Instructions For this assignment, you will select a homegrown violent extremist

/in /by

Instructions For this assignment, you will select a homegrown violent extremist from North America that we have not discussed in class and write a research paper by developing your own case study that addresses the four subject areas below: Develop an HVE case study of a group or individual of sound mind* not covered by our lessons. Some examples may include: Syed Farook and Tashfeen Malik in San Bernardino 2015, Muhammad Abdulazeez in Chattanooga 2015, Martin Couture-Rouleau or Michael Zehaf-Bibeau both in Canada 2014, Faisal Shahzad at Times Square in 2010, Carlos Bledsoe in Little Rock 2009, Eric Rudolph the right wing Atlanta Olympics bomber 1996, or even left wing extremists from the 1970s like The Weather Underground. What was the individual or groups grievance or cause? How was the individual or most group members recruited or draw to the cause? What was the process of radicalization? Which model discussed in this course most closely followed your case? What was the result of the extremism and how did the case end? *Note: If you choose a person, make sure you do not select someone who has a significant psychological disorder. As discussed in first week, this course specifically excludes those who are not of sound mind, since their extremism is not really the major factor behind their violence. For example, many mass shootings were undertaken by individuals who professed to have a political cause, but they turned out to be just exposing those beliefs without full comprehension or mental faculties. In other words, if the murderer was found unfit to stand trial (not mentally competent), then that is not an appropriate extremist for this paper. For these reasons do not select Robert Dear, Dylann Roof, Wade Michael Page and the like. While you can choose any North American homegrown violent extremist of sound mind that you want for this case study, I would highly recommend you select one who survived their attack and the trial is complete. Since you have to focus on why they did what they did, this is often impossible to assess if they were killed in the act (unless a manifesto was left behind). Additionally, if a case has yet to be tried in court, the defense often works hard to counter arguments of extremism before court and true motives become difficult to discern. If you pick someone killed in the act of terrorism, like at San Bernardino or Chattanooga then it is much more difficult to answer the questions assigned for this paper. In fact, in some cases it is impossible to do so if they did not leave behind any clear clues. This Midterm addresses the following course objectives: CO-1: Describe the psychological factors of terrorism as well as the ideologies that drive homegrown violent extremism. CO-2: Compare and contrast the different models and framework for the radicalization process. CO-3: Examine case studies of homegrown violent extremism in North America Technical Requirements Your paper must be at a minimum of 3-5 pages (the Title and Reference pages do not count towards the minimum limit). Scholarly and credible references should be used. A good rule of thumb is at least 2 scholarly sources per page of content. Type in Times New Roman, 12 point and double space. Students will follow the current APA Style as the sole citation and reference style used in written work submitted as part of coursework.

The post Instructions For this assignment, you will select a homegrown violent extremist appeared first on homework handlers.

Please keep the current event in San Diego county You are required to complete a

/in /by

Please keep the current event in San Diego county You are required to complete a short assignment which involves a current or historical event (no more than 5 years) at your local (no higher than the county level). Research a homeland security or emergency/disaster management issue that applies to what you have learned in the course thus far. You may use the textbook readings or course lecture materials. In a minimum of three (3) pages (double-spaced), Arial font, size 12, students are required to: Provide a synopsis of the local (no higher than the county level) emergency or disaster. 1.What occured? When? Who was involved (what parties or agencies? 2.Describe the impact of the event at your local level. Who was effected and how was the incident managed? 3.Discuss what you learned from the disaster as it relates to what you have learned in the course to this point. Remember what we have covered thus far (History of EM, Natural & Tech disasters and Risk Assessments, Mitigation and Preparedness). Link the real world event, to the course textbook and course material. 4.Conclude with a critical review of the lessons learned and the actions taken at the local level to mitigate and prepare for the next incident.

The post Please keep the current event in San Diego county You are required to complete a appeared first on homework handlers.

Please reply to this discussion by by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discove

/in /by

Please reply to this discussion by by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discovered in their evaluations and/or their examples of incivility could have been managed more effectively. Main post Effective open communication where all team members are heard and have a voice help to create a healthy civil work environment. The main focus of health care professionals is providing the highest quality care for patients. In order to do this all team members, need to be able to work together or patient safety is compromised. Workplace incivility can negatively affect nurses, hospitals, and patients. Plentiful evidence documents that nurses working in better nurse work environments have improved job and health outcomes (Smith, Morin, & Lake, 2018). My workplace scored an 86 on the work environment assessment determining it to be a very healthy workplace according to the assessment tool. The scores where highest for communication, teamwork and professional growth resources. My workplace would be considered a civil work environment. As a nurse I feel my workplace has made it a comfortable place to collaborate with team members including physicians without being made to feel I have overstepped my bounds. Of course, not all healthcare professionals are easy to work with but in general the facility encourages team collaborate, shared governance and cross-checking others without being reprimanded. When we nurture a culture of collaboration, we can synthesize the unique strengths that health- care workers of all disciplines bring to the workplace. In this way, we can make the workplace a civil place (Clark, 2015). I have encountered incivility in the workplace by a nurse manager at a facility I previously worked. There was very poor communication between staff members and an uneven balance of perceived power. Barriers to successful interprofessional collaboration include poor communication; lack of knowledge of other professional roles, perspectives, and language; minimal understanding of when and to whom to refer specific patient problems; the need for training in successful team function; and the need for evidence of improved patient outcome (Broome, & Marshall, 2021). The nurse manager on a daily basis, would yell at and berede a particular nurse at the nurse’s station in front of staff and patients. The manager would talk about the nurse’s personal life to other staff members and say the nurse was stupid and a bad nurse. Human resources and the director of nursing were made aware, yet the nurse managers behavior continued until the nurse quit and then the nurse manager did the same thing to another nurse. When an uncivil encounter occurs, we may need to address it by having a critical conversation with the uncivil colleague. We need to be well-prepared for this conversation, speak with confidence, and use respectful expressions. In this way, we can end the silence that surrounds incivility (Clark, 2015). References Broome, M., & Marshall, E. S. (2021). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. Clark, C.M. (2015). Conversations to inspire and promote a more civil workplace. American Nurse Today, 10(11), 18-23. Retrieved from https://www.americannursetoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf Smith, J. G., Morin, K. H., & Lake, E. T. (2018). Association of the nurse work environment with nurse incivility in hospitals. Journal of nursing management, 26(2), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.12537

The post Please reply to this discussion by by sharing ideas for how shortcomings discove appeared first on homework handlers.

For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for on

/in /by

For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment. As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter. You are encouraged to complete the Evidence-Based Practice: Basics and Guidelines activity before you develop the presentation. This activity consists of six questions that will create the opportunity to check your understanding of the fundamentals of evidence-based practice as well as ways to identify EBP in practice. The information gained from completing this formative will help promote success in the Stakeholder Presentation and demonstrate courseroom engagement—it requires just a few minutes of your time and is not graded. Demonstration of Proficiency •Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health. ?Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. •Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes. ?Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. •Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team. ?Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. •Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. ?Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes. •Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional, respectful manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style. Professional Context This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem. Scenario In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA. When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization. Instructions Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations. Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score. •Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. •Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. •Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. •Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. •Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style. There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example: •Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue. ?What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve? ?Why should the audience care about solving it? •Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach. ?Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue? ?How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal? •Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary. ?What is the objective? ?How likely is it to work? ?What will the interdisciplinary team do? •Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management. ?How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources? ?How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted? ?How does the plan justify the resource expenditure? •Part 5: Evaluation. ?What would a successful outcome of the project look like? ?What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success? ?How could this be used to show the degree of success? Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide. Additional Requirements •Number of slides: Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation. •Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old. •APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.

The post For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for on appeared first on homework handlers.