write a review about a anatomy physiology journal article of your choosing

/in /by

The Anatomy of a Peer-Reviewed, Scientific Journal Article

Objectives – by the end of this assignment, you should be able to:

  • Use library resources to search databases for peer-reviewed, scientific journal articles
  • Identify the main parts of a scientific journal article
  • Describe what kind of information is presented in each section of the journal article
  • Describe the format of the information presented in each section of the journal article

Part 1: Find a journal article

  • Use library resources (databases) to locate a peer-reviewed, scientific journal article.
    • When searching for articles, make sure you select “Full Text” as an option in the database, because you will need the full copy of the article for this assignment.
    • Use the library databases to find the article! Do NOT just search Google for an article. You will most likely find a source that is not appropriate for this assignment, or you will find online databases that will make you pay to access the article. By searching the library’s databases, you will be able to find articles that are appropriate for this assignment AND free of charge to you. Do NOT pay for a journal article.
  • The article needs to be related specifically to anatomy and physiology, but you can choose any topic that interests you.
  • The following journal article types are NOT appropriate for this particular assignment:
    • Case studies
    • Review papers
  • The journal article has to include the following sections:
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and methods (may be together or may be two different sections)
    • Results
    • Conclusion
    • Citations
  • Scientific journal articles can be hard to understand for a beginning science student, so find an article that is at your level that you can understand. It is okay if you do not understand all of the specific terminology, but you should be able to understand what the researchers did at a superficial level.
  • If you are unsure if your journal article is appropriate, please send me a link to the abstract or a copy of the pdf and I will confirm your choice.
  • Download and save a digital copy (pdf) of your journal article. You will need to either upload the digital copy to D2L or provide a paper copy when you turn in the assignment.
  • The citations must use endnotes, which are typically indicated by the author’s name and the date in parenthesis at the end of the sentence. For this assignment, footnotes are not appropriate.

Part 2: Review the article

  • Answer the questions as you review your journal article.
  • Type up your answers using a word processing program with the following format:
    • 12 point, standard font (Calibri or Arial are both good)
    • Double spaced
    • 1-inch margins
  • In which database did you find your article?
  • What is the name of the journal in which your article was published?
  • There is other information provided along with the name of the journal. What does this information mean?
  • What are the authors’ names and affiliations?
  • Provide a citation for the journal article you used. Use either MLA or APA format.
  • Read the introduction.
    • Does the author start talking about the subject broadly and more specific towards the end? Or does the author start talking about a specific topic and then broaden the scope of the information?
    • Based on the introduction, write a short summary of what specific research was conducted and reported in this paper and how it is related to a broader topic.
    • What is the researchers’ hypothesis/prediction?
  • Read the Materials and Methods section(s).
    • List 3 materials that the authors used in their experiments. Be sure to include any specifics the authors mentioned (amount, brand, etc.) Materials may include technology, software used to do modeling or analyze data, reagents, etc.
    • Identify 3 specifics the authors mentioned with regards to their methods (how they conducted the experiment). This may include how samples were collected and/or tested, how analysis was conducted, time data was collected, etc.
  • Read the results section:
    • Write down 3 results that the researchers mentioned in the results section. Be sure to include all the information associated with the result (“P” value, statistical tests used, range, average, etc.)
    • Explain how the researchers presented their data to the reader. Did they write out long lists of raw (un-analyzed) data? Or did they provide tables, graphs, or other images to illustrate the analyzed data?
  • Read the conclusion:
    • Write a short explanation as to how the conclusion discussed how the results supported or did not support the hypothesis/prediction.
    • Does the author start talking about the subject broadly and more specific towards the end? Or does the author start talking about a specific topic and then broaden the scope of the information?
  • Read the abstract:
    • Did the abstract adequately summarize what was covered in the article? Explain why or why not.
  • Citations
    • Copy down three sentences from the journal article that have citations. Include the specific format of the citation (note parentheses, where commas and/or periods are located, which letters are italicized, what information is provided, etc.)
    • Look at the Works Cited or References Page.
  • If sections other than the ones covered above are included in your journal, list them below.

i.What do you notice about the order of the citations?

ii.Describe 4 pieces of information that is provided in most, if not all, of the citations.

iii.Pick a citation, find it in the library database, and copy and paste a screenshot of the title and abstract.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post write a review about a anatomy physiology journal article of your choosing appeared first on The Nursing Hub.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Advanced Psycholopathology Final Exam – Nursing Writers Hub

/in /by

Begin Final ExamThe Final Exam consists of eight (8) Essay questions. Use the reading   assignments thoroughly in an integrative discussion of your own understanding   of the questions posed. Remember to reference all work cited or quoted   by the text author. You should be doing this often in your responses. If you use outside resources, they should support the text information, but not replace the text.All discussions must take into account the legal and ethical   considerations, as well as issues of culture and human diversity that   may pertain to the questions below.  Legal and Ethical information   is in Chapter 16 of the course text. Cultural information is covered   throughout the course text and DSM 5. You may use alternative cultural   resources to enhance your work.Your response to each question should be approx. 1 page per question.Your total assignment should be 8-9 pages plus a title and reference page.Due Week 81.  What is meant by the notion that mental illness is a social   construction? How does cross-cultural research suggest that   psychopathology is universal rather than a social construction?2.  It is widely recognized that people with autism spectrum disorder   display deficits in communication and social behavior. It is perhaps   less often noted that in some areas, their abilities may surpass those   of people without autism spectrum disorder.  What is your understanding   if this theory? How do the enhanced abilities of those with autism   spectrum disorder lend credence to an evolutionary approach to   psychopathology?3.  Phrases such as “broken hearts” and “hurt feelings” liken  emotional  pain to physical pain. To what extent is the metaphor implied  in these  phrases supported neuroscientifically?4.  The role of trauma and the experience of unusual states of  awareness  or identity in the dissociative disorders have led  psychologists to  explore the relationship between dissociation and  post-traumatic stress,  on the one hand, and hypnosis, on the other.  Briefly summarize the  results of this research.5.  Discuss some of the reasons why the treatment of  substance-related  and addictive disorders is especially challenging.  Addiction to  methamphetamine is particularly difficult to treat. Review  some of the  cognitive deficits seen in methamphetamine addiction and  explain how  these deficits complicate efforts to treat the addiction.6.  Outline the neurodevelopmental hypothesis of the etiology of   schizophrenia. In what way does schizophrenia represent a paradox from   an evolutionary standpoint?7.  Discuss the evidence for genetic and environmental contributions  to  personality disorders. Identify the specific experiences that seem  to  underlie personality disorders. Which personality disorder seems the  most genetic?8. Highlight the beneficial effects of physical exercise not only on   preventing cognitive impairment among older adults without   neurocognitive disorders but also on reversing decline among those with   mild neurocognitive impairment.Assignment Outcomes
Analyze the physical, cognitive, social and personality aspects of abnormal psychology and implications across the life span
Examine the major diagnostic domains and specific criteria associated with DSM-5 disorders.
Evaluate legal and ethical issues in mental health treatment
Develop an awareness of diversity and cross-cultural perspectives in abnormal psychology.
Explore available treatment and interdisciplinary services for community members experiencing mental health disorders.
Identify the barriers associated with seeking and receiving therapeutic services.

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

develop a 10 15 slide presentation with comprehensive speaker s notes that covers all of the major areas of your evidence based practice proposal

/in /by

Develop a 10-15-slide presentation with comprehensive speaker’s notes that covers all of the major areas of your evidence-based practice proposal.

You will need to post a rough draft of your evidence-based practice presentation to the Main Forum in Topic 8 DQ 1 for peer feedback.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references compiled from the final project should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post develop a 10 15 slide presentation with comprehensive speaker s notes that covers all of the major areas of your evidence based practice proposal appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

read article and answer questions 15

/in /by

What was the major finding discovered by Project Aristotle regarding data patterns? [up to 10 points]

In trying to discover what made a team successful, what was the one thing Project Aristotle consistently found identified in their research as important (hint: the answer is not psychological safety)? [up to 10 points]

The article described two very different sample teams (Team A and Team B) and asks which team you would rather join. Which team would you rather join? Why? [up to 10 points]

Did it surprise you which team the article suggested you should join if given the choice? [up to 5 points] Why/Why not? [up to 5 points]

In studying groups, what two specific behaviors were generally shared among the teams considered “good”? [up to 20 points (10 points per behavior)]

Reflect on/discuss the concept of psychological safety that is identified and discussed toward the end of the article (e.g., What does it mean?). [up to 10 points]

How important do you think psychological safety is in team interactions? [up to 3 points] Why? [up to 7 points]

Discuss at least two concluding thoughts, take-aways, and/or new ways of thinking about team interactions resulting from this article. For example, were there points with which you particularly agreed or disagreed? [up to 20 points (10 points per take-away)]

 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”