In the land of free trade, the public does not view all industries as equal. Do

/in /by

In the land of free trade, the public does not view all industries as equal. Do you believe that is ethical? Do you believe that some industries are unfairly targeted? Should it be consumers’ choice to partake in products that are not healthy for them, or do those companies have an ethical obligation to protect people?
In this assignment, you will choose one of the following industries to frame your paper:
•    The pharmaceutical industry.
•    The payday loan industry.
•    Cloning for medical purposes.
Once you’ve gone through the worksheet and answered all the questions you will take that information and write your paper. It will basically be a transfer of information from the worksheet to a paper format.
Do not just turn in the worksheet. It will be sent back for a rewrite.
1.    Choose an industry.
2.    Will you be an advocate for the consumer or the industry?
3.    Develop 3 reasons why you support the consumer or the industry.
•    Reason 1.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
•    Reason 2.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
•    Reason 3.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
4.    Is it possible for a company to cater to both its best interest and that of the consumer simultaneously, or does one always have to prevail?
•    Reason 1.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
•    Reason 2.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
•    Reason 3.
o    Supporting evidence for that reason.
Use at least two quality references. Note: Wikipedia and similar Websites do not qualify as academic resources.

The post In the land of free trade, the public does not view all industries as equal. Do appeared first on homework handlers.

BUS303 Grantham Negotiating Tactics Selling Your Audio System Paper

/in /by

Trying to Sell Your Audio System

You are trying to sell your audio system (an amplifier and speakers) to raise money for an upcoming trip to overseas. The system works great, and audiophile friend tell you that if he were in the market for this kind of equipment (which he isn’t), he’d give you $500 for it. A few days later the first potential buyer comes to see the system. The buyer looks it over and asks a few questions about it. You assure the buyer that the system works well. When asked how much, you tell the buyer that you have already had an offer for $500. The buyer purchases the system for $550.

  • Justify and explain your decision to lie about having the second offer, and what were the consequences of your decision to lie to the buyer.

The requirements below must be met for your paper to be accepted and graded:

  • Write between 750 – 1,250 words (approximately 3 – 5 pages) using Microsoft Word in APA style, see example below.
  • Use font size 12 and 1” margins.
  • Include cover page and reference page.
  • At least 80% of your paper must be original content/writing.
  • No more than 20% of your content/information may come from references.
  • Use at least three references from outside the course material, one reference must be from EBSCOhost. Text book, lectures, and other materials in the course may be used, but are not counted toward the three reference requirement.
  • Cite all reference material (data, dates, graphs, quotes, paraphrased words, values, etc.) in the paper and list on a reference page in APA style.

References must come from sources such as, scholarly journals found in EBSCOhost, CNN, online newspapers such as, The Wall Street Journal, government websites, etc. Sources such as, Wikis, Yahoo Answers, eHow, blogs, etc. are not acceptable for academic writing.

The post BUS303 Grantham Negotiating Tactics Selling Your Audio System Paper appeared first on Brainy Term Papers.

BUS303 Grantham Negotiating Tactics Selling Your Audio System Paper was first posted on February 2, 2021 at 5:43 pm.
©2019 "Brainy Term Papers". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post BUS303 Grantham Negotiating Tactics Selling Your Audio System Paper first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

comparison-contrast-topic-selection

/in /by

As a student, you will encounter many different types of writing assignments, each with its own requirements. One of the most common is the comparison-contrast essay, in which you focus on the ways that certain things or ideas are similar to and/or different from one another. By writing such essays, you are being encouraged to do the following:

  • Make connections between texts or ideas.
  • Engage in critical thinking.
  • Go beyond describing or summarizing.

When reflecting on similarities and differences, you can gain a better understanding of the items you are comparing–their relationship to each other and what is most important about them.

During the next five weeks, you will write and revise a five-paragraph comparison-contrast essay that incorporates at least three peer-reviewed academic sources. Each week, you must submit a different phase of your writing to complete the essay.

Refer to pp. 203 to pp. 220 of Ch. 10 of Wordsmith for ideas on topics you may wish to write about in your paper; however, feel free to come up with your own idea.

Based on the chapter 10 the following are some of the topics you can pick

Topics for Comparison-Contrast Writing

1. discuss the differences in the way an optimist and a pessimist might approach life. It might help to select three areas such as work, school, relationships, finances, or religion and write a paragraph comparing and contrasting each point.

2. Write an essay explaining some of the differences between high school and college.

3. In five years, how will your life be different from the way it is today? In this essay, be sure to contrast the present and the future rather than simply discussing your plans for the future.

Decide on your topic.

Experiment with some of the prewriting methods found in Ch. 2 of Wordsmith to explore the topic you have chosen.

Write a 350- to 700-word document detailing your application of your writing process and chosen prewriting method (freewriting, brainstorming, listing, etc.) to begin exploring and writing about your topic. In this document, you should include the topic you have chosen and some examples of how you plan to compare and/or contrast.

Edit and proofread your assignment before submitting it to your instructor.

Format your assignment according to appropriate course-level APA guidelines.

Submit your document to the Assignment Files tab.

Note: The term five-paragraph essay may or may not have exactly five paragraphs. The term refers to a form of short essay based around an introduction, approximately three supporting paragraphs, and a conclusion, for a total of five paragraphs.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post comparison-contrast-topic-selection appeared first on Custom Nursing Help.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post comparison-contrast-topic-selection first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.

B.  Turn  in  a  “Preliminary  Analysis”  of  your  topic  (approximately  ½  –

/in /by

B.  Turn  in  a  “Preliminary  Analysis”  of  your  topic  (approximately  ½  -1  page)  by  the  deadline  in  the  schedule.    Use  the format  parameters  as  described  above.    At  the  beginning  of  the  text,  put  the  topic  title  and  number  preceded  by  “My (either “Preliminary” or “Final” as appropriate) Analysis of the Ethical Issues in (article #, the case of…”C.  .  – Do your own research on the issue and on related topics to develop your paper. Your “Preliminary Analysis” paper will not be judged harshly.  Use your current instincts and current understanding of ethics.  – .  I have caught students plagiarizing.  Don’t even think about it. Do your own work.  If caught plagiarizing, you will get “0” points for the assignment, possibly flunk the course, and will be reported to the Dean and Registrar.  See the rules in the latter part of this syllabus. 
33: The Partiality of Friendship
Jim has the responsibility of filling a position in his firm. His friend Paul has applied and is qualified, but someone else seems even more qualified. Jim wants to give the job to Paul, but he feels guilty, believing that he ought to be impartial. That’s the essence of morality, he initially tells himself. This belief is, however, rejected, as Jim resolves that friendship has a moral importance that permits, and perhaps even requires, partiality in some circumstances. So he gives the job to Paul. Was he right?
Features of this question are discussed at the Generalized Structure. Otherwise, we should consider the moral dilemmas that arise when loyalty to friends, or to family, conflicts with other obligations. Thus, in the great Indian epic the Mahâbhârata, the figure Karna realizes that he is on the wrong side of the conflict and that he will be fighting the people who represent the right and the good. Krishna even offers Karna the leadership of the good side and the throne of the Kingdom in dispute. Karna, however, determines to remain loyal to the villain, Duryodhana, because Duryodhana was kind to him when everyone else was insulting and dismissive (because he did not appear to be a Kshatriya, although in fact he was). The offer of someone like Krishna looks motivated less by concern for Karna than for the people he will be fighting. Karna’s loyalty, although he knows it will lead to his own defeat and death, ends up seeming noble and admirable in its own right, but it also seems tragic, perverse, and pointless than so much carnage should result when Karna knows that his cause is wrong.
A similar, and perhaps stronger, issue arises when loyalty to family is involved. Thus, in the Analects, at XIII:18, Confucius says that in his country, “A father will screen his son, and a son his father,” after being told about a son who informed on his father for theft. We also find a similar standard assumed by Socrates in the Euthyphro, where Euthyphro thinks that it is pious to prosecute his father for murder. Socrates expresses astonishment, since this is a major breach of Greek piety, for a son to act against his father. The issue also turns up in the review of “The Impiety of Socrates,” where M.F. Burnyeat misses the nature of Euthryphro’s impiety in this. With both Confucius and Euthyphro, there is a conflict and a dilemma between filial piety,  , the duty to protect parents, and righteousness,  , the duty to see that justice is done.

The post B.  Turn  in  a  “Preliminary  Analysis”  of  your  topic  (approximately  ½  – appeared first on homework handlers.