HUM101 Chamberlain Evidence Based Practice Bibliography and Source Evaluation

Attached is more instructions that needed to be followed
Required ResourcesRead/review the following resources for this activity:

InstructionsUse the Source Evaluation Worksheet to submit an annotated bibliography of 5 sources that you intend to use in your paper. Prepare a citation, annotation, and evaluation for each source.
You may collect the worksheets together as one document or you may submit a separate worksheet for each source.
Click on the following link for an example of an annotation.
Link: Annotation Example
Waite, L. J., Goldschneider, F. K., & Witsberger, C. (1986). Nonfamily living and the erosion of traditional family orientations among young adults. American Sociological Review, 51, 541-554.
The authors, researchers at the Rand Corporation and Brown University, use data from the National Longitudinal Surveys of Young Women and Young Men to test their hypothesis that nonfamily living by young adults alters their attitudes, values, plans, and expectations, moving them away from their belief in traditional sex roles. They find their hypothesis strongly supported in young females, while the effects were fewer in studies of young males. Increasing the time away from parents before marrying increased individualism, self-sufficiency, and changes in attitudes about families. In contrast, an earlier study by Williams cited below shows no significant gender differences in sex role attitudes as a result of nonfamily living.
Writing Requirements (APA format)

Length: 100-150 words per source (not including title page or references page)
1-inch margins
Double spaced
12-point Times New Roman font
Title page

GradingThis activity will be graded using the Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric.
Course Outcomes (CO): 3, 5
Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday
Rubric
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts
Annotated Bibliography Grading Rubric – 50 pts
Criteria
Ratings
Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quantity of Sources

5.0 pts 5 or more sources

4.25 pts 4 sources

3.75 pts 3 sources

3.0 pts 2 sources

0.0 pts 1 or no sources

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Quality /Reliability of Sources

5.0 pts All works are from scholarly sources.

4.25 pts Most works are from scholarly sources; no more than 1 from a substantive source.

3.75 pts Some works are from scholarly sources; no more than 2 from substantive sources.

3.0 pts Sources substantive or lower in quality.

0.0 pts Few or no sources reach even substantive level; popular sources cited.

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Recency of Sources

5.0 pts All sources less than 5 years old; if older, historical significance explained

4.25 pts 1 source older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.75 pts 2 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

3.0 pts 3 sources older than 5 years w/no explanation of historical significance

0.0 pts 4 or more sources older than 5 years old w/no explanation of historical significance

5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing Fluency of Annotations

25.0 pts All annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; clearly conveying main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

21.25 pts Most annotations comprehensively describe scope source material; give sense of main idea and relationship of ideas in source to the topic and thesis of the essay and how source will be used in essay.

18.75 pts Annotations are well-written but do not describe scope of source material; do not give clear idea of how source will be used in essay.

12.0 pts Annotations do not describe scope of source material and/or do not give idea of how they will be used in essay.

0.0 pts Annotations lack detail, give no idea of how they will be used in essay OR no annotations.

25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA and Documentation

10.0 pts Citations are formatted correctly.

8.5 pts There are a few formatting errors.

7.5 pts There are some formatting errors.

6.0 pts There are many and/or frequent formatting errors.

0.0 pts There is little or no adherence to APA format in the document.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


Soil In Construction 19534837

 

Assignment

Complete  Problems 4 and 5 at the end of  chapter 10.

Textbook:   Soil in Construction: 6th Edition – W. L. Schroeder, S.E. …

If you need access to textbook please let me know

if you can do it please don’t contact me   suggesting reference to the figure 5-17 and 10-5 and 10-6. 

 

“Looking for a Similar Assignment? Get Expert Help at an Amazing Discount!”

The post Soil In Construction 19534837 appeared first on My Perfect Tutors.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC RELATIONS IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS

Read the Article, THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC RELATIONS IN BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS How do the authors define culture? How do the authors define public relations? What is the impact of culture and public relations in a business organization? How could you recreate this study?

essay 3065092 2

 

http://score.rims.k12.ca.us/activity/cabinet/pres-sea.gif

Office of the President of the United States

1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

Washington, D.C. 20500

 

 

Dear Cabinet Member:

Prior to the next cabinet meeting you must submit a report on your highest priority program. The purpose of this report is to inform me of your priority program for the upcoming fiscal year. Please give me details on why your highest ranking program should be included in this year’s budget proposal. In your report, include necessary documentation including any supporting graphics and testimonials that you believe necessary to make your case for support of this program.

I look forward to seeing your report and I await your recommendations on how the federal government can continue its most critical programs in these times of economic restraint.

Sincerely yours,

 

The President of the United States

 


ASSIGNMENT OVERVIEW

Washington, D.C. is an extremely competitive, political town and you must work hard to keep your agency an important part of government. It’s the beginning of the legislative calendar and you must compete with other agencies and departments for a part of the budget and a high profile emphasis from the president.  

Choose which federal executive department you would like to represent (see list below).  Identify a current or new program that you will present to the president as a priority for your department.  Write a report to the president describing the problem and the program that will alleviate the problem.  You may prepare charts, tables and graphs to explain your plans to the President.

DETAILS

1.  Submit a written report addressed to the president.  A quality report will probably be between 750-1000 words.  However, the president cares more about clarity and detail than length – charts and other visual aids may be more valuable than word count.

2.  You should use at least 5 quality sources to research and clarify your report.  When appropriate, the sources should be cited within the report using MLA or APA style.  A complete bibliography should be attached to the report. A bibliography includes all sources from which you gathered information.  

3.  The president wants to focus on your ideas, not your errors.  Be sure to check for clarity and appropriate word usage; complete sentences; correct grammar, spelling and punctuation. 

4.  As the head of your department you should demonstrate substantial understanding about your department and your priority program. 

5.  In order to get a favorable response from the president, be sure to follow all guidelines as outlined in the attached rubric.  

6.   In the report describe the top priority program for your department:

·      How does this program fit into the official mission of your department? 

·      Why is your department best suited to run this program?

·      Is this a new program or an existing program?

·      What problem does the program solve?  How significant is the problem?  Give evidence, not anecdote.

·      What is the estimated fiscal impact of the program and how does it fit into your department’s budget?

·      Why should the program be important to the president?

RESOURCES

The Federal Executive Departments can be individually accessed through the following homepages:

The President’s Cabinet:          http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/cabinet.html

Department of Agriculture:       http://www.usda.gov/

Department of Commerce:      http://www.doc.gov/

Department of Defense:           http://www.defenselink.mil/

Department of Education:        http://www.ed.gov/

Department of Energy:              http://www.energy.gov/

Department of Health and Human Services:     http://www.hhs.gov/

Department of Housing and Urban Development:  http://www.hud.gov/

Department of the Interior:       http://www.doi.gov/

Department of Justice:              http://www.usdoj.gov

Department of State:                 http://www.state.gov/

Department of Transportation: http://www.dot.gov/

Department of the Treasury:    http://www.ustreas.gov/

Department of Veterans Affairs:      http://www.va.gov/

Department of Homeland Security:       http://www.dhs.gov/

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This assignment was based on a Cabinet Meeting Simulation written by Bob O’Conner and available on the SCORE website.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post essay 3065092 2 appeared first on Essay Writers.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”