Would you be able to do the flyer? (one page) and the one page summary? Drug Int

Would you be able to do the flyer? (one page) and the one page summary? Drug Interactions: Clonidine and Propranolol -Create an educational item that describes/displays the dangers associated with the chosen drugs. -This educational item can be in any format, so be creative. For example, you can create a pamphlet/brochure, a flyer, an infographic, a newsletter, etc. (at least one page) -Also include a one page summary as to why you chose the drugs and how you would use this educational item in practice. Make sure to cite your sources using APA formatting. You should include at least two scholarly sources.

The post Would you be able to do the flyer? (one page) and the one page summary? Drug Int appeared first on homework handlers.

The indications for mechanical ventilation are fairly well documented in the lit

The indications for mechanical ventilation are fairly well documented in the literature. However, the withdrawal process is less understood and more subjective. When should the discontinuation of mechanical ventilation be considered? What process should be followed? Should weaning parameters be used with every patient such as the RSBI? If so, which ones? Research these questions and provide one peer-reviewed article referencing what you would consider to be the “gold” standard in the weaning process. Provide a brief description of this methodology incorporating data from your reference study that substantiates your belief that this technique is optimal.

The post The indications for mechanical ventilation are fairly well documented in the lit appeared first on homework handlers.

Assignment 1: Task Force Committee Report: Issue and Solutions

Fully describes the organization by providing a relevant and robust but concise overview of the company (e.g. when they were established, what service(s) or products they provide, and other relevant information). Additionally, the author fully describes the issue he/she has identified; what he/she knows about it and how it has impacted the company.

Sufficiently describes the organization and provides details about the company. The issue is identified and the author sufficiently describes what he/she knows about it and its impact on the company.

Partially describes the organization and provides some details about the company, but additional details would improve the description. The issue and its impact on the company are not clearly articulated.

Does not describe the organization or provide details about the company. The issue and its impact on the company are not provided.

1. Describe the Organization and the Issue to Resolve
Weight: 20%

Completely describes the company’s culture by detailing how the company positions itself from internal and external perspectives. Draws strong, logical connections about how the culture did or could have supported/facilitated the challenge. Makes direct connections and supports points with source material.

Satisfactorily describes the company culture by drawing on and synthesizing corporate information about the company. Makes logical and realistic connections that are supported by source material.

Partially describes the company’s culture. Lacks details and/or multiple sources are not utilized to provide a well-rounded perspective. Makes loose connections that were not supported by sources or that were not fully articulated.

The culture is not described or the company is not differentiated completely from others. Poses unsupported connections or connections are not included.

2. Analyze Current Corporate Culture
Weight: 20%

Completely identifies areas of weakness and provides strong details with logical connections and supporting source material.

Satisfactorily identifies areas of weakness and provides valid details supported by source material.

Partially identifies areas of weakness and makes loose connections between the weaknesses and supporting material.

Does not identify areas of weakness or does not provide supporting source material.

3. Identify Areas of Weakness
Weight: 20%

Completely describes modifications to organizational practices and provides solutions with strong connections and supporting source material. Logically details how the solutions will resolve issue.

Satisfactorily describes modifications to organizational practices. Provides solutions that make some connections with supporting source material to indicate how the solutions will resolve the issue.

Partially describes modifications to organizational practices and solutions to resolve the issues. Lacks supporting details and source material.

Does not describe modifications to organizational practices, or does not identify solutions that would resolve the issue. No source material is provided.

4. Propose Solutions
Weight: 20%

Prepares an exemplary executive summary. The issue and problem are clearly stated. All of the main points are summarized.
Paragraphs are short and concise, providing the right amount of detail.
Language is ideal for the audience.

Satisfactorily prepares an executive summary. The issue and problem are stated and most of the main points are summarized.
Paragraphs could be more concise.
Language is appropriate for the audience.

Prepares a partial executive summary. The issue and problem are not clearly stated and the main points are not summarized.
Paragraphs are not short or concise. Language could be more appropriate for the audience.

Did not prepare a one-page executive summary.

5. Prepare an Executive Summary
Weight: 10%

Writing is excellent. Tone is professional and sophisticated. Shows logic, clarity, and consistent formatting. Contains no spelling, mechanical, or grammatical errors. Is free of formatting and citation errors.
Exceeds number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Writing could be improved, but meets acceptable standards. Tone is professional. Shows logic, clarity, and consistent formatting. May contain few or no spelling, mechanical, and/or grammatical errors. There may be minor formatting or citation errors.
Meets the number of required references; all references are high-quality choices.

Writing is satisfactory. Professional tone is developing. Shows moderate logic, clarity, and/or consistent formatting. May contain more than a few spelling, grammar, mechanical, formatting, or citation errors.
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references are of poor quality.

Writing does not meet minimum standards. Tone is not professional. Communication is wholly lacking in logic, clarity, and/or consistent formatting. Contains many spelling, mechanical, formatting, citation, and/or grammatical errors.
References are not provided.

6. Write Professionally Using Quality Resources
Weight: 10%

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post Assignment 1: Task Force Committee Report: Issue and Solutions first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.


week six final paper psy645

week six final paper psy645

Psychiatric Diagnosis

For this assignment, students will investigate and propose a psychiatric diagnosis based on the case study from the Gorenstein and Comer (2015) textbook Case Studies in Abnormal Psychology, chosen in the Week One “Initial Call” discussion. This paper will include an in-depth overview of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, treatment options for the diagnosis, and a sound rationale that explains why this diagnosis was made. Note that the diagnosis may include more than one psychiatric disorder.

The paper must present a thorough overview of each disorder within the diagnosis. Assume the audience has no prior knowledge of the disorder(s) within the diagnosis, and provide relevant and easy to understand explanations of each for the readers. When writing the paper, it is critical to convey all the necessary information in a straightforward manner using non-technical language. (Reference the Professional Voice and Writing (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. resource provided by the Ashford Writing Center for assistance.) Support the analysis with at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last ten years in addition to the course text.

The Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper must include the following:

  • Explain psychological concepts in the patient’s presentation using professional terminology. Identify symptoms and behaviors exhibited by the patient in the chosen case study.
  • Match the identified symptoms to potential disorders in a diagnostic manual.
  • Propose a diagnosis based on the patient’s symptoms and the criteria listed for the disorder(s) in the diagnostic manual.
  • Analyze and explain how the patient meets criteria for the disorder(s) according to the patient’s symptoms and the criteria outlined in the diagnostic manual.
  • Justify the use of the chosen diagnostic manual (i.e., Why was this manual chosen over others?).
  • Summarize general views of the diagnosis from multiple theoretical orientations and historical perspectives. Include a discussion on comorbidity if the diagnosis includes more than one disorder.
  • Evaluate symptoms within the context of an appropriate theoretical orientation for this diagnosis.
  • Use at least two peer-reviewed articles to assess the validity of this diagnosis, and describe who is most likely to have the diagnosis with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. Provide a brief evaluation of the scientific merit of these peer-reviewed sources in the validity assessment.
  • Summarize the risk factors (i.e., biological, psychological, and/or social) for the diagnosis. If one of the categories is not relevant, address this within the summary.
  • Compare evidence-based and non-evidence-based treatment options for the diagnosis.
  • Evaluate well-established treatments for the diagnosis, and describe the likelihood of success or possible outcomes for each treatment.
  • Create an annotated bibliography of five peer-reviewed references published within the last ten years to inform the diagnosis and treatment recommendations. In the annotated bibliography, write a two- to three-sentence evaluation of the scientific merit of each of these references. For additional assistance with this portion of the assignment, access the Ashford Writing Center’s Sample Annotated Bibliography (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..

Attention Students: The Masters of Arts in Psychology program is utilizing the Pathbrite portfolio tool as a repository for student scholarly work in the form of signature assignments completed within the program. After receiving feedback for this Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper, please implement any changes recommended by the instructor, go to Pathbrite and upload the revised Psychiatric Diagnosis topical paper to the portfolio. (Use the Pathbrite Quick-Start Guide to create an account if you do not already have one.) The upload of signature assignments will take place after completing each course. Be certain to upload revised signature assignments throughout the program as the portfolio and its contents will be used in other courses and may be used by individual students as a professional resource tool. See the Pathbrite (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. website for information and further instructions on using this portfolio tool.

The Psychiatric Diagnosis

  • Must be 8 to 15 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
  • Must include a separate title page with the following:
    • Title of paper
    • Student’s name
    • Course name and number
    • Instructor’s name
    • Date submitted
  • Must use at least five peer-reviewed sources published within the last 10 years in addition to the course text.
  • Must include a separate annotated bibliography page.
  • Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.
  • Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.

Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.

 

Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!

NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.

The post week six final paper psy645 appeared first on Quality Nursing Writers.

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

The post week six final paper psy645 first appeared on Nursing Essays Writers.