Research Misconduct: Real Cases

Search for a case of alleged or proven fabrication or falsification that has received media attention;
there are a number of famous cases (avoid selecting a plagiarism case now; we will discuss that topic later, and also avoid using the Han case from Iowa State; its been overused).
Learn as much as you can about the case you choose. Then prepare 2-3 paragraphs total that answer the following questions:

1. In the case you researched, what did the investigator do that was alleged to be or determined to be research misconduct? How was the case resolved? At what point do you think the investigator made the decision to commit research misconduct? Why do you think the investigator made the choices they did? What might have done to prevent it?

2. Imagine that a similar event occurred in your own laboratory.
a. How could you have detected the alleged misconduct?
b. What would you have done once you detected it?

3. Talk to your PI or lab mates. Have they encountered questionable research practices from anyone theyve worked with in the past? How did they handle it? What would they do if they did encounter such a situation? Provide a sentence or two summarizing your conversation.

draft an 11th amendment that you feel should be included with the original ten of the Bill of Rights

Using the information provided in this module, I want you all to briefly review and refresh your understanding of the Bill of Rights, comprising of the first ten amendments to the United States Constitution. While it’s easy to take a stance of “The actions of the (federal) government don’t really affect me”, the BoR absolutely impacts our lives on a daily basis, so much so that there is likely not a single document within the history of the United States that has comparable impact. A couple of key points that you should keep in mind.
The Bill of Rights (BoR) is one of the critical compromises that allowed our nation to form with all thirteen colonies as members. Members of the Anti-Federalist party (headed by James Madison and Thomas Jefferson to name a few) argued that a federal government would be too strong and could lead to tyrannical oversight. Therefore, the Federalist party agreed to allow the Anti-Federalists to pen ten amendments that would be ratified alongside the United States Constitution.
This was huge at the time. Though the idea of a limited government is commonplace today, at the time the greatest powers in the western (and eastern for the most part) world were hemmed by absolute monarchs or systems in which the ruling person or body was extremely powerful. The idea that a president for instance could simply be voted out and that rule would change hands often without violence was pretty radical.
All of the rights in the BoR are negative rights. You should recognize this term from your text at this point as well as understanding that these rights specifically state that the government cannot  act in a certain way. Keep this in mind because….
I want you, for the purposes of this discussion paper, to draft an 11th amendment that you feel should be included with the original ten of the BoR. This is a “research paper” (Gasp!) in the sense that you should devise a premise (I think that the 11th amendment should have mentioned that the government must not do ___ ), support your premise with rhetoric (logical argumentation that explains why your premise is valid) and external sources (research articles, statistics). The format of the essay should contain these elements:

A very very brief overview of the BoR. You could literally cite the document itself. Don’t waste a lot of time on this.
A proposed amendment
Support for the amendment (your own rationale, lived experiences and external sources)
Discuss how this will actually impact you/us and why you thought that, out of any possible amendment, this was the one to go for
Try not to overthink this one too much. A solid page and a half or two pages should be very sufficent to cover those points. Please use APA style throughout the paper (double spaced, 12pt font, TNR, in text and bibliographical citations in APA format). So long as you make a good faith effort and include all of the grading criteria you should have a solid grade to boost you up!

Grading Criteria:

Paper is logical, reasonable and is on topic.

The proposed amendment is both in line with the other amendments (negative right, focused on the government) and also reasonable in nature (as neat as ending world hunger would be, it’s probably beyond the scope of the United States Federal Government, for example).

Paper is formatted in APA style and contains both in-text citations and a bibliography.

Two external sources are used at minimum.

The page length is at least one and a half pages, double spaced in standard APA style.

M3: Topic Discussion

Consider how trauma would have caused the aggression and lack of empathy in Beth. Write your discussion post on your thoughts about Beth. Share how you believe trauma could cause Beth to be so “cold,” “empty,” and yet “angry” toward every living being (people and animals) around her.

video:
https://youtu.be/VDVaiwzU8yc

additional videos:
https://youtu.be/EPjo2uOArRc

Conceptualization

  • Assess the conceptualization, analysis, and synthesis of key research concepts presented.
  • Evaluate whether the presentation provides a cohesive summary of the assigned concepts with an effective evaluation of their implications for IT for competitive advantage research, as well as for business practices and social change initiatives.
  • Assess whether the presenter made a meaningful academic argument or interpretation that demonstrated fluency with the material.

Important Note: To ensure that all presentations receive peer review, please respond first to a presentation that has not yet received a review.

Be sure to support your work with a minimum of two specific citations from this week’s Learning Resources and one or more additional scholarly sources.

Akter, S., Wamba, S. F., Gunasekaran, A., Dubey, R., & Childe, S. J. (2016). How to improve firm performance using big data analytics capability and business strategy alignment? International Journal of Production Economics, 182, 113–131. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.018

Alamoudi, Y., & Alamoudi, W. (2016). Cloud computing – The future of business. Journal of Information Systems Technology and Planning, 8(19), 41–60. Retrieved from http://www.intellectbase.org/journals.php

Grosse, R. (2016). How emerging markets firms will become global leaders. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 11(3), 274–287. doi:10.1108/IJOEM-07-2015-0138

Liu, X., Vahtera, P., Wang, C., Wang, J., & Wei, Y. (2017). The delicate balance: Managing technology adoption and creation in multinational affiliates in an emerging economy. International Business Review, 26(3), 515–526. doi:10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.11.002

Neirotti, P., & Raguseo, E. (2017). On the contingent value of IT-based capabilities for the competitive advantage of SMEs: Mechanisms and empirical evidence. Information & Management, 54(2), 139–153. doi:10.1016/j.im.2016.05.004

Pongsuwan, P. (2016). How does procurement capability maturity affect e-procurement adoption and leverage purchasing in supply chain. International Journal of Business and Economic Development, 4(3), 45–54. Retrieved from http://ijbed.org/admin/content/pdf/i-12_c-124.pdf

Aro-Gordon, S. (2016). Leveraging information technology for effective performance appraisal in the Nigerian public service. Journal of Management, 7(2), 21–38. doi:10.15533/sdm/2016/v7i2/104322

Chevallier, C., Laarraf, Z., Lacam, J. S., Miloudi, A., & Salvetat, D. (2016). Competitive intelligence, knowledge management and coopetition: The case of European high-technology firms. Business Process Management Journal, 22(6), 1192–1211. doi:10.1108/BPMJ-11-2015-0161

Hernandez-Vivanco, A., Bernardo, M., & Cruz-Cázares, C. (2016). Relating open innovation, innovation and management systems integration. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 116(8), 1540–1556. doi:10.1108/IMDS-09-2015-0405

Li, M., & Nguyen, B. (2017). When will firms share information and collaborate to achieve innovation? A review of collaboration strategies. The Bottom Line, 30(1), 65–86. doi:10.1108/BL-12-2016-0039

Martinho, J. L., Gomes, C. F., & Yasin, M. M. (2016). The role of people and social context in promoting the IT organizational performance: Evidence from Portugal. Personnel Review, 45(5), 1087–1107. doi:10.1108/PR-02-2015-0034

The post Conceptualization appeared first on Brainy Term Papers.


Conceptualization was first posted on February 3, 2021 at 6:33 pm.
©2019 "Brainy Term Papers". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at support@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post Conceptualization first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.