Data Collection and Software

/in /by

After completing the required reading assignments. Provide a critical analysis discussion using your own professional work experience and learning from the reading. At the post graduate level you are not to provide a summary but rather provide a critical thinking assessment of the topic. You must use at least one Biblical citation, one peer-reviewed journal article citation, and one course primary topic textbook citation to inform you further on the topic.

Your initial thread is due on Wednesday of the module week and must be 500750 words with in-text citation and references. Be sure you copy and paste your text into the DB. You may attach a documents after posting text to the DB.

The following 3 sources must be included in your thread:

The course primary topic textbook
At least 1 peer-reviewed journal article
1 passage of Scripture
You must cite all sources you used in current APA format.

Textbook Readings
Ahmed (2019): Sections 12.1-12.4

Bartlett (2013): Chapter 10: Data Collection.

Bartlett (2013) Chapter 11: Data Software.

Merida (2015): Elisha: Mighty in word and deed, pp. 428-463.

bitcoin

/in /by

In 750 words explain how Bitcoin works and emphasise one element you find especially interesting. You can be positive or negative about Bitcoin.

(By short report I just mean an overview in a Word document.  Don’t overthink the report part of it)

Minimum two academic references required
Times New Roman size
1.5 spacing
Must be Harvard Referencing

Phl Unit 7

/in /by

Read Chapters I and II, of Kant’s major foundational work in ethics, Groundwork to a Metaphysics of Morals. (You can skip ch. 3 if pressed for time.)

We have devoted quite a bit to Kant now, so you should be able to analyze and evaluate this core theory:

In your short essay, assess Kant’s ethical theory. What works / does not work? What is attractive or useful (or not)?  Support your analysis, discussion, and evaluation with quotes from Kant’s texts. (As usual, cite from the section in Kant, if you cannot refer to actual page numbers.) Be fair and accurate in your summary (avoid the “Straw Man” fallacy) before you proceed to evaluate it.  Feel free to use examples (real or imagined). You can also bring in Sandel as a supplement if you wish.

As usual, also post a least one peer response.

These “THINK PIECES” should be your response to the course material as you are w

/in /by

These “THINK PIECES” should be your response to the course material as you are working through it. By “course material” I mean the assigned reading PLUS all narrated PowerPoints, Kaltura videos, any short essays of my own which I post during the week, etc. This material is organized by “Sections” in the Course Calendar (see below). By “think piece” I mean your reaction(s) to the material that you read, view, and hear: your questions, your comments, your disagreements, your queries, etc. In other words: I want to be able to judge what you derived from each of the seven Sections of the assigned materials. (In the version of this course I taught last summer one student’s think pieces were short summaries of each and every particular item in the assigned material for a given Section. That is certainly ONE way to do them, but it is NOT what I have in mind in imagining how you might approach this assignment.) These “think pieces” should be double-spaced, @2 pages in length (NO MORE). They are meant to be VERY INFORMAL: for example, your thoughts as you are working through the week’s material would be perfectly appropriate; or a reading diary you keep; or any other way you feel comfortable with putting your ideas together on each Section of the course material.
https://we.tl/t-YNOAAeWBU3 files

The post These “THINK PIECES” should be your response to the course material as you are w appeared first on homework handlers.