An Account of My Hut

What values does Chomei assign to the city in his essay? What values does he assign to the country where his hut is located? What roles does “culture” (art, music, etc.) play for Chomei? Why is his essay considered by most emblematic of Japanese medieval culture?

Sample Solution

The post An Account of My Hut appeared first on homework handlers.

IMP 1 correction

attached my IMP1 Assigment

and this is my touter feedback

Feedback from Reconciler Given after submission of IMP1

How well did your work meet the IMP 1 criteria?

  • A reasonably good attempt has been made at addressing the assignment brief. However, there are a few issues that if addressed, will improve the work.
  • In the first instance a closer alignment with the requirements of the assignment would have been beneficial.
  • The work is somewhat descriptive and requires greater critical analysis.

please add 1000 word in the assignment on feedback point mentioned

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post IMP 1 correction appeared first on Top Premier Essays.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


argument authority eng 102

Assignment 1: Discussion Question

By Saturday, June 29, 2013, of Module 2, post in the Discussion Area at least one current-day advertisement where the Argument by Authority fallacy is present. Describe the syllogism that makes this a fallacy. Take care to be certain that you post an Argument by Authority fallacy only.

By Tuesday, July 2, 2013, post a critique of at least two other students’ posts. Have they found solid examples of argument by authority, are there other fallacies present, or are the advertisements well written, with a true authority in place as needed?

Discussion question responses should be at least one-half double-spaced page in length. Your responses to your peers’ writing should be a substantive paragraph in length and should include specifics from the text if you are attempting to make a point.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post argument authority eng 102 appeared first on Essay Writers.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”


response to discussion below

Sara,
Reid v. Covert (1957) was quite an interesting case to say the least. Clarice Covert was the wife of an Air Force sergeant who was stationed on a United States Air Force (USAF) airbase in England, where they both lived. Clarice Covert was charged with murdering her husband, the sergeant, and was then tried and convicted in a military court martial, even though she was a civilian and not in the military. Afterward, “she was brought to the United States and confined in the Federal Reformatory for Women” in Alderson, West Virginia (Casetext, n.d.)
On an appeal, “the United States Court of Military Appeals set aside her conviction on grounds not material here, and she was transferred to the District of Columbia (D.C.) jail to await a rehearing by court-martial” (Castext, n.d.). It was there that Clarice “filed for a writ of habeas corpus in the U.S. District Court for D.C.,” where she alleged that she was not subject to court martials because of the unconstitutionality of Article 2 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 50 U.S.C. § 552. Afterward, the District Court “ordered the writ to issue, and the Government appealed directly to this Court” (Casetext, n.d.). In the end, it was decided that U.S. civilians outside of the country could not be tried by military court martial and that they still retained their Constitutional rights. They can only be tried by jury.
This case is relevant to homeland security policy because it makes the important distinction between the rights of U.S. civilian citizens abroad and non-citizens. The case dictates that U.S. civilian citizens retain their Constitutional rights, to include a trial by jury, even in such cases as these that involve the military. If this were to be a case against a non-citizen, it could have become a military tribunal, though I am not certain what would have been the case had it been a UK citizen or another nationality. Perhaps it would have been handled between the UK government and the US government/military? It is very interesting to think about.
References:
Casetext. (n.d.) Reid v. Covert. Retrieved from https://casetext.com/case/reid-v-covert
The post response to discussion below appeared first on Submit Your Homeworks.
response to discussion below was first posted on February 25, 2021 at 3:24 am.©2019 "Submit Your Assignment". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”