Create a 3–4-page executive summary of tools and best practices for quality impr

Create a 3–4-page executive summary of tools and best practices for quality improvement, risk management, and learning guidelines. Include a summary table that describes the status of an organization’s compliance with regulatory requirements. Scenario Assume you have taken on a new role as the chief operating officer. You are charged with leading system-wide risk-management efforts to identify risk and minimize HACs. Your organization’s financial viability depends on receiving proper reimbursement for services delivered. As the chief operating officer, you must create an executive summary that describes your organization’s compliance with the regulatory requirement, to promptly identify conditions that are POAs and proactively assess and manage risk. Instructions Step One: Executive Summary Table Select a risk-management issue within a specific health care setting or organization. You will use this issue as a starting point for your work on this assessment. Use the Executive Summary Table from the Required Resources to complete this step. Issue: Write a brief description of the risk-management issue you selected. Explain why this risk-management issue is important to your organization.
Regulatory Requirements: Compile a list of the applicable regulatory requirements and an explanation of what they mean to your chosen risk-management issue.
Risk-Management Implications: Identify the associated risk-management implications. For example, HACs result in no reimbursement, and poor quality ratings. Also, there is a risk of losing repeat admissions, a risk of losing Joint Commission and Magnet accreditation or excellence, or other negative implications.
Environmental Assessment: Assess the internal versus external environment relative to the risks associated with your chosen risk-management issue. You may use strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis or another suitable tool. Be sure to cite the source.
Resources to Address Issue: Describe any resources or strengths your organization possesses that could aid in addressing the risk-management issue.
Philosophy or Culture Statement: Summarize your organization’s philosophy or culture as it relates to patient safety and error reporting.
Measuring and Monitoring:
Identify metrics for measuring or monitoring the risk-management issue.
Propose how you will make use of the outcome data for organizational improvement.
Organizational Improvement: State how you will encourage voluntary reporting.
Ethics Considerations: Describe legal and ethical implications related to the handling of this risk-management issue.
Utilize established sources of information. Some sources that may be useful to you include the federal register, statutes, discipline-specific peer-reviewed journals, and government agency references. Step Two: Executive Summary Using the information assembled in Step One, prepare a 3–4-page executive summary for a written presentation to the management team. Select a format for your summary based on your chosen organization’s standards for executive summaries. (Examples of these types of documents can also be found using an Internet search.) Include the following: A proactive assessment of your organization’s compliance with the regulatory requirement to promptly identify POAs and proactively assess and manage risk based on existing regulations and requirements.
Your identification of tools and best practices for monitoring parameters and reducing risk, including organizational structure needed for risk reeducation, as supported by the literature.
Your recommendations for quality improvement and organization-specific risk management and learning guidelines.
You must include the completed table from Step One as an appendix to this executive summary. Additional Requirements Written communication: Written communication should be free from errors that detract from the overall message. (You must include the Executive Summary Table as an appendix to your report.)
Length of paper: 3–4 double-spaced pages for the written portion of the assessment.
Number of resources: A minimum of three resources.
APA Format: Use appropriate APA format for clear, concise presentation of information. Communicate information and ideas accurately, utilizing peer-reviewed sources, including proper APA reference citations.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Requirements: .doc file

The post Create a 3–4-page executive summary of tools and best practices for quality impr appeared first on homework handlers.

Ch. 7 addresses the Issues surrounding sexuality. Specifically sexual orientatio

Ch. 7 addresses the Issues surrounding sexuality. Specifically sexual orientation. Prostitution, pornography, teen pregnancy to name a few. As you read through the chapter. focus on Me). what, how theorist In socio/ofty would attempt to analyze and explain them through their respected perspectives. Remember. you do not have to agree with the theoretical approaches but you do need to understand and apply them respectfully. 1 page in APA english U.S no grammar errors Requirements: .doc file

The post Ch. 7 addresses the Issues surrounding sexuality. Specifically sexual orientatio appeared first on homework handlers.

I’m working on a writing discussion question and need support to help me study.N

I’m working on a writing discussion question and need support to help me study.NOT EVIDENTA description of the environment before and during the bioreaction(s) is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description is missing details or includes unclear details about the environment before and during the bioreaction(s).COMPETENTThe description of the environment includes specific, contextual, and sensory details about the environment before and during the bioreaction(s).A2. STIMULUS:NOT EVIDENTA description of the stimulus or threat that triggered the bioreaction(s) is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description is missing details or includes unclear details about the stimulus or threat that triggered the bioreaction(s).COMPETENTThe description contains relevant and specific details about the stimulus or threat that triggered the bioreaction(s).A3. DESCRIPTION OF BIOREACTION(S):NOT EVIDENTA description of the bioreactions(s) experienced is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description reflects limited awareness of specific bioreaction(s) and includes minimal details of the candidate’s personal experience.COMPETENTThe description reflects awareness of specific bioreaction(s) and includes specific details of the candidate’s personal experience.A4. PHYSICAL RESPONSE:NOT EVIDENTA description of the physical sensations experienced during the bioreaction(s) is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description demonstrates a lack of awareness of the specific physical sensations that occurred when the candidate became aware of the bioreaction(s).COMPETENTThe description demonstrates awareness of specific physical sensations that occurred when the candidate became aware of the bioreaction(s).A5. FEELING(S):NOT EVIDENTA description of the feeling(s) experienced in the social situation is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description is missing details or includes unclear details of the feeling(s) experienced in the social situation before, during, and after the bioreaction(s).COMPETENTThe description includes specific, reflective details of the feeling(s) experienced in the social situation before, during, and after the bioreaction(s).A6. WHAT COULD BE DONE DIFFERENTLY:NOT EVIDENTA description of what could be done differently to successfully navigate the reaction is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe description is not practical or does not appropriately address what the candidate would do differently, or the response is not feasible to successfully navigate the reaction in a similar social situation.COMPETENTThe description is practical and appropriately addresses what the candidate would do differently to successfully navigate the reaction in a similar social situation.A6A. REFLECTION:NOT EVIDENTA reflection on the importance of reacting differently during the bioreaction is not provided.APPROACHING COMPETENCEThe reflection includes unclear insights or does not demonstrate understanding of the importance of modifying the candidate’s response when experiencing the identified bioreaction.COMPETENTThe reflection includes personal insights and demonstrates understanding of the importance of modifying the candidate’s response when experiencing the identified bioreaction.B. PROFESSIONAL COMMUNICATION:NOT EVIDENTContent is unstructured, is disjointed, or contains pervasive errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar. Vocabulary or tone is unprofessional or distracts from the topic.APPROACHING COMPETENCEContent is poorly organized, is difficult to follow, or contains errors in mechanics, usage, or grammar that cause confusion. Terminology is misused or ineffective.COMPETENTContent reflects attention to detail, is organized, and focuses on the main ideas as prescribed in the task or chosen by the candidate. Terminology is pertinent, is used correctly, and effectively conveys the intended meaning. Mechanics, usage, and grammar promote accurate interpretation and understanding.
Requirements: .doc file

The post I’m working on a writing discussion question and need support to help me study.N appeared first on homework handlers.

Part 1: What is your (4 letter) personality type? What is your identified Lear

Part 1: What is your (4 letter) personality type? What is your identified Learning Style? Assimilator? Visionary? Other? (No other information is needed for this part of the assignment. ) ESFJ Contrubutors Part 2: Read pages 192-194 Student Learning: A Field Experiment in the Classroom AND pages 206-212 Environmentalism Among College Students: Read each study and summarize (in paragraph format), in detail, all aspects of how each study was conducted including the purpose, the methods, and the results, etc. Do not use direct quotes including exact percentages, etc. Part 3: Create a Statement of Purpose for your proposed experimental or survey design study that will be completed in Assignment 3 and 4. For class purposes, you will use the topic of Satisfaction (employee or customer.) See examples below: (Include the purpose, the group to be involved in the study, the exact location, and the data collection tool. Note all of these parts are mentioned in the samples.) Follow one of the examples exactly, substituting your own information. Experiment: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of a flex-time job option on the satisfaction level of the employees at Miller Manufacturing. Data will be collected through pre and post satisfaction questionnaire. OR Survey Design: The purpose of this study is to determine the satisfaction level of the employees working the night shift at Memorial Hospital. A questionnaire will be used to collect data. Part 4: actual Peer-Reviewed study from 2010-Present (Survey Design or Experimental Design) on the same topic of Satisfaction (employee or customer) as your Statement of Purpose. Summarize, in detail, all aspects of the study. Discuss only the study that was conducted by your author….do not include information from their literature review or any direct quotes. Include all APA documentation. This includes in-text citations in each paragraph and the correct APA Reference. Requirements: .doc file

The post Part 1: What is your (4 letter) personality type? What is your identified Lear appeared first on homework handlers.