Sustainability fashion

/in /by

Write and submit a 850 word response to the reading. You will be evaluated on your ability to evidence your overall understanding of the subject through referencing the readings as well as responding to its validity within your personal experience (you can make this up in regards to anything about jakarta, indonesia, where I am from). Offering a critical analysis along with strategic next steps are recommended to conclude your responses.

Things to address:
What do I disagree with as written, what’s my dissenting opinion, and why?
What does the reading leave unanswered, and how do I see answers to those questions?What new questions do I uncover in reading these works, and why are they so hard/complex to answer easily?

Discussion on Required Material for Week 2-Do this required discussion first

/in /by

Can this just be re write your in different words please and in the subject line, place a creative, enticing title, the question number, and the answer.

Good evening peers,
For this week’s forum I will be elaborating on question number 2, Legislation “is powerless to eradicate racial instincts or to abolish distinctions based upon physical differences, and the attempt to do so can only result in accentuating the difficulties of the present situation.”
‘Separate but equal,’ is not within the constitution, but the statement found its place in the Plessy vs. Ferguson case. The court’s decision to grant legal segregation guided by the grounds that facilities meant for the colored community were not inferior to the white community (Valdez, p.66). The debate circulated as it carried some element of division by race. Constitutionally, an individual’s race should be kept secret if they used other race’s facilities, yet the sanity of the ruling was in its own way.
Ideally, the white race views itself superior to the colored community despite the constitution’s opposing view. The presence of an egotistic mindset by ‘man’ upholds the existence of this superiority complex. This has made the white community to hold a sense of power over the other colored community. The abolishment of this element within the socials setup demands the mingling of both the white community and the colored community (Valdez, p.66). However, this cannot be enforced by law as it is against one’s rights. Should the races, therefore, seek social equality, it is demanded that they embrace mutual acceptance of each other’s race and who they are in person. After all, from the look of it, should the colored race attain the same status as the white community, the power change will occur, and the whites will have the same difficulties faced by the colored community.
The effect of the Plessy vs. Ferguson case was crucial in defining the constitutionality of segregation by race. The case was also critical in allowing the colored lawyers to find grounds to overturn the segregation laws. The Jim Crow laws were abolished and reduced any infringement of the black community.
Works cited
Valdez, R. B., Kahn, J., Graves Jr, J. L., Kaufman, J. S., Garcia, J. A., Lee, S. J. C., … & Miller, M. (2013). Mapping” race”: Critical approaches to health disparities research. Rutgers University Press.

Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies

/in /by

Submit Milestone Two, which is the second of two milestones for the final project in this course. For this milestone, you will complete Section III: People, Interests, Options, Criteria (PIOC) Analysis Overview and Section IV: Communication Strategies of the final project.

Milestone Two should incorporate your work from:

Module Four Small Group Discussion: Five Communication Strategy Recommendations
Module Four Discussion: ZOPA and BATNA for Alice Jones
Module Five Discussion: Proxemics
Module Five Assignment: Questions for the Negotiating Session
In your submission, you should recommend options that address both parties’ distributive and integrative interests, using both overt and tacit communication prompts that could be used in the negotiation meeting by Sharon Slade.

Consider blind spots that Sharon Slade may have (but may not be aware of) and that Alice Jones may know. You will want to refer to our readings on the Johari window that address this issue. Be sure to address these potential blind spots when formulating the negotiating positions that you will recommend to Sharon Slade. Doing this will increase the likelihood of reaching an integrative, win-win negotiation outcome.

Before submitting your assignment, be sure to check it against the Milestone Two grading rubric, which is in the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document. Refer to this document for more details about this assignment.

information cycle

/in /by

. How would you describe an Information Cycle in your own words to a friend?
2. List at least three (3) things that change over the course of an Information Cycle, and explain why these changes are signficant.
3. What is the most interesting or useful thing about Information Cycles?
4. Most of us get our information day-to-day from early points in the Information Circle. What are we missing when we don’t seek information from later stages in the cycle?
5. List 5 events that you’d like to examine through an Information Cycle. How do you think the Information Cycle would deepen your understanding of each event or topic?

2 pages, double spaced