The second step of the data-gathering process is the actual collection of the da

/in /by

The second step of the data-gathering process is the actual collection of the data. There are many different ways to collect data, but one that is particularly common is the questionnaire. Asking pertinent questions from a suitably large sample of people can give you the information you need to define and solve the issue you have selected.
To prepare:
Think about the public policy and administration issue you have been examining throughout the course.
Consider what questions you might ask in order to collect more data.
For this Assignment:
Identify the public policy and administration issue you want to study and create a short 10-question interview or survey that might be used to collect qualitative data. Avoid questions with “yes” or “no” answers, and ask questions that will require some thought and explanation on the part of the interviewee.
**The issue that I would like to discuss is poverty and its relation to government assistance.**

The post The second step of the data-gathering process is the actual collection of the da appeared first on homework handlers.

For this Major Assignment 1, you will incorporate the Instructor’s feedback from

/in /by

For this Major Assignment 1, you will incorporate the Instructor’s feedback from parts 1 and 2 first. Then you will finalize this assignment by adding and completing Part 3: Potential for Social Change section. The detailed instructions, paper with feedback, and other helpful materials to complete this assignment will be uploaded in the files section. I have purchased 3 pages to start, however I am not sure how much space you will need based on the feedback given. I believe 3 page should be enough, but please inform me if more pages are needed. APA 7th edition is the standard for referencing.

The post For this Major Assignment 1, you will incorporate the Instructor’s feedback from appeared first on homework handlers.

Two questions below, one paragraph per question please. 1) Are scientific and t

/in /by

Two questions below, one paragraph per question please.
1) Are scientific and technological developments considered good or evil? Please explain your answer. Just because we have the technology does that mean we should be using it? What restrictions or protections should be in place before using new technologies? What examples can you think of that are relatively new technologies with both good and evil consequences?
2)The Human Genome Project was completed early and has long been thought to be a great success. However, with the advent of DNA home kits, many are beginning to question what this all means. Are there any dangers in finding out what genes you may of may not have? Does having the gene translate to acquiring the disease or disability? Can the genes be turned on or off? If you get rid of a gene or turn it off, will it return in the next generation? If society believes messing with genetics is bad news (https://www.technologyreview.com/2015/03/05/249167/engineering-the-perfect-baby/), then what should be done as a group to counteract the unknown of advancements of science, technology, and/or medicine?

The post Two questions below, one paragraph per question please.
1) Are scientific and t appeared first on homework handlers.

As you read in Dowsett’s (2014) article (attached) about biking on infrastructur

/in /by

As you read in Dowsett’s (2014) article (attached) about biking on infrastructure designed for cars, one key aspect of privilege is that people who are members of the dominant culture don’t necessarily see the ways that biased institutions and systems are designed to support them, or how they (intentionally or unintentionally) hinder others. Think carefully about this idea as you consider the different identities you hold. (Identity categories include race, gender, sexual orientation, citizenship status, disability status, body size, religion, ethnicity, class, age, etc.)
Contrast the concept of privilege with the idea of white immunity as described by Dr. Nolan Cabrera TedTalk (2018). Cabrera (2020) explains that describing the conditions white people experience in the U.S. as privilege disguises the fact that we’re talking about a baseline level of humanity that everyone is entitled to – systems that are designed to protect and serve us. When we flip the conversation and say that white people are protected (immune) from the discriminatory practices that Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) face, we center their experiences in a way that focuses on the injustice and creates space for empathy. He says:
“White privilege centers white people. People are constantly saying, ‘How am I privileged? How am I privileged?’ And instead white immunity actually says, ‘How is my experience markedly different than people of color?’ It’s asking you to say, ‘What is going on that’s outside of my experience? What have I been blinded to because of the social inoculation? So instead of centering white privilege, it makes you actually look holistically at society and how it is that we’re treating the most marginalized. It requires us to have a sense of empathy. A sense of linked fate. To say that my success and my ability to thrive is predicated upon yours as well” (Cabrera, 2018).
Submit a 500-word reflection about these concepts, responding to the following questions:
1. What is privilege? Provide a specific example of privilege resulting from an institutional or social system.
2. What is white immunity? How does it differ from the idea of privilege?
3. Do you think these terms are useful in helping us understand how social inequities prevent people from meeting their needs based on Max-Neef’s (1986) 9 Fundamental Needs (attached) or Raworth’s (2107) social foundation (attached)? Why or why not?

The post As you read in Dowsett’s (2014) article (attached) about biking on infrastructur appeared first on homework handlers.