week 3 hu 240 compare and contrast religions

/in /by

Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions

Submit Assignment

  • Due Sunday by 10:59pm

  • Points
     85

  • Submitting a text entry box or a

    file
    upload

Instructions

Contrast: Religions


Evaluation
Title: Compare and Contrast Religions

At the end of unit 3, use the attached Comparison Chart to compile a table that compares and contrasts the foundational concepts and tenets of:

  1. Hinduism
  2. Judaism
  3. Christianity
  4. Islam
  5. Atheism
  6. Buddhism

Include in the comparison:

  1. the relationship to God(s)
  2. relationship to people
  3. primary scriptures
  4. primary rules of conduct
  5. at least 4 primary beliefs

Using the analysis that you did for the comparison table, explain what you think about each of the different categories of religions.

  • How does the diversity of religious beliefs benefit all mankind on the planet?
  • How do people use the diversity of religious beliefs to cause conflicts between groups of people?
  • Why do you think that so many people ignore the similarities between the different religions and only focus on the ways that they are divided?

Please be sure to validate your opinions and ideas with citations and references in APA format.

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Assignment File:

HU240 Unit 3 Assignment Comparison ChartPreview the document [Word Document]

Rubric

HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions

HU240 Unit 3 Assessment – Compare and Contrast Religions
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent
27.0 pts

Level 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis
27.0 pts

Level 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 24.0 pts

Level 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 22.0 pts

Level 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 19.0 pts

Level 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 16.0 pts

Level 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 pts

Level 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

 14.0 pts

Level 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

 12.0 pts

Level 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

 11.0 pts

Level 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

 9.0 pts

Level 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 pts

Level 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

 6.0 pts

Level 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

 2.0 pts

Level 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

 1.0 pts

Level 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

 0.0 pts

Level 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA
6.0 pts

Level 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

 5.0 pts

Level 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

 4.0 pts

Level 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

 3.0 pts

Level 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

 2.0 pts

Level 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

 0.0 pts

Level 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts

Total Points: 85.0

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.


Buy Custom Nursing Papers

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

continuous problem city monroe 2015 edition twelve

/in /by

I have a continuous problem that needs to be completed.  I have attached the problem itself, and the spreadsheet templates to make things easier and a little faster. 

 

I am looking for the answers to the problem I ATTACHED.  Not previous versions of this problem.  Numbers must match the pdf file.

 

I am also looking to have it within 24-30 hours or so. So latest tomorrow please.

 

I need someone who is good at this and will be able to get me a perfect grade.

 

Thank you in advance.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post continuous problem city monroe 2015 edition twelve appeared first on Essay Writers.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Final audit report assignment | Urgent Homeworks

/in /by

Write a financial audit report reflecting a qualified opinion. Any scope limitations or violations from GAAP are not significant enough to cause a disclaimer due to issues of materiality. Although the Sam’s Super Deli is privately owned, it has borrowed money from a local bank. The investment group that owns the bank requires the audit report done in accordance with GAAP for the year ending December 31, 2016.
The report should expose departures from GAAP standards; be specific. What evidence of the departure from GAAP do you have? Be sure to be specific enough so that your client can make your recommended changes. Do not forget to mention what the company is doing right as well as wrong. Create a nice tone to meld the two together sounding positive while pointing out what is not conforming. Mention opportunities for improvement.
Your qualified opinion is based on the following facts. A few sentences addressing each will be enough.

• Petty cash is $1000 which seems excessive. The cash is used for office supplies, lunches and other minor expenses. The receipts rarely tie to the cash box. Also, the office supplies are being directly expensed to the income statement instead of being capitalized and expensed as they are used.

• The year-end inventory was taken before the start of the audit; you were not there for the inventory.

• The company is using replacement cost as opposed to lower of cost or market.

• A delivery truck purchased for $7000 was expensed rather than capitalized. The owner based this on the assumption that the truck would have only two years of useful life.

• Some of the accounts payable invoices and aging schedules are not available as three boxes of documentation were damaged by a water heater flooding the area where those records are kept.

• In December, a paycheck was issued to the owner for $50,000. The owner then gave the employees cash bonuses equal to the net amount of his/her paycheck. it is up to you to decide if this is a departure from GAAP or a justifiable way to give bonuses. An argument could be made either way. Only refer to GAAP; don’t mention any IRS issues or ramifications regarding this transaction.

The audit report should have only the following:
Title page, Introduction, Body, Conclusion, any Appendices (if you must have them).
Your report should be two- three pages, maximum, NOT counting the title page and any appendices you may use.
Do not use boilerplate language. Find a way to write this report in plain, clear, and concise English. You want your client, Sam, to understand what you have written.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

final project xacc 280 1750 2050 word paper which you provide comprehensive analysis

/in /by

The final project for XACC 280 is a 1,750- to 2,050-word paper in which you provide a comprehensive analysis of the financial health of two companies, compare the companies, and make recommendations to improve the financial status of each. The paper, with citations and references, must follow APA formatting guidelines. The final project is designed so you can apply the concepts and skills learned in this course to a real-life financial accounting analysis. It incorporates your foundational knowledge—resulting from completion of Discussion questions, CheckPoints, Exercises, and Assignments—into a paper that describes your financial analyses and conclusion. The paper will include the following: • An introductory paragraph with: o A statement of the purpose of your paper. o A synopsis of what readers can expect to find in the paper. It is best to write this after writing the rest of the paper. • Vertical analyses for both companies. You can use your calculations from the Checkpoint Ratio, Vertical, and Horizontal Analyses, providing you show your work. • Horizontal analyses for both companies. You can use your calculations from the Checkpoint Ratio, Vertical, and Horizontal Analyses, providing you show your work. • Ratio analyses for both companies, including a test of: o Liquidity. You can use the Current Ratio you compute in the Checkpoint Ratio, Vertical, and Horizontal Analyses, and another ratio. Show your work. o Solvency. Use at least two ratios and show your work. o Profitability. Use at least two ratios and show your work. • An explanation of which company appears to be more financially sound: o Each company might have strengths in different areas. Be sure to distinguish these areas; for example, one might have greater liquidity, while the other more solvency. o Point to the data for each comparison you make. • At least three recommendations you can make, within the context of law and ethics, so each company can improve its financial health. • A concluding paragraph that summarizes what you did, what you found, and what you recommend. As you compare the two companies, you might find it beneficial to use a table or a spreadsheet with columns for each company, so the reader can easily compare their ratios by looking across a row. Discuss your findings in a brief narrative, then move on to the next part of your analysis using a similar table or a spreadsheet and an explanation.

 

Review the annual reports for PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company in Appendixes A & B, especially the Consolidated Statements of Income and the Balance Sheets on pp. A4, A6, B1, & B2 of Financial Accounting.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post final project xacc 280 1750 2050 word paper which you provide comprehensive analysis appeared first on Essay Writers.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”