Hi there, I want somebody to write me a discussion paper about this prompt:

The Bureau of Economic Analysis provides data for real private nonresidential fixed investment in table form at www.bea.gov. Follow these steps prior to posting to this forum:

1. Access the BEA interactively by first clicking on the tab titled “National.”
2. Next, click on “Interactive Tables: GDP and the National Income and Product Account (NIPA) Historical Tables.”
3. Click on “Begin Using the Data.”
4. Then, scroll down to click on “Section Five” and then scroll down until you find Table 5.3.5, “Private Fixed Investment by Type.”
5. Examine the data and respond to the following questions in your response. Do not simply “list” your answers to the questions. Instead, organize your responses into a coherent narrative response.

Has recent real private nonresidential fixed investment been volatile (as measured by percentage change from previous quarters)? Which is the largest component of this type of investment, (a) structures, (b) equipment and software, or (c) intellectual property products? Which of these components has been more volatile? How do recent quarterly percentage changes compare with the previous years’ changes? Looking at the investment data, what investment forecast would you make for the upcoming year (feel free to be specific)?

Here are what you have to do:

For each discussion activity, an initial response of approximately 500-750 words is required. Responses to the prompt should thoroughly, yet concisely, address each element of the discussion prompt. When appropriate, informal in-text citations as well as informal bibliographic entries (at the end of the post) should be used. External sources may also be utilized. When posting, students will be unable to view classmates’ contributions until they have made a post to the forum. There is no requirement for student interaction via the forum, as significant class time will be set aside for in-class discussion. Discussion contributions will be graded using the rubric below. Late submissions to discussion are not accepted for credit.

Discussion Rubric		/points possible
	The student offers an initial post to the prompt that fully addresses the prompt and offers depth of analysis commensurate with postsecondary academic work. Typically, initial posts will be from 500-750 words in length.	/50
	The student uses proper grammar, spelling, and format in the initial post to the discussion forum.	/50
	TOTAL POINTS/POINTS POSSIBLE	/100

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post write a discussion about a prompt appeared first on Top Premier Essays.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

---

Assignment 1: Loopholes and Technicalities 
You may have observed such a situation before: A highly publicized and outrageous crime has taken place, and the suspect is on trial for the entire world to see. It is clear in the media that the defendant is guilty of a heinous crime, and the case is a slam dunk. Then, the unthinkable happens—the defendant is found not guilty!
You are a defense attorney representing a previously convicted child sex offender. Your client has been incarcerated for five years, and the state provides you with new documents that indicate that the process by which the deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) lab conducted tests was not in accordance with the generally accepted protocols that govern DNA testing. As a result, although any DNA contamination (which could clear your client) was unlikely, it is just possible that your client was wrongly convicted. You file a motion to have the case against your client dismissed because of the possibility of DNA contamination. Because your client probably committed a heinous act against a child, you discover the next morning that your e-mail inbox is full of hate mail and your voicemail is also full of messages from people who are outraged by your actions, trying to free your client on a “loophole.”
Submission Details:
By Week 4, Day 3, in at least 250 words, post to the Discussion Area your answers to the following questions:

Is a loophole ever really a loophole? Answer on the basis of the information provided and the scenario.
Why do attorneys defend the constitutional rights of defendants so vigorously?
How are the victims of crimes served by these defenses, if at all?
In the given case, how will you react to the hate mail? In the context of the heinous crime described in the scenario, what are the legal and ethical considerations that you need to look at while defending this case from the angles of both the victim and the defender? 

By Week 4, Day 7, read and respond to at least two of your classmates’ posts by commenting on their examples and explanations.
Discussion Grading Criteria and Rubric
All discussion assignments in this course will be graded using a rubric. This assignment is worth 40 points. Download the discussion rubric and carefully read it to understand the expectations.
 
 

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

---