SOC-481 Action Research Project Proposal

/in /by

 

 

 

 

 

SOC-481

Action Research Project Proposal

Assignment

 

Instructions: This is a three-part assignment, in which you develop a proposal for a viable action research project. The purpose of the proposal is to engage and inform potential funders of the project, as well as other key stakeholder groups invested in social change initiatives. The proposal should clearly and succinctly describe all aspects of your proposed project, clearly explaining what you will do and why. Please note that you are not required to implement the project as part of the SOC-481 coursework.

In PART 1 of the assignment, you will develop the initial sections of an action research proposal.

In PART 2, you will build upon and revise the initial sections of the proposal (as needed), adding the last sections of the proposal and completing a final draft of the proposal.

In PART 3, you will develop a PowerPoint presentation, to include an overview of your proposed project, as well as a completed SWOT Analysis which could potentially be used to guide further development of the proposed project.

____________________________________________________________________________

PART 2

Instructions

Use the instructor feedback you received to revise Part 1 of this assignment. Next, use Part 2 (below) to create the final draft of your community-based action research proposal. In a separate Word document, the completed proposal (not including the list of references) should be approximately 1,500-2,300 words and include the following:

Section Two-

1. Study Design and Data Collection Methods (750-800 words)

 

Action Research Approach

 

Provide an overview of the why and how of your proposed investigative approach and study design.

 

Recruitment of Community Participants and Partners

 

Briefly describe the approach you will take to recruit and engage community partners (e.g., organizations, service providers) and participants (such as individual members of the community, “change agents”).

 

Community Needs Assessment

 

Briefly explain the approach you will take to assess community needs and assets, and how information generated from the needs assessment will be used to advance project aims. Note specific data collection tools and methods you will use in this phase of the project (e.g., focus groups, surveys)

 

Community Planning and Capacity Building

 

Briefly describe what you will do to foster community connections, planning and decision-making processes, and individual and/or organization skills/capacities to support community change efforts.

 

2. Analytic Approach and Methods (150-250 words)

 

Briefly describe the processes and procedures you will follow to analyze collected data. Explain the purpose of analytic tools such as a SWOT analysis, and describe how you will use generated information.

 

3. Quality Control and Evaluation (250-400 words)

 

What steps will you take to strengthen the quality of the proposed project? If you are collecting and analyzing quantitative data, what will you do to strengthen study validity? If you are collecting and analyzing qualitative data, what will you do to strengthen trustworthiness of results?

 

Briefly describe the approach will you take to engage in formative and/or summative evaluation of the project/initiative as a whole (e.g., will you contract with an independent evaluator or will you adopt a participatory evaluation approach)?

 

4. Ethical Considerations (250-300 words)

 

Informed Consent

 

Briefly explain processes and procedures you will use to negotiate informed consent with study participants. How will you manage participant expectations and power differentials?

 

Confidentiality and Anonymity

With action research, confidentiality may be situational. Briefly describe how you will negotiate issues related to confidentiality, privacy, and attribution with study participants and partners.

 

Efforts to Limit Risk and Optimize Benefit

 

Briefly describe what you will do to limit potential risks and optimize potential benefits to individuals, organizations, or communities involved with, or affected by, the proposed initiative.

 

Describe what you will do to be sensitive to emergent ethical issues as they unfold over the course of the project.

 

5. Dissemination of Information and Community Learning (150-250 words)

 

Briefly describe the approach you will take to share gathered information and generate individual, organizational, and community knowledge building and learning related to the envisioned social change.

 

6. Project Significance (150-250 words)

 

Briefly explain the significance of this proposed project, and what it can potentially contribute to improving community conditions and/or advancing meaningful social change.

 

7. References

 

Incorporate information and supportive evidence from at least five scholarly sources of direct relevance to the proposed action research project.

 

8. Appendices (Optional)

 

Attach materials (e.g., charts, tables, diagrams) that clarify and/or elaborate upon information contained in the main body of the proposal.

 

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

 

 

 

 

© 2020. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

 

“Our Prices Start at $11.99. As Our First Client, Use Coupon Code GET15 to claim 15% Discount This Month!!”

The post SOC-481 Action Research Project Proposal appeared first on Coursework Geeks.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Group Work with Men Who Batter

/in /by

Social workers often work with nonvoluntary clients. This case study describes a group model of working with
such clients because of battering behavior.
Questions

  1. How can social workers respond to denial when working with nonvoluntary clients?
  2. How did the social worker use confrontation in working with the resistant client?
  3. What interventions contributed to the changes described in the client?
  4. How does group treatment address the special circumstances of men who batter?

Sam, a White 26-year-old laborer who lives in a working-class suburb, was referred by the court to a group
program for men who batter. He is employed full-time, earning about $20,000 annually. Sam has been arrested
three times. His most recent arrest was for the battery of his wife. He received 6 months’ probation and was
mandated to attend domestic violence counseling. He had two previous arrests, one for auto theft when he was
a teenager and one 2 years ago for disorderly conduct.
At the initial intake interview, Sam was secretive, and it seemed that he did not want the worker to know much
about him. His flat affect and deceptive manner made it appear that he thought the agency was out to get him
rather than help him. This type of presentation was not unusual for a court-ordered client. For the most part,
men who batter do not come to treatment voluntarily. They are generally either court-mandated or “wifemandated”; that is, their partners left or threatened to leave the relationship unless they receive counseling.
Our experience is that despite the men’S nonvoluntary status, they may be helped, and a court order can
actually facilitate progress when they might otherwise drop out. In fact, some evidence suggests that batterers’
contact with the criminal justice system in itself is effective in reducing violence (Sherman & Berk, 1984). In a
national study of 840 male batterers and their female partners, court-ordered participants were more likely to
complete the batterer intervention program and were less likely to reoffend than were participants who were in
the program voluntarily (Gondolf, 2002).
To enter the program, men must minimally be willing to admit that they have battered and to verbalize a
willingness to take responsibility for change. Ongoing denial of battering and responsibility for it is common and
expected and must be confronted throughout the treatment process.
An important step in the intake process is taking a history of past and current abuse. The history taking may be
facilitated by using structured interview protocols and checklists. In this case, the use of such checklists
revealed that Sam had a significant history of both psychological and physical maltreatment of his partner,
including interrupting her eating and sleeping; refusing to let her see people; frequently insulting, swearing, and
screaming at her; threatening to hit her; pushing, grabbing, and restraining her; slapping her; driving recklessly
to frighten her; throwing objects at her; hitting her with his fists; and hitting her with an object.
Generally, men who batter will minimize or deny their violent behavior. In addition, they may attempt to use the
treatment program manipulatively, perhaps to convince their partners not to leave them or to drop charges in
the court system. Treatment for the men can be stressful and can inadvertently increase the risk of abuse.
Therefore, contact with the men’S partners is crucial in delivering safe services. When Debbie was interviewed,
she corroborated Sam’S account of the violence. The fact that Sam accurately described his violent behavior
was a good sign that he could come to take responsibility for his behavior

Sample Solution

The post Group Work with Men Who Batter appeared first on homework handlers.

Flesh & Blood So Cheap-

/in /by

A legacy of the Triangle Fire described in Flesh and Blood So Cheap was the call for laws to protect workers’
rights. Writing multiple paragraphs answer the following questions:
What evidence is there that the health and safety of workers were not adequately protected at the Triangle
Shirtwaist Factory?
Why is it necessary for the government to protect the health and safety of workers?
Begin with a clear thesis statement.
Support your writing with evidence and inferences drawn from the text.
Part B:
Resilience comparison: How did New York remain resilient during the fire in 1911 and then again with the
attacks of the twin towers? What can we learn from their resilience?

Sample Solution

The post Flesh & Blood So Cheap- appeared first on homework handlers.

How culture influence politics and security issues in Latin America

/in /by

How does culture influence politics and security issues in Latin America? Please provide specific examples. What are the most pressing political and/or security issues in Latin America?

Sample Solution

The post How culture influence politics and security issues in Latin America appeared first on homework handlers.