In a brief paragraph (5-7 sentences), answer one of the following questions:

In a brief paragraph (5-7 sentences), answer one of the following questions:

What research (e.g., a specific discovery, a particular field) has had the most significant impact on your life and why?
What kind of research do you use most, and why?

3.2 Discussion: Negligence

Instructions
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
In your textbook Business Law and the Legal Environment, read section 7.1 Purpose of Tort Laws and section 7.3 Negligence from Chapter 7, Introduction to Tort Law”.
Listen to the National Public Radio presentation Its a Duel: Do Violent Video Games Affect Kids? You can also read the transcript on the web page.
Make note of at least two opposing viewpoints about how violent video games affect kids.
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:
Explain the elements of negligence and why the plaintiffs felt the defendants were negligent.
Why did the appeals court rule in favor of the defendants in this case?
In your opinion, do you believe the defendants owed a duty of care to the plaintiffs? Explain your viewpoint.
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
Your postings also should:
Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
Provide clarification to classmates questions and provide insight into the discussion.
Be posted on three different days during the workshop.

2.2 Discussion: Summary Judgment

Instructions
Review the rubric to make sure you understand the criteria for earning your grade.
Read What is Summary Judgment? and the case summary Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Navigate to the threaded discussion, and respond to the following:
In your own words, explain the summary judgment concept.
Summarize the relevant facts of Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Explain why you agree or disagree with the legal ruling in Marri v. New York City Transit Authority (2013).
Your initial post is due by the end of the fourth day of the workshop.
Read and respond to at least two of your classmates postings, as well as all follow-up instructor questions directed to you, by the end of the workshop.
Your postings also should:
Be well developed by providing clear answers with evidence of critical thinking.
Add greater depth to the discussion by introducing new ideas.
Provide clarification to classmates questions and insight into the discussion.
Be posted on three different days during the workshop.

Healthcare Management Systems

1. Describe how the use of an electronic health record can affect privacy and security in ways that differ from the use of the paper based records.

2. What are the pros and cons of using paper based records and electronic health records ?

3. Provide an example of a next-generation health care technology and how it can be used in a healthcare organization.