assault battery and crimes against persons paper

1. Compare and contrast the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Provide one (1) example of each crime to support your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Did not submit or incompletely provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Insufficiently provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Partially provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Satisfactorily provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly compared and contrasted the key similarities and differences between the crime of assault with a deadly weapon and the crime of felonious and aggravated battery. Thoroughly provided one (1) example of each crime to support your response.

LEG320-A3-22. Determine whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Next, determine whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Justify your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Did not submit or incompletely determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Insufficiently determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Insufficiently justified your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Partially determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Partially justified your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Satisfactorily determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly determined whether or not the jurisdiction in which the crime has occurred should consider the man’s actions as assault. Thoroughly determined whether or not the jurisdiction should punish the man’s actions as battery. Thoroughly justified your response.

3. Suggest one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Support the validity of your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Did not submit or incompletely supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Insufficiently supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Partially supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Satisfactorily supported the validity of your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly suggested one (1) different fact pattern that would change the scenario from felonious and aggravated assault and / or battery to simple assault. Thoroughly supported the validity of your response.

4. Discuss the crime of kidnapping. Next, debate whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely discussed the crime of kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently discussed the crime of kidnapping. Insufficiently debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially discussed the crime of kidnapping. Partially debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily discussed the crime of kidnapping. Satisfactorily debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly discussed the crime of kidnapping. Thoroughly debated whether or not the suggested change in Question 3 would allow the court to convict the attacker for the crime of kidnapping. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

5. Differentiate between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Support or critique the notion that one of the two crimes is more serious than the other. Justify your response. Justify your response.
Weight: 15%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Did not submit or incompletely supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Did not submit or incompletely justified your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19.93 (10.49%)
Insufficiently differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Insufficiently supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Insufficiently justified your response.

Points Range:19.95 (10.5%) – 22.78 (11.99%)
Partially differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Partially supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Partially justified your response.

Points Range:22.8 (12%) – 25.63 (13.49%)
Satisfactorily differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Satisfactorily supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Satisfactorily justified your response.

Points Range:25.65 (13.5%) – 28.5 (15%)
Thoroughly differentiated between the crimes of hostage taking and kidnapping. Thoroughly supported or critiqued the notion that one of the two crimes is more heinous than the other. Thoroughly justified your response.

LEG320-A3-66. Debate whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Provide a rationale to support your response.
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 11.38 (5.99%)
Did not submit or incompletely debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Did not submit or incompletely provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:11.4 (6%) – 13.28 (6.99%)
Insufficiently debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Insufficiently provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:13.3 (7%) – 15.18 (7.99%)
Partially debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Partially provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:15.2 (8%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
Satisfactorily debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Satisfactorily provided a rationale to support your response.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19 (10%)
Thoroughly debated whether or not (A)’s action would require the attacker to defend himself. Thoroughly provided a rationale to support your response.

7. Cite 3 References.

Points Range:0 (0%) – 5.68 (2.99%)
No references provided.

Points Range:5.7 (3%) – 6.63 (3.49%)
Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices.

Points Range:6.65 (3.5%) – 7.58 (3.99%)
Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices.

Points Range:7.6 (4%) – 8.53 (4.49%)
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.

Points Range:8.55 (4.5%) – 9.5 (5%)
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.

LEG320-A3-88. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10%

Points Range:0 (0%) – 11.38 (5.99%)
More than 8 errors present.

Points Range:11.4 (6%) – 13.28 (6.99%)
7-8 errors present.

Points Range:13.3 (7%) – 15.18 (7.99%)
5-6 errors present.

Points Range:15.2 (8%) – 17.08 (8.99%)
3-4 errors present.

Points Range:17.1 (9%) – 19 (10%)
0-2 errors present.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Jazz 8 5 10 Sentences

“Jazz is experiencing a resurgence as of late. The BBC ran a report recently that adults in their early 30’s, in Britain, report their favorite genre of music to now include jazz. There are more music schools that offer jazz education than during jazz’s heyday. Why do you think jazz has become so relevant today, especially for young people? Keep in mind everything we have learned and think about the world today before you answer.”

The post Jazz 8 5 10 Sentences appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Week 4: Thinking, Memory, Problem Solving, And Creativity Questions

Thinking, Memory, Problem Solving, and Creativity Questions
Select any threeof the following items to write about.  Each response should be 1-2 pages long. You may combine all responses into one paper and provide headings for each item.
1. Distinguish between the human mind and computers as tools for thinking. What does the human mind do better and why? What does the computer dobetter and why? Weigh in on the debate over artificial intelligence and support your claims.
2.  Take this free creativity problem solving test or one of your choosing, and weigh in on the results.  Do you feel they were on target?  Do you think the survey questions accurately assess problem-solving creativity? Are there reliable ways to measure creativity? Why is creativity an imortant area of study for psychologists?
3. Describe and discuss the role of consolidation.  Identify how psychologists study this process and why. Provide examples from your life that demonstrate the process of consolidation in action.
4. Describe mental imagery (theories and processes) and explain why people might use it for different reasons. How is it different from hypnosis. Identify a scientific study related to this process and describe the results. Weigh in on the effectiveness of mental imagery.  What role does motivation play? Have you ever tried to incorporate it in to your life? Explain.
5. Select one memory disorder to research and detail its causes, symptoms, and treatments (traditional and emerging).  Explain how therapists and/or psychologists can help support patients experiencing memory loss.
6. Research ways that culture influences how we categorize the world. Present a scenario using at least two different cultures to demonstrate the idea. Compare and contrast attitudes and perceptions based on cultural categorizations.  Why is it important to recognize this distinction?
7. Read the following excerpt from Final Jeopardy: Man vs. Machine and the Quest to Know Everything as discussed by delancyplace.com.  Devise and conduct a unique experiment to mimic the findings of the Moses illusion.  Detail your hypothesis, the experiment, the findings, and your analysis of those findings.
Find at least one scholarly source for each item to support your ideas. A minimum total of three sources should be cited and listed on your reference page.)
Use APA format to style your paper and cite and reference your sources.
Each response should be a 1—2 pages long, in addition to a title page and a reference page.
Refer to the rubric for more information on how your assignment will be graded.
Due: Sunday, 11:59 p.m. (Pacific time)
Points: 100

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


comment on this

 

The functions of the mind are complex through the different states of mind functioning and malfunctioning. This brings us to this three terms, psychotherapy, psychopathology and Mind Body Problem. Insanity and sanity as well as the role played by the mind as viewed by psychology helps us define and ascertain such differences (Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi,2000). The behavioral view of mind functioning holds that all mental processes are correlated to physical phenomena meaning mental malfunctioning is due to physical disorder as per the medical model theory of psychology. Correction of such mental disorders is through correct diagnosis. Chemical abnormalities such as low serotonin in depression and mood disorders same to physical disorders such as vitamin deficiencies and organ problems are hard to correct. Patient tend to feel specific pain or disorder in certain somatic disorders with no related physical cause example anxiety disorders that come as a result of improper breathing techniques and imbalance in neurotransmitters. Side effects of medications and interaction with certain medications cause abnormal functioning and probable misdiagnosis or drug prescription. Somatic disorders for instance, patients tend to feel pain or discomfort yet there is no evidence of physical cause therefore hard to establish the cause.

Physicians call this a mental processes but not a problem with the patient’s body as many would think. It does not involve the brain in most cases. A psychologists is normally required at this point. Somatoform disorders are mostly caused by the problems in the mind or cases such as hypochondria, post dramatic stress disorder, where a person may just choose to be sick. Neurotic disorders arise from lesser stress disorders such as family, divorce and no physical reasons at all. Phobia and myosphobia are some of the conditions that make some people act disorderly.

References

Seligman, M. E., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive psychology: An introduction (Vol. 55, No. 1, p. 5). American Psychological Association.

ReplyReply to Comment COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSIONDarlene FosterDarlene Foster
FridayOct 19 at 6:42pmManage Discussion EntryHi Victor     
     Severe mental illness is a serious one since it shortens the victims’ lifespan. I second the fact that it is difficult to treat mental disorders that involves problems related to organs. As a result of this, physical illness leads to mortality. Evidences indicate that people with severe mental illness are less likely to receive care regarding these diseases at a standard level.

     Medications may also have side effects. There is need for improvement to aid people with mental disorders. Mental disorders also make a victim vulnerable to physical health problems. The mortality rate is alarming and this calls for an immediate action because the problem medical comorbidities are still on the rise at a constant rate. Kazdin and Blase confirmed that there is need for interventions (23).

Reference
Kazdin, Alan E., and Stacey L. Blase. “Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness.” Perspectives on psychological science 6.1 (2011): 21-37. Barton, Jo, and Jules Pretty. “What is the best dose of nature and green exercise for improving mental health? A multi-study analysis.” Environmental science & technology 44.10 (2010): 3947-3955.
Kazdin, Alan E., and Stacey L. Blase. “Rebooting psychotherapy research and practice to reduce the burden of mental illness.” Perspectives on psychological science 6.1 (2011): 21-37.
Verhaeghe, Mieke, Piet Bracke, and Kevin Bruynooghe. “Stigmatization and self-esteem of persons in recovery from mental illness: the role of peer support.” International Journal of Social Psychiatry 54.3 (2008): 206-218. ReplyReply to Comment COLLAPSE SUBDISCUSSIONDana SennDana Senn
YesterdayOct 20 at 9pmManage Discussion EntryVictor and Darlene,
     You both bring up great points into the mental illness causes and treatments.  Victor, you mentioned Chemical abnormalities such as low serotonin being the cause for depression.  There are some things a person can do besides medication to increase serotonin.  Exercise is known to increase serotonin. Eun-Sang et al., (2017) studied this in rats and found an increase in serotonin after exercise.  
Relaxation techniques and  music therapy, are other recommendations for treatment of certain mental illnesses. According to Clute, (2017).  Although these techniques are not evidence based some clinicians use them and have positive results.
The behavioral view of mind functioning holds that all mental processes are correlated to physical phenomena meaning mental malfunctioning is due to physical disorder 
I must disagree with the statement you listed (Victor ) as the behavioral view of mind.  I do not agree that all mental processes are correlated to physical phenomena.  I do believe that a physical disorder can contribute to some mental disorders but not all.  Example: if a person loses a limb such as an arm, this can cause the individual to experience depression and or anxiety. 
 

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post comment on this appeared first on Psychology Homework.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”