You work at a high school as a teacher delivering courses for building computer skills. In addition, you help to support the computing needs of the high school working with the one IT person who recently accepted a job at a different school. The high school is in the process of hiring a new IT person. The timing could not have been worse as the high school is involved in a big project to improve their information systems and technology.
You were asked to join a discussion between the high school administration and information system vendors on the information and technology needs at the high school based upon your background, education, and experience. In preparation for the upcoming meeting, you received an e-mail from the principal with questions about the project:
Why should we have separate databases and a data warehouse?
Why don’t we just have one large database for all our data, both current and historical?
How would we use a data warehouse, and how would it help this high school?
Are there other information systems we should consider?
How would a mobile wireless network impact the educational process here?
In a 1,500–1,750-word e-mail response, provide detailed answers to their questions including a recommendation for the high school’s technology plan. Make sure your paper is written in the APA style and fully supports your opinion and arguments you make. Cite any sources you used to support your argument.
Please submit your assignment.
For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.
Grading Criteria
Project Criteria
Exceeds: 90%–100%
Very Good: 80%–89%
Meets: 70%–79%
Needs Improvement: Below 70%
Content (65%)
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content.
Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment.
Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication(20%)
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar.
Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar.
Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and may distract from the message. Organization is a bit unclear. Format is inconsistent. The writing was of collegiate level with several errors in spelling or grammar.
Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. The format is inadequate and obscures meaning. The writing was less than collegiate level with numerous errors in spelling or grammar.
Supporting Analysis(15%)
Analysis exceeds minimum requirements. Sources are used to support analysis, are appropriate, and are properly referenced.
Basic analysis provided to support assertions. Sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.
Limited analysis provided to support assertions. Some sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced.
No or inaccurate analysis, no sources are cited when needed, analysis and/or sources are not appropriate. When sources are used, they are not properly referenced.
“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”
