Michael Pollan Food Rules For Healthy People And Planet

/in /by

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c31cAdYUvT8 

1. List three characteristics of healthy people and explain why you agree or disagree, stating details from the video that you disagree or agree with. 

2. List three characteristics of a healthy planet and explain why you agree or disagree. You must use details from the video in or statement. You must also suggest three additional characteristics of healthy people and state why these additional characteristics should be added to the list and taken seriously. 

3. List at least three (3) food rules with which you agree and explain why you agree. You must use details from the video. You must come up with two additional food rules that were not part of the video, but that you think are worthy to be added to the list and say why your additional rules should be considered. 

4. Do you disagree with any of the food rules in this documentary and why? You must use details from the video. 

5. What is your personal opinion about the thoughts and ideas presented in this documentary?

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Michael Pollan Food Rules For Healthy People And Planet appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Clinical Information Systems Evaluation Paper

/in /by

Clinical Information Systems Evaluation Paper

For this assignment, consider the following scenario:

Your organization, a large outpatient treatment center in a major metropolitan area, just implemented an EHR system.  The system does one of three things (pick one, your choice):

Provides clinical decision support (CDS) to providers based on patient records/history/medications/etc. –OR–
Provides personalized health hints and educational information to patients based on patient records/history in the system as well as patient-generated data from devices (this option will be the hardest one!). –OR–
Takes free text (the regular “notes” written in paragraphs) from patient records, analyzes them using natural language processing,  and then automatically converts free text notes into ICD-10 diagnoses and medication lists.

What you need to do:  Propose and detail an evaluation of this system.
Things to consider to help you out:

-What makes a good EMR system, and what makes an EMR fail
For each ‘what’, How you would measure how good or bad the EMR system is
For each ‘how’, Benchmark the ideal measurement

Paper specifications:

Must be in APA format. In-text citations must be in APA format as well.
The paper needs to double-spaced, with 1 inch margins and size 12 Times New Roman font. The title page and references do not count toward the page limit. A minimum of 7 double-spaced pages are expected to adequately cover most topics.
***The paper MUST use and cite appropriate scholarly literature and other publications of acceptable quality. 6 or more total references from any peer or editor reviewed source, including newspapers, magazines, online professional resource sites, and corporate (NOT individual) blogs. *** PUBMED is a good resource or google scholar.

Recommended Structure.  The following structure is strongly recommended.  Word counts are approximate.
Abstract – 250 words maximum, summarize your evaluation, no citations.  This might be at             the beginning, but is the very last thing that you write!
Introduction & Background (~500-750 words)
-Briefly discuss your chosen EHR system component
-Define it
-Advantages
-Discuss factors and problems commonly encountered in your chosen EHR component
Proposed Methods & Benchmarks (~750-1000 words):
-What would you like to evaluate
-How would you measure it
-What benchmarks do you suggest for these measurements?
Phase I (immediately after implementation)
Phase II (12 months after implementation of the EHR system)
Conclusion & Discussion (~300-500 words)
Reference Bibliography (APA style)
All evaluation methods must be concrete.
Please read the bottom section of this page to learn more about what we mean by ‘concrete’.

About Concrete Evaluation Methods & Measures.

Although you’ve got the freedom to invent your own evaluation methods and measures, every method and measure you propose in your evaluation must be concrete.  For our purposes, that means the method and measure must be specific, directly observable, and be able to be captured (recorded) and the measure compared to a benchmark goal.  Things you can consider:

*Many concrete measures are quantitative (meaning, result in a number).  The number is then compared to a benchmark goal.
-Not really a good example: “Within 5 days of initial system installation, CPOE orders must be stored digitally.”
-Good example: “Within 5 days of initial system installation, at least 75% of CPOE orders must be stored digitally.”
* Qualitative methods can also be concrete because they can be quantitated into “yes/no/[maybe]” answers.  Qualitative methods typically need some inventive detail.
– NOT concrete: “If most physicians want to adopt the new EHR system, then the benchmark is met.”
-Concrete Evaluation: “Administer a single question survey to physicians that asks them ‘Would you be interested in this new EHR system?’ after handing them the brochures.
-Benchmark: The benchmark is reached if at least 50% of all physicians answer ‘yes’ or   ‘maybe’ to that question.”
-NOT concrete: “If the system stays up for 6 months, the benchmark is met.”
-Concrete Evaluation: “Check the system logs for outages over the first 6 months.
– Benchmark: If there is no outage, the benchmark is met.”
*Surveys might exist online for what you’re trying to measure.  If you can find one that’s peer or editor reviewed, then you should consider using it.
* Again, you might need to be inventive.  Often for your goals, no benchmark has ever been published for what you’re looking for and you will need to speculate/guess, and that is just fine.  Try benchmarks used in similar situations, even outside HIT.  Any source, including your own guess, is okay.

******I have attached the grading rubric for this paper, so please follow that.
****** i also attached my teachers frequently
encountered issues for this paper based on other students who turned in their paper. Very Helpful!

Number of Pages: 7 Pages

Deadline: 3 days

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post Clinical Information Systems Evaluation Paper appeared first on My Nursing Experts.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

a tour of the brain 4

/in /by

Pretend you are a tour guide giving a tour of the human brain. In a 1-2 page paper written in APA format using proper spelling/grammar, describe the tour you would give. Be sure to highlight the major parts of the brain, the control centers and their functions, and the importance of the brain as part of the central nervous system. Conclude your tour with a description of what happens to a person when damage occurs to a part of the brain.

Rasmussen’s Library and Learning Services team has developed a variety of Guides to help support students’ academic endeavors. For this project, the Writing Guide and APA Guide may both be helpful. You will find links to these Guides on the Resources tab.

Submit your completed assignment to the drop box below. Please check the Course Calendar for specific due dates.
Save your assignment as a Microsoft Word document. (Mac users, please remember to append the “.docx” extension to the filename.) The name of the file should be your first initial and last name, followed by an underscore and the name of the assignment, and an underscore and the date. An example is shown below:
 
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the required textbook chapters and articles for this week. Select two tests about which to write your review. The first test must be selected from List

/in /by

Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the required textbook chapters and articles for this week. Select two tests about which to write your review. The first test must be selected from List A and the second test must be selected from List B.  Your choice of tests include the following:

List A (Select one test from this list.)

  • Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition (WAIS–IV)
  • Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children- Fifth Edition (WISC-V)
  • Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence- Fourth Edition (WPPSI – IV)

List B (Select one test from this list.)

  • Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (Bayley-III)
  • Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children, Second Edition (KABC-II)
  • Kaufman Test of Educational Achievement, Third Edition (KTEA-3)
  • Sequential Tests of Educational Progress (STEP)
  • Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, Fifth Edition (SB5)
  • Wechsler Individual Achievement Test–Third Edition (WIAT- III)
  • Woodcock-Johnson IV (WJ IV) Tests of Achievement
  • Woodcock-Johnson IV (WJ IV) Tests of Cognitive Abilities

Create a PowerPoint presentation with 10-12 slides (not including the title and reference slides) entitled Review of [Insert the name of the tests reviewed]. Your presentation must provide at least one slide for each of the required topics and include appropriate citations of your referenced sources. Separate reference slides, which follow APA formatting guidelines for a References page, must be included at the end of the presentation. You must create your own template and organize your presentation in the sequence provided. Do not use a font smaller than 18 pt. You are encouraged to insert relevant figures and graphics. Make sure to appropriately cite any images, tables, figures, or information from the test publisher’s website used.  The notes section of each slide must include the text for oral comments you would make while presenting the materials to a live audience.

References must be cited according to APA guidelines as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.) For assistance with creating a visually engaging and readable presentation, you may review Garr Reynolds’s tips for creating presentations. (Links to an external site.)

The presentation must cover each of the following topics in the order presented below. Two tests may be discussed on the same slide using the side-by-side comparison format. Required topics to be addressed for each test:

  • Name of the test, author or authors, publisher and publication date
  • Qualifications of the test user
  • Common professional uses of the test
  • Explain what the test is purported to measure along with any reliability and validity evidence that supports the author’s or publisher’s claims.
  • Describe the appropriate applications of the test in terms of the population(s) on which the test is validated (including age ranges) and any information regarding populations for which the test’s use is not recommended.
  • Subtest names and brief descriptions
  • Administration and scoring procedures
  • Cost and administration time 
  • Your critique of the instrument, including an evaluation of the test’s strengths and weaknesses as a measure of the theoretical constructs of intelligence and/or achievement
  • Evaluate reviewers’ comments from at least one scholarly, peer-reviewed journal article published in the last 10 years that provides an appraisal of basic measurement issues related to the tests you selected.

The presentation

  • Must consist of 10 to 12 slides (not including title and reference slides) that are formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. (Links to an external site.) 
  • Must include a separate title slide with the following: 
    • Title of presentation
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use the assigned chapters in the course text and a minimum of 1 peer-reviewed journal article published within the last 10 years.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include separate reference slides formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center. 

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Order now and Get 10% Discount! Use Code “Newclient”

The post Prior to beginning work on this assignment, read the required textbook chapters and articles for this week. Select two tests about which to write your review. The first test must be selected from List appeared first on Psychology Homework.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”