2,500-word essay. Answer one (only 1) of the following questions and answer in e

/in /by

2,500-word essay. Answer one (only 1) of the following questions and answer in essay format Questions: To what extent is defining strategy problematic? Why is it difficult to conceive of and execute good strategy? Assess the contemporary relevance of a classical strategist of your choice. Clausewitz is arguably the most commonly cited strategic thinker. To what extent is there a consensus on how his key ideas should be interpreted? In what ways do key maritime and air theorists agree on strategic principles and why? How important were the nuclear strategists to the evolution of strategic thought? Evaluate the potential impact of one of the following upon future strategy: -Cyber capabilities -Artificial intelligence -Space power What are the most likely characteristics of the future strategic environment?

The post 2,500-word essay. Answer one (only 1) of the following questions and answer in e appeared first on homework handlers.

What, in your view, is the strongest objection against Plato’s version of the Gu

/in /by

What, in your view, is the strongest objection against Plato’s version of the Guise of the Good thesis? Evaluate Plato’s reply to this objection. 1. You must discuss Evans and/or Barney. 2. The paper should include the following: a. An exposition of the Platonic version of the guise of the good thesis. b. An exposition of what you take to be the strongest objection against it (you are not required to compare this objection with whatever you take to be a weaker objection.). c. A possible reply on behalf of the Platonic view. d. An evaluation of the back-and-forth. Basic Instructions 1. You must answer one and only one question. 2. Please submit the paper to D2L, under Assignment à Midterm. 3. You may use any of the usual citation styles (APA, Chicago, etc.) as long as you do it consistently. 4. Give your paper a title (this is just for fun, and won’t be graded)! Rubrics 1. Clarity 25% ? Most sentences are clear, short and to the point. Technical terms are defined, clarified, and used only when necessary. Ambiguous expressions are avoided. 2. Organization/structure 25% ? The paper has a clear thesis statement, stated early in the paper. ? The structure of the paper makes sense (e.g., the philosophical problem is introduced ? a positive proposal is put forward ? a counter-argument is considered ? an evaluation of the counter-argument is offered ? a conclusion is reached). ? The structure of the paper is made explicit (e.g., different points are separated by paragraphs; there are bridging sentences that flag and explain transitions, etc.) ? Rule of thumb: Suppose I read only the first sentence of each of your paragraphs. I should be able to understand the outline of your paper. 3. Comprehension 25% ? You can reproduce the arguments and views of philosophers we have read in your own words. ? Your questions and/or critical comments show a good understanding of what is at stake. 4. Creativity / Originality: 25% ? This portion mostly depends on the quality of the evaluative part of the paper. ? But you could also get creative with examples, or show intellectual curiosity by considering aspects of the text that we didn’t directly address, etc.

The post What, in your view, is the strongest objection against Plato’s version of the Gu appeared first on homework handlers.

1.Explain how research has evolved since the Florence Nightingale era. 2.Discuss

/in /by

1.Explain how research has evolved since the Florence Nightingale era. 2.Discuss how research and EBP are different; include how you believe research supports EBP for nursing. 3. Describe one past/historical unethical breach of research conduct; then, share how you would ensure care of a study participant using one ethical or legal research consideration (guideline/principle). I would like one citation from our text book which is: Houser, J. (2018). Nursing research: Reading, using, and creating evidence

The post 1.Explain how research has evolved since the Florence Nightingale era. 2.Discuss appeared first on homework handlers.

1. In no less than 3 pages (Front page/Body, Body and Citing Page) describe the

/in /by

1. In no less than 3 pages (Front page/Body, Body and Citing Page) describe the evolution of Ignition systems starting with a hot chamber ignition source, points and condenser as well as electronic ignition systems and how timing advancement has evolved to where we are at today. 2. The paper should be written in 11 or 12 font, double-spaced except for new paragraphs, which should be indented. 3. The third page will include the citing of all sources of information at the end of the article in an MLA format

The post 1. In no less than 3 pages (Front page/Body, Body and Citing Page) describe the appeared first on homework handlers.