Discussion: Leadership and Management: What Is the Difference? Leadership and ma

Discussion: Leadership and Management: What Is the Difference?
Leadership and management in social agencies are about starting things up, getting them done, and keeping them moving.
—Armand Lauffer
Leadership and management are two terms that are used interchangeably but represent different roles that have different functions. Understanding the differences and similarities is essential for social work administrators as they develop leadership strategies within organizations. Understanding the functions associated with leadership and management roles can influence how social workers supervise and work with colleagues in administrative practice. As you prepare for this Discussion, consider how your understanding of leadership and management roles might affect you when you assume a supervisory position.
Provide a 300-word Discussion Post 
–  An analysis of the similarities and differences of leadership and management roles as they relate to human services organizations. 
– Include how your understanding of these roles may affect you as you assume a supervisory position.
Support your post with 3 specific references to the resources. Be sure to provide full APA citations for your references.
Required Readings
Lauffer, A. (2011). Understanding your social agency (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Sage.
· Chapter 1, “Where Your Agency Came From and Where It’s Going” (pp. 2–31)
· Prequel to Chapter 2, “Meet the Staff Members” (pp. 35–37)
· Chapter 2, “Concepts, Theories, and Classifications” (pp. 38–65)
· Chapter 7, “Organizational Culture” (pp. 210–240)
· Chapter 8, “Leadership, Management, and Governance” (pp. 243–280)
Mulroy, E. A. (2004). Theoretical perspectives on the social environment to guide management and community perspectives: An organization-in-environment approach. Administration in Social Work, 28(1), 77–96.

The post Discussion: Leadership and Management: What Is the Difference?
Leadership and ma
appeared first on homework handlers.

Take note in each paragrapher ·  Read the attached sheets on left and right real

Take note in each paragrapher
·  Read the attached sheets on left and right realism. Design one quiz question for each of the focus points (see sheet – there are 3 focus points for left realism and 3 focus points for right realism so you will come up with 6 quiz questions in total).
·  Once you have read the sheets on left and right realism (and designed your 6 questions)
Left realist
Focus point 1: Why did Left Realists argue that a new approach was needed?
Focus point 2: How do Left Realists explain crime?
Focus point 3: what solutions do Left Realists offer to tackle crime?
Focus point 3: what solutions do Left Realists offer to tackle crime?
Right realism
Focus point 1: what does NOT cause crime according to Right Realists?
Focus point 2: what does cause crime according to Right Realists?
Focus point 3: what solutions are offered by Right Realists to tackle crime?
Left Realism
Focus point 1: Why did Left Realists argue that a new approach was needed?
Problems with the idealism of Marxist and Neo-Marxist approaches:
Left realists have argued that ‘left idealists’ have not provided policies on law and order as alternatives to  those provided by  right wing politicians who have portrayed themselves as the guardians of law and order.  They have been unable, therefore to counter the appeal of right wing policies. Can you see how Marxist and Neo-marxist approaches, as well as some interactionist research might be accused of this? 
A need to recognise realities of crime
Left realists focus on the reality of crime, rather than on who defines or creates laws and how crime is socially constructed – which left ‘idealists’ tend to.  They argue that some groups in society are particularly likely to be victims of crime – often those most powerless and that left idealists pay little attention to this. They argue that whilst middle class and corporate crime is likely to be under estimated in the figures, that it is still likely that poorer and more excluded members of society; including some ethnic minority groups, are more likely to perpetrate certain types of crime e.g. street crime. 
Acknowledging the ‘real’ problem of crime and fear of crime allows left realists to consider the implications on people e.g. women fearing going out in the dark
A need to counter some of the romanticised images of criminals
Left realists have criticised the image presented by some Marxist and neo-marxist  writers of criminals as promoting justice or fighting back against oppression (or Robin Hood type figures). E.g. most victims of robbery and burglary are themselves poor
Focus point 2: How do Left Realists explain crime?
Relative deprivation
Crime is seen as rooted in social conditions and closely related to deprivation, BUT, there is not a simple relationship between poverty / unemployment and crime. Many crimes are committed by more affluent members of society for example. What matters is whether deprivation is experienced as ‘relative deprivation’ e.g. compared to those around you or wider society. A consumer culture and the role of the media in advertising can play a big role in this. 
Subculture 
Groups of individuals experiencing relative deprivation will develop lifestyles that enable them to cope with the problem. Human creativity is emphasised – crime is only the response of a minority to this situation of oppression – other responses include Pentecostalism and Rastafarianism among second generation Caribbean immigrants. 
Marginalisation
Marginal groups are not well represented in society through organisations such as political affiliations, trade union membership, or other avenues through which their ‘voice’ might be heard. Marginalised groups are seen as more likely to resort to violence and rioting as forms of political action.
Focus point 3: what solutions do Left Realists offer to tackle crime?
Improve Policing
Policing needs to move to policing by consensus. Build up community relations etc… public confidence in the police needed to improve(especially in the 1980s context when the Brixton and Toxteth riots had occurred and at a time when the police were often seen as puppets of a right wing state e.g. policing of the miners strike)
Police rely greatly on the public – 90% of crimes known to police are brought to their attention by the public (Kinsley, Lea & Young, 1986) – if information from the public dries up due to lack of confidence, then police have to resort to tactics like stop and search or drift towards ‘military policiing’ – public confidence gets worse… vicious cycle
Community policing – needs to develop. Police should respond more to needs and desires of the communities they serve. Stop over-policing things like minor juvenile offences and focus on more serious crimes which they should investigate e.g. corporate crime, domestic violence, racially motivated attacks etc…
Tackle the social causes of crime
Redistribution of wealth needed – socialism. Reduce income inequalities. Changing policing alone will not solve the problem of crime.
Improve equality, opportunity and freedom of choice. Reduce unemployment, improve housing estates, provide better community facilities, leisure facilities etc…
The Square of Crime – a multifaceted approach needed.
Focus on the 4 elements – the state, the offender, the public (or informal social control) , the victim THE SQUARE OF CRIME.  Need to understand why people offend, what makes victims vulnerable, what affects public attitudes and what social factors influence the police and formal agencies of control.
Right realism
Associated with American sociologists James Q. Wilson and Richard Hernstein
Focus point 1: what does NOT cause crime according to Right Realists?
Poverty
Wilson argued that poverty was not an important factor in crime.  He gives the example that in the 1960s USA anti-poverty programmes happened alongside increases in crime. In addition to this, it should be noted that many poor people do not commit crime. 
Crime can neither be explained nor tackled through welfare programmes or policies to redistribute wealth
Focus point 2: what does cause crime according to Right Realists?
Wilson focused in particular on the rational calculations made by those who commit crime regarding the likely cost and benefits of their criminal actions
Later Wilson and Hernstein argued that there was a significant biological element to crime – some people are biologically predisposed to commit crime; this, alongside inadequate socialisation makes it more probable. 
Still focused on rational cost benefit – over generous welfare system makes crime pay – no need to work hard and hold a job down.
In their 1982 article ‘Broken  Windows’ Wilson and Kelling focused on how the physical environment can give cues to people about a lack of social control and can lead to more crime– indicating that  social rules have broken down – e.g in estates where windows are broken and graffiti is everywhere – people who are not criminals are scared to go out, this means that there is less informal social control  through the presence of law-biding citizens on the streets and those predisposed to commit crime are more likely to do so. 
Focus point 3: what solutions are offered by Right Realists to tackle crime?
Cost vs benefit – need to increase the cost or reduce the benefit to criminals:
BUT Simply increasing punishments is not the answer – so few get caught so it is not a good detterent. Swift and definite punishments might work but are not common.
Instead focus might be on things like methadone for heroin addicts (cost of heroin outweighs benefits) and making communities stronger so offenders have more to lose (standing in community) 
Wilson and kelling 1982 Broken Windows – police and councils must react to first signs of disintegration e.g remove broken windows quickly, police should use zero tolerance and clamp down on minor crimes to avoid deterioration
Also, focus on socialisation, nuclear family and strong communities.
Take note in each paragrapher
·  Read the attached sheets on left and right realism. Design one quiz question for each of the focus points (see sheet – there are 3 focus points for left realism and 3 focus points for right realism so you will come up with 6 quiz questions in total).
·  Once you have read the sheets on left and right realism (and designed your 6 questions)

The post Take note in each paragrapher
·  Read the attached sheets on left and right real
appeared first on homework handlers.

This week you will learn about the practice of UN peacekeeping and the controver

This week you will learn about the practice of UN peacekeeping and the controversy surrounding humanitarian interventions. These are interventions undertaken by a state or a group of states in the internal affairs of another state without their consent in order to prevent an atrocity like genocide, ethnic cleansing or war crimes. Opponents of humanitarian interventions argue that they violate the principle of sovereign non-interference and potentially encourage forms of neo-imperialism by the great powers. Proponents argue that the right to non-interference is contingent upon the willingness and capacity of the government to protect its population from atrocities, and sovereignty does not give governments the right to commit atrocities against their own people. 
The argument that humanitarian interventions should never be permitted effectively allows governments to commit genocide against their own people, but the alternative raises a host of difficult ethical and political questions.
Should humanitarian interventions be permissible? What level of harm should be the threshold beyond which such interventions should be permitted? Who should authorize these interventions? The UN Security Council? Regional organizations? Should unilateral humanitarian interventions be permitted?  
EXAMPLE…
Humanitarian intervention should be permissible under reasonable circumstances. The concept of state sovereignty and non-intervention have proven to allow governments to commit atrocities against their own people. Therefore, the inviolability of state sovereignty has to be modified.
State sovereignty takes second importance when active genocides, ethnic cleansings, mass persecutions, or civil wars, are taking place. The level of harm has to be the threshold; otherwise, states will be allowed to intervene all the time. There are no perfect countries that never undermine their citizens’ rights. There has to be a loosely defined limit that crossed by governments, state sovereignty can be broken. The level of harm has to be severe to justify the intervention.
In addition, states that violate the agreed norms and intervene without a justifiable reason should be held accountable for engaging in imperialist behavior. 
The interventions have to be authorized by international organizations. The UN Security Council is not the best option because the P5 can block the intervention if it is against one of their allies. I would suggest creating a new organization to monitor and authorize interventions or use the UN General Assembly, where everyone gets one vote and a majority is needed to start intervening. Regional organizations could give important information about the region and the conflict; however, they might not be powerful/reliable enough to issue such a demand. An intervention has to be authorized collectively by the global society, not just regionally. 
Unilateral interventions should not be explicitly prohibited. As long as the authorization has been given multilaterally, one country can engage in the intervention. However, if one state is allowed to determine on its own when to intervene single-handedly, then that would undermine state sovereignty. It has to be a multilateral decision! The states executing the intervention can be one, two, or as many as decided. 
State sovereignty is important and should be protected when there are no severe human rights violations. 

The post This week you will learn about the practice of UN peacekeeping and the controver appeared first on homework handlers.

W 5 Pa

 660 words

1).According to Deming (2000), what is a system?

2).What is Deming’s System of Profound Knowledge?

3).How can applying Deming’s view of theory help leaders and managers improve organizational performance?

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post W 5 Pa appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”