week 5 bu 329 assignment 2
Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Software
Submit Assignment
Due Sunday by 11:59pm
Points 25
Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload
Instructions
Interacting Using the Project Team Management Software
Over the next several weeks we will be using Freedcamp to simulate team communication and project management. Your instructor will assign you to teams of approximately 3-5 individuals. You will be setting up the software, creating a project, interacting using the software, and reporting on its use.
Freedcamp – https://freedcamp.com
Tour – https://freedcamp.com/tour
Tutorials – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCntHp8am8zrxXEb_9…
Demonstrate the use of the software tool by interacting with it.
Post messages to teammates, upload files to the system, make notes on tasks, mark some tasks as complete.
Write a short (250 word) explanation of what you did, and include a variety of screenshots from multiple students demonstrating the interactions that you have had.
Estimated time to complete: 4 hours
Rubric
BU329 Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Software
BU329 Unit 5 Assignment 2 – Software
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
5.0 pts
Level 5
Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
4.5 pts
Level 4
Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
4.0 pts
Level 3
Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
3.5 pts
Level 2
Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
3.0 pts
Level 1
Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual facts but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 pts
Level 0
There is no evidence of a defined statement.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-I
10.0 pts
Level 5
Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
9.0 pts
Level 4
Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
8.0 pts
Level 3
Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
7.0 pts
Level 2
Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
6.0 pts
Level 1
Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 pts
Level 0
Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
5.0 pts
Level 5
The paper exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
4.5 pts
Level 4
The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
3.5 pts
Level 2
The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
3.0 pts
Level 1
The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 pts
Level 0
The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
5.0 pts
Level 5
The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
4.5 pts
Level 4
The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
4.0 pts
Level 3
The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.5 pts
Level 2
The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
3.0 pts
Level 1
Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 pts
Level 0
There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.
5.0 pts
Total Points: 25.0
<a href="https://herzing.instructure.com/courses/7871/modules/items/452236" role="button" class="Button module-sequence-footer-button–previous" data-tooltip="right" data-html-tooltip-title=" Unit 5 Assignment 1″ aria-describedby=”msf0-previous-desc”>PreviousNext
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount! Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post week 5 bu 329 assignment 2 appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.
“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”
s Discussion focuses on developmental models because they are perhaps the most widely used supervisory models. Developmental models are uniquely created for supervision and training. Stoltenberg (2008) suggests that a number of domains should be evaluated for supervision, including intervention skills competence, assessment techniques, interpersonal assessment, client conceptualization, theoretical orientation, professional ethics, individual differences, and treatment goals and plans. Each of these domains provides a wealth of important information for a supervisor to assess in his or her supervisee.
