summary of what i posted now

Title: Analyzing web searches can help experts predict, respond to COVID-19 hot spots.
Author: The study was conducted in collaboration with the Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery
Source: https://medicalxpress.com/news/2020-10-web-experts-covid-hot.html 
Web-based analytics have demonstrated their value in predicting the spread of infectious disease according to the new study from Mayo Clinic indicates the value of analyzing Google web searches for keywords related to COVID-19.
There were strong correlations were found between keyword searches on the internet search engine Google Trends and COVID-19 outbreaks in parts of the U.S. These correlations were observed up to 16 days prior to the first reported cases in some states
The Studies demonstrate that there is information present in Google Trends that precedes outbreaks, and with predictive analysis, this data can be used for better allocating resources with regards to testing, personal protective equipment, medications.
The study searched for 10 keywords that were chosen based on how commonly they were used and emerging patterns on the internet.
The keywords were:
COVID symptoms
Coronavirus symptoms
Sore throat+shortness of breath+fatigue+cough
Coronavirus testing center
Loss of smell
Lysol
Antibody
Face mask
Coronavirus vaccine
COVID stimulus check
Most of the keywords had moderate to strong correlations days before the first COVID-19 cases were reported in specific areas, with diminishing correlations following the first case.
The use of web search surveillance data is important as an adjunct for data science teams who are attempting to predict outbreaks and new hot spots in a pandemic. “Any delay in information could lead to missed opportunities to improve preparedness for an outbreak in a certain location.

Assignment 2: Legal Analysis Memorandum

Instructions
Assignment 2: Legal Analysis Memorandum

For this assignment, you will submit a three-page memorandum evaluating whether Brown violated Maryland law and identifying the specific criminal law code sections.

You must use the fact pattern provided below, the Annotated Code of Maryland, Criminal Law (see the below link to this source), and your class materials for this assignment.  All sources must be properly cited.

Structure the body of your memorandum using the IRAC method provided below:

I. Facts: Summarize the material facts as set forth in the below fact pattern.

II. Issue:  The issue is a statement of the question to be addressed in the memorandum.  Specifically, you must discuss whether Brown violated Maryland law and identify the specific criminal law code sections.

III. Rule: Cite to the applicable sections of the Criminal Law code that apply to the fact pattern.  You may also cite to your class materials and any secondary sources to identify and explain the legal standards and rules applicable to determining whether Brown violated Maryland law.

IV. Analysis: Clearly and thoroughly explain the relevant law, as it relates to the specific facts in the fact pattern provided below.

V. Conclusion: State your conclusion as to whether Brown violated Maryland law and the specific criminal law code sections.

Format Requirements

Paper must be double spaced, 11 or 12 pt font and 1margins all around.
All APA 7th edition format requirements must be followed (cover page, in text citations, reference page). Refer to APA/UMGC – learning resources found in the content page of this course.
You must have resources to support your thoughts/opinions/information.  These must be cited both in text as well as at the end of the document. Your paper should not contain direct quotes, sourced material must be paraphrased.

Link to the Annotated Code of Maryland, Criminal Law:

https://govt.westlaw.com/mdc/Browse/Home/Maryland/MarylandCodeCourtRules?guid=N958DC5209B6511DB9BCF9DAC28345A2A&originationContext=documenttoc&transitionType=Default&contextData=(sc.Default)&bhcp=1

Fact Pattern

The facts are as follows: Julio Manga and his wife are the co-owners of a residence at 123 10th St. Annapolis, MD. Jonathan Brown was at the Manga’s house on Sunday, February 10, 2018, watching the Super Bowl.  A concerned citizen contacted 911 and reported that the occupants of the home were selling drugs out of the home and were presently smoking marijuana and that one individual identified as Brown had a handgun in his waistband as he entered the residence. Based on the 911 call, Officers responded to the residence.

The Mangas’ home has a very large living room window and while walking up to the front door, officers observed through the window Mr. Brown and two other guests sitting on the couch watching television and smoking something.  They also detected a distinct odor coming from the residence and observed Mr. Brown hand a very large baggie of greenish-brown matter next to someone standing near the couch.  Based on the officers training, knowledge and experience, the particular smoking device being used and the distinct odor they detected, the officers reasonably believed the substance the occupants were smoking and contained within the large baggie was marijuana. 

Officers then knocked on the door. After hiding the drugs, Mr. Manga opened the door and granted the officers access to the home and consent to search.  When the officers came inside, they informed Mr. Brown and his friends that they had witnessed the transfer of a baggie of marijuana between Mr. Brown and another gentleman and that everyone in the room had been observed smoking marijuana through the living room window. Police then observed what looked like a handgun sandwiched between the cushions of the couch near Mr. Brown and upon further inspection discovered three additional handguns underneath the same couch.  The officers then conducted pat-downs of Mr. Brown and everyone else in the room. On Mr. Browns person, the officers recovered two digital scales and $1,541 in cash. On the person to whom Mr. Brown had handed the large baggie of greenish-brown matter, officers recovered a large baggie of marijuana.  None of the guns are properly registered and none of the occupants have valid permits to carry any firearms.

Discuss the potential charges that can be filed against Brown.

Keys to Effective Collaboration

Group A:

1.    Gail is the meeting organizer and the group lead on the project. She is very detail oriented as well as focused and communicates ideas clearly and checks for the groups understanding.

2.    Larry is the least attentive of the group during group discussion, and less vocal. He is primarily focused on just getting the project completed.

3.    Robert is very opinionated and frequently pushes back against others suggestions. He tends to take over conversations and points his finger repeatedly at the group when making a point.

4.    Melissa is quiet, shy, and has amazing ideas but looks uncomfortable in a group setting and rarely shares these ideas.

Using what you know about who the people are in group A, Write a 825 -word summary of recommendations to your manager who would like to know your thoughts on the following:
    Identify the potential challenges around collaboration group A might experience.
    Describe collaborative skills you would use to create a more positive atmosphere.
    Explain what would comprise effective communication for group A.
    Cite all references using APA format.

Development of a Wellness Education Program for Diabetes

This is a Capstone Project for a Master’s level program. It must be written as a scholarly paper worthy of submitting as published research. There must be an abstract included as part of the paper.

The body of the paper, not including the title, abstract, or references must be a minimum of 16 pages.

Must have a minimum of 5 scholarly peer-reviewed journal articles as references from within the last 5 years.

The paper must be written at a Master’s level in APA 7th edition format and will be checked by Grammarly and Turnitin for plagiarism.

Rubric and requirements will be uploaded for guidance.