fair.” Minimally refer and reference the readings this week of Stone and Wen & Sadeghi. Share an example of an upstream policy, explain, and reference. Briefly remind the group what problem you are considering for your policy analysis. Identify and define a minimum of 3 evaluation criteria you will use to assess policy alternatives under consideration for the problem identified in week 2. Very important: you are defining criteria you will use to assess which policy solution (alternative) you will recommend to decision makers. You are NOT defining criteria to evaluate if the policy is effective (the outcomes). Share 2 of your top 5 “strengths” that you believe will be most useful to you in working in the policy arena, on your problem of interest, as a nurse leader. Explain your rationale.

---

 

---

The post When thinking about the outcomes in the U. S. to date with COVID-19 how would you propose policymakers consider slicing the chocolate cake (Stone, 2012) differently in the future to better achieve a state of health and racial equity? appeared first on nursing assignment tutor.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

---

Interview a person in a formal position of leadership within your organization (e.g., a supervisor, a manager, a director). Begin your interview with the following questions:

1. What is your role as a health care team member?
2. How do you define professionalism and how does professional responsibility influence your work?
3. Do you consider yourself a steward of health care? Why or Why not?
4. Is it important to you that leaders exercise professional advocacy and authenticity as well as power and influence when working with colleagues? Why or why not?

In 500-750 words, summarize your interview and share your impressions of the leader’s responses.

Compare and contrast responses provided by your peer (in Professional Identity and Stewardship – Part I: Peer Interview assignment) with those provided by the leader. Share your impressions of their differences and similarities.

Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post professional identity and stewardship part ii leadership interview 2 appeared first on The Nursing TermPaper.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

---