I’m working on a Writing exercise and need support.Total two entry (1 and 2) Each entry write at least 200 words. Total at least 400 words, put answers in attached file template. Please download and use Reading Response Template (See attached file) to format your responses.ENTRY 1: Note: this is a multi-part entry. Please read the interview between Lindsey Davis and artist Maya Lin, THEN spend time looking at the website for Lin’s project “What is Missing?”. Please make sure to clearly respond to both sources in your writing.Part 1:Title: “Dematerializing the Memorial” (Links to an external site.) interview with Maya LinAuthor: Lindsey DavisNote: be very careful to attribute the interviewer (Lindsey Davis) and the interviewee (artist May Lin) correctly in your responses. Do not get them mixed up.Part 2:Please spend time looking around the What is Missing (Links to an external site.) project website (this is what the interview above is about)ENTRY 2: Title: Doris Salcedo: The Materiality of Mourning (see attached file)“From the Artist” (pp. xvii-xix) Note: this essay is authored by Doris Salcedo herself“Introduction” (pp. 1-13) Note: this Introduction is authored by Mary Schneider EnriquezAuthor: Mary Schneider EnriquezCriteria for Success:Below is the rubric that will be used to evaluate your Reading Response Assignments. You may use this rubric and the guidelines above to self evaluate whether you have done an excellent, satisfactory or insufficient job completing the assignment.RubricReading Response Rubric (1)Reading Response Rubric (1)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences2 to >1.5 ptsFull PointsFor both entries, student actively refers to at least 2 specifics from the reading(s) to support their reflections. It is clear through their discussion that they’ve read/viewed and engaged with ALL assigned material.1.5 to >1.0 ptsSufficient1 to >0.5 ptsRoom for ImprovementReferences to the reading content are somewhat vague, tangential, unrelated to the reading content or how it relates to art / one entry is missing0.5 to >0.0 ptsInsufficient0 ptsZeroNo clear references to the reading content / unclear that the student has truly read all materials2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePersonal reflection, interpretation, analysis and synthesis2 to >1.5 ptsFull PointsStudent actively engages with the content of the reading(s) using personal reflection, analysis, interpretation, and/or synthesis, foregrounding their own original thinking about the reading.1.5 to >1.0 ptsSufficient1 to >0.5 ptsRoom for ImprovementStudent’s response veers towards summarizing or telling what the reading was about / is vague, lacking in strong support details / lacks strong personal reflection / one entry is missing0.5 to >0.0 ptsInsufficient0 ptsZeroNo submissions / submissions are far too short / submissions do not respond clearly to the correct assigned readings2 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper attribution, quoting, paraphrasing1 to >0.75 ptsFull PointsStudent consistently attributes sources by name and title accurately and properly quotes and paraphrases when referring to someone else’s words or ideas.0.75 to >0.5 ptsSufficient0.5 to >0.25 ptsRoom for ImprovementStudent sometimes, but not consistently, quotes, paraphrases, and attributes by name the authors whose words/ideas they are sharing / one entry is missing0.25 to >0.0 ptsInsufficient0 ptsZeroStudent fails to properly attribute any sources by name/title, or to quote/paraphrase properly, thereby risking a situation of plagiarism.1 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLength1 to >0.75 ptsFull PointsThe BODY of the student’s response (not including headers, in-text citations, etc.) is between 200-300 words in length.0.75 to >0.5 ptsSufficient0.5 to >0.25 ptsRoom for ImprovementBoth responses are under the 200 word minimum by up to 25 words (between 175-199 words) / one response is more that 25 words below 200 or missing0.25 to >0.0 ptsInsufficient0 ptsZeroBoth responses are less than 175 words in length / one or both entries are missing1 ptsTotal Points: 6PreviousNex
Requirements: MLA | Essay | 1 pages, Double spaced

The post I’m working on a Writing exercise and need support.Total two entry (1 and 2) Eac appeared first on homework handlers.

I’m working on a Writing question and need guidance to help me study.. Our unique set of characteristics- genetics, age, sex, gender, sexual identity, economics, race, and ethnicity- along with our knowledge, beliefs, values, and skills frame the way we experience the world and guide our decisions/behaviors. One of the influencing characteristics is laws/public policies. These can include laws for wearing seat belts, the drinking age and not smoking in public buildings as well as policies related to school bullying and harassment in the workplace. Imagine you have the professional power (School Board, Company Owner, City Planner, Government Committee) to create a law or policy to change people’s health behavior. Describe a health problem that can be changed with a new policy. Use data to back up your problem (your textbook can be 1 resource as well as valid websites such as the CDC). Describe the steps you believe should be taken by government, companies, organizations and individuals to create change. It should be approximately 2 pages in length, double space, 12 pt font, and your choice of format (APA or MLA).PointsCriteria25Explain your health law/policy and your pretend leadership role20Include data points from at least 2 valid resources25Summarize why the law/policy is needed for change20Decide how the law/policy will create health behavior changes25Explain why some may oppose the law/policy115Total
Requirements: 2 pages

The post I’m working on a Writing question and need guidance to help me study.. Our uniqu appeared first on homework handlers.