is there a cybersecurity workforce crisis IN state governments writing homework help
Prepare a three to five paragraph introduction (briefing statement) for a general election debate question:
As governor, how will your administration improve cybersecurity for the state’s Critical Infrastructures?
This question will be asked of all gubernatorial candidates participating in a state-level debate (you should not address any single candidate or party).
Your introduction must provide enough information that the candidates understand key terms as defined by you for the debate question:
What is meant by “cybersecurity” for critical infrastructures?”
Where have past state government administrations supported or fallen short in promoting cybersecurity for critical infrastructures?
What is meant by “Threats” (i.e. individual hackers, politically motivated hacktivists, criminal enterprises, and unfriendly “nation state” actors)
If you need help getting started, take a look at this report: http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/1011GOVGUIDEHS.PDF or, run this Google search: https://www.google.com/search?q=governors+critical+infrastructure
Provide in-text citations and references for 3 or more authoritative sources. Put the reference list at the end of your posting.
Timeliness of Initial Posting
On Time
Late
Very Late
No Submission
Timeliness of Briefing Statement or Paper
12 points
Posted briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Friday.
10 points
Posted briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Saturday.
5 points
Posted briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
0 points
Did not post a briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
Briefing Statement or Paper
Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or No Work Submitted
Introduction to Briefing Statement or Paper
10 points
Provided an excellent introduction to the deliverable which clearly, concisely, and accurately addressed the topic of the briefing statement or paper. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
8.5 points
Provided an outstanding introduction to the deliverable which clearly and accurately addressed the topic of the briefing statement or paper. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
7 points
Provided an acceptable introduction to the deliverable which addressed the topic of the briefing statement or paper. Appropriately paraphrased information from authoritative sources.
6 points
Provided an introduction to the deliverable but the section lacked some required details. Information from authoritative sources was mentioned.
4 points
Attempted to provide an introduction to the deliverable but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources (too many quotations or improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Introduction was missing or no work submitted.
Analysis
15 points
Provided an excellent analysis of the issues for the required briefing topic. Addressed at least three separate issues and provided appropriate examples for each. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
13.5 points
Provided an outstanding analysis of the issues for the required briefing topic. Addressed at least two separate issues and provided appropriate examples for each. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
12 points
Provided an acceptable analysis of the issues for the required briefing topic. Addressed at least one specific issue and provided an appropriate example. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
11 points
Addressed the required briefing topic but the analysis lacked details or was somewhat disorganized. Appropriately used and cited information from authoritative sources.
8 points
Mentioned the required briefing topic but the analysis was very disorganized or off topic. OR, the analysis did not appropriately use information from authoritative sources (too many quotations or improper paraphrasing).
0 points
Analysis was missing or no work was submitted.
Summary
10 points
Included an excellent summary section for the briefing statement or paper which was on topic, well organized, and covered at least 3 key points. The summary contained at least one full paragraph.
8.5 points
Included an outstanding summary paragraph for the briefing statement or paper which was on topic and covered at least 3 key points.
7 points
Included a summary paragraph for the briefing statement or paper which was on topic and provided an appropriate closing.
6 points
Included a summary paragraph but, this section lacked content or was disorganized.
4 points
Included a few summary sentences for the briefing statement or paper.
0 points
Did not include a summary for the briefing statement or paper.
Use of Authoritative Sources
5 points
Included and properly cited three or more authoritative sources (no errors).
4 points
Included and properly cited three or more authoritative sources (minor errors allowable).
3 points
Included and cited two or more authoritative sources (minor errors allowable). Reference list entries contain sufficient information to enable the reader to find and retrieve the cited sources.
2 points
Included and cited at least one authoritative source (errors allowable in citations or reference entries). Reference list entries contain sufficient information to enable the reader to find and retrieve the cited sources.
1 point
Mentioned at least one authoritative source but, the citations and/or reference list entries lacked required information (not sufficient to retrieve the correct resource).
0 points
References and citations were missing. Or, no work submitted.
Professionalism
10 points
No formatting, grammar, spelling, or punctuation errors. Submitted work shows outstanding organization and the use of color, fonts, titles, headings and sub-headings, etc. is appropriate to the assignment type.
8.5 points
Work contains minor errors in formatting, grammar, spelling or punctuation which do not significantly impact professional appearance. Work needs some polishing to improve professional appearance.
7 points
Errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation which need attention / editing to improve professional appearance of the work.
6 points
Submitted work has numerous errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, or punctuation. Substantial polishing / editing is required.
4 points
Submitted work is difficult to read and/or understand. OR, work has significant errors in formatting, spelling, grammar, punctuation, or word usage which detract from the overall professional appearance of the work.
0 points
No submission.
Timeliness of Postings
On Time
Late
Very Late
First Critique for Another Student
2 points
Posted a critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 pm ET on Saturday.
1 point
Posted a critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Did not post a critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
Second Critique for Another Student
2 points
Posted a second critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 pm ET on Saturday.
1 point
Posted a second critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Did not post a second critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper before 11:59 PM ET on Sunday.
Follow-Up Reply or Discussion Participation
2 points
Posted a follow-up reply or discussion posting before 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Posted a follow-up reply or discussion posting after 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Did not post a follow-up reply in the week’s topic.
Second Follow-Up Reply or Discussion Posting
2 points
Posted a second follow-up reply or discussion posting before 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Posted a second follow-up reply or discussion posting after 11:59 pm ET on Sunday.
0 points
Did not post a second follow-up reply in the week’s topic.
Quality of Discussion Postings
Excellent
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Low-Quality or No Work Submitted
Critique #1 for Another Student’s Briefing Statement or Paper
10 points
Posted an excellent critique for another student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique focused on ways in which the content could be improved and/or better organized. Provided 3 or more specific examples and added value to the discussion.
8.5 points
Posted an acceptable critique for another student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique focused on ways in which the content could be improved and/or better organized. Provided at least one specific example and added value to the discussion.
7 points
Posted a critique of another student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique provided at least one suggestion for improvement.
0 points
Posting was missing or did not add contain a critique of the briefing statement or paper.
Critique #2 for Another Student’s Briefing Statement or Paper
10 points
Posted an excellent critique for another student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique focused on ways in which the content could be improved and/or better organized. Provided 3 or more specific examples and added value to the discussion.
8.5 points
Posted an acceptable critique for another student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique focused on ways in which the content could be improved and/or better organized. Provided at least one specific example and added value to the discussion.
7 points
Posted a critique of a second student’s briefing statement or paper. Critique provided at least one suggestion for improvement.
0 points
Posting was missing or did not add contain a critique of the briefing statement or paper.
Follow-up Reply or Comment #1
5 points
Posted a follow-up reply or comment which added value to the discussion.
4 points
Posted an acceptable follow-up reply or comment which added some value to the discussion.
3 points
Posted a follow-up reply or comment but added little value to the discussion.
0 points
Posting was missing or did not add value to the discussion.
Follow-up Reply or Comment #2
5 points
Posted a follow-up reply or comment which added value to the discussion.
4 points
Posted an acceptable follow-up reply or comment which added some value to the discussion.
3 points
Posted a follow-up reply or comment but added little value to the discussion.
0 points
Posting was missing or did not add value to the discussion.
Overall Score
Excellent100 or more
Outstanding85 or more
Acceptable75 or more
Needs Improvement65 or more
Needs Significant Improvement1 or more
No Work Submitted0 or more
Case Study #3: Is there a cybersecurity workforce crisis in state governments??
Case Scenario:
A membership organization for state government officials has asked your cybersecurity consulting firm to partner with it in developing a one-day workshop on workforce development needs for cybersecurity workers. Your part in this endeavor is to provide the coordinating committee with a position paper which discusses the question: “Is there a cybersecurity workforce crisis in state governments? Your paper should be no more than 3 pages in length and must address both sides of the question (“yes, there is a crisis†and “no, there is not a crisisâ€).
Research:
1.Read / Review the Week 5 readings.
2.Research authoritative sources which support the “Yes†side of the question. Here are several sources to help you get started:
a.http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2015/5/11/hiring-cybersecurity-staff-is-hard-for-states
b.http://www.nga.org/files/live/sites/NGA/files/pdf/2014/1410TheCybersecurityWorkforce.pdf
c. Comparing Private Sector and Government Worker Salaries http://reason.org/news/show/public-sector-private-sector-salary (This source argues both sides of the compensation / education arguments.)
3.Research authoritative sources which support the “No†side of the question. For example, states may have a shortage of workers overall. Or, the lack of competitive compensation claim may be inaccurate. Or, you may find that the shortage of cybersecurity workers is unrelated to the type of employer (that is, everyone is having problems finding qualified personnel).
a.Budgetary Constraints (p. 3, Figure 1.4) http://www.csg.org/knowledgecenter/docs/ta0210workshortage.pdf
b.IT Workforce hiring issues: http://www.nascio.org/Portals/0/Publications/Documents/NASCIO_ITWorkforce_UnderPressure.pdf
c.State vs Private Compensation (see “Conclusions†on p. 15) https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/-biggs-overpaid-or-underpaid-a-statebystate-ranking-of-public-employee-compensation_112536583046.pdf
d.Global talent gap http://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/technology/239113-cybersecurity-talent-worse-than-a-skills-shortage-its-a
4.Review the best practice recommendations from the NICE report. Select three to five best practices which state governments could benefit from implementing. http://niccs.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/documents/files/Best%20Practices%20for%20Planning%20a%20Cybersecurity%20Workforce_062813_v4.2_FINAL_NICE%20branded_0.pdf
5.Review alternative recommendations for attracting and retaining qualified talent (workers) to a state or region. Select 3 or more which you believe would be beneficial for state government hiring efforts for cybersecurity personnel.
a.About Good Neighbor Next Door (ask yourself if this program or something similar should be extended to cybersecurity personnel) http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/program_offices/housing/sfh/reo/goodn/gnndabot
b.Attracting Big Talent to Small Cities http://www.hreonline.com/HRE/view/story.jhtml?id=534358095
c.7 Ways to Attract and Retain Talent (without having to compete on salaries) http://www.oyginc.com/articles/attractarticle1/
d.Government Needs to Rethink How They Attract IT Talent http://www.governing.com/columns/tech-talk/gov-remaking-your-workforce.html
Write:
Write a two to three page summary of your research. At a minimum, your summary must include the following:
1.An introduction or overview of the cybersecurity workforce issues which impact State governments. This overview should address the political, economic, socio-cultural (included education), and technological factors which contribute to the perceived lack of qualified cybersecurity workers. This introduction should be suitable for an executive audience.
2.A separate section which addresses three to five specific reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified cybersecurity workers for positions in state agencies and offices.
3.A separate section which addresses three to five specific “non-cybersecurity†reasons why a workforce shortage affecting state governments may currently exist. You may also choose to argue that the workforce shortage arises out of state budget problems rather than training and education or salary.
4.A recommendations section which addresses three to five marketing or hiring actions which state governments could take to attract cybersecurity talent and reduce or alleviate a cybersecurity workforce shortage for trained and qualified cybersecurity personnel. These recommendations should include several alternative practices which deemphasize salary.
Your white paper should use standard terms and definitions for cybersecurity and privacy. The following sources are recommended:
•ISACA Glossary http://www.isaca.org/pages/glossary.aspx
•Guidelines on Security and Privacy in Public Cloud Computing http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-144.pdf
Submit For Grading
Submit your case study in MS Word format (.docx or .doc file) using the Case Study #1 Assignment in your assignment folder. (Attach the file.)
Formatting Instructions
Use standard APA formatting for the MS Word document that you submit to your assignment folder. Formatting requirements and examples are found under Course Resources > APA Resources.
Additional Information
1.You are expected to write grammatically correct English in every assignment that you submit for grading. Do not turn in any work without (a) using spell check, (b) using grammar check, (c) verifying that your punctuation is correct and (d) reviewing your work for correct word usage and correctly structured sentences and paragraphs. These items are graded under Professionalism and constitute 20% of the assignment grade.
2.You are expected to credit your sources using in-text citations and reference list entries. Both your citations and your reference list entries must comply with APA 6th edition Style requirements. Failure to credit your sources will result in penalties as provided for under the university’s Academic Integrity policy.
Rubric Name: Case Study #3 Rubric
Criteria
Excellent
Outstanding
Acceptable
Needs Improvement
Needs Significant Improvement
Missing or Unacceptable
Introduction or Overview for the Case Study
20 points
Provided an excellent introduction or overview of the cybersecurity workforce issues which impact State governments. This overview addressed 5 or more specific political, economic, socio-cultural (included education), and technological factors which contribute to the perceived lack of qualified cybersecurity workers. The overview appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.
18 points
Provided an outstanding introduction or overview of the cybersecurity workforce issues which impact State governments. This overview addressed 4 or more specific political, economic, socio-cultural (included education), and technological factors which contribute to the perceived lack of qualified cybersecurity workers. The overview appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.
16 points
Provided an introduction or overview of the cybersecurity workforce issues which impact State governments. This overview addressed 3 or more specific political, economic, socio-cultural (included education), and technological factors which contribute to the perceived lack of qualified cybersecurity workers. The overview appropriately used information from 1 or more authoritative sources.
14 points
Provided an overview but the section lacked important details about the case. Information from authoritative sources was cited and used in the overview.
10 points
Attempted to provide an introduction to the case study but this section lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.
0 points
The introduction and/or overview sections of the paper were off topic.
Reasons Behind Cybersecurity Workforce Shortages in State Government
15 points
Provided an excellent discussion of the reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified cybersecurity workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Provided 3 or more specific examples specific to the cybersecurity workforce. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.
8.5 points
Provided an outstanding discussion of the reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified cybersecurity workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Provided 3 or more specific examples specific to the cybersecurity workforce. Appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.
7 points
Discussed two or more reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified cybersecurity workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Appropriately used information from 1 or more authoritative sources.
6 points
Discussed at least one reason why states have difficulty hiring enough personnel for their cybersecurity positions in state agencies and offices. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.
4 points
Attempted to provide information about state hiring difficulties for cybersecurity personnel but the discussion lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.
0 points
This section was missing, off topic, or failed to provide information about hiring in state governments for cybersecurity personnel.
Non-Cybersecurity Reasons Why States Have Difficulty Hiring Trained & Qualified Workers
15 points
Provided an excellent discussion of the “non-cybersecurity” reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Provided 5 or more general examples which were not specific to the cybersecurity workforce. Appropriately used information from 3 or more authoritative sources.
8.5 points
Provided an excellent discussion of the “non-cybersecurity” reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Provided 4 or more general examples which were not specific to the cybersecurity workforce. Appropriately used information from 2 or more authoritative sources.
7 points
Provided a discussion of the “non-cybersecurity” reasons why states have difficulty hiring a sufficient number of trained and qualified workers for positions in state agencies and offices. Provided at least one general example which was not specific to the cybersecurity workforce. Appropriately used information from 1 or more authoritative sources.
6 points
Discussed at least one non-cybersecurity reason why states have difficulty hiring enough personnel for their cybersecurity positions in state agencies and offices. Appropriately used information from authoritative sources.
4 points
Attempted to provide information about non cybersecurity reasons behind state hiring difficulties for cybersecurity personnel but the discussion lacked detail and/or was not well supported by information drawn from authoritative sources.
0 points
This section was missing, off topic, or failed to provide information about hiring in state governments for cybersecurity personnel.
Recommendations for Alternative Hiring Practices to Attract and Retain Cybersecurity Personnel
20 points
Provided an excellent discussion which addressed at least five marketing or hiring actions which state governments could take to attract cybersecurity talent and reduce or alleviate a cybersecurity workforce shortage for trained and qualifie
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!Use Discount Code “Newclient” for a 15% Discount!NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
https://nursingwritershub.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/155981288087276411-4-300×55.png
0
0
admin
https://nursingwritershub.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/155981288087276411-4-300×55.png
admin2021-02-28 21:06:222021-02-28 21:06:22is there a cybersecurity workforce crisis IN state governments writing homework help
© Copyright 2020 Nursing Writers Hub
Aggression
Scroll to top
“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”
