Week 3 Assignment – Conflicting Viewpoints Essay: Part 1

/in /by

The assignment is divided into two parts: the prewriting paper (Part 1) due this week, and the essay (Part 2) due in Week 5.

Overview
When looking for information about a particular issue, how often do you try to resist biases toward your own point of view?

This assignment asks you to engage in this aspect of critical thinking by playing the “Believing Game.” The Believing Game is about making the effort to “believe,” or at least consider, the reasons for an opposing view on an issue.

Instructions
In the Week 2 Discussion, you examined the biases discussed in Chapter 2 of the webtext and reviewed one of the topics from Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues. You may use the same topic from this discussion or find another:
Select one of the topics from Pros & Cons of Controversial Issues, state your position on the issue, and identify three premises (reasons) listed under either the Pro or Con sectionwhichever section opposes your position.
For the three premises (reasons) that oppose your position on the issue, answer these believing questions suggested by Elbow:
What’s interesting or helpful in this view?
What would I notice if I believed this view?
In what sense or under what conditions might this idea be true?
Read the excerpt about critical thinking processes: The Believing Game and How to Make Conflicting Opinions More Fruitful [PDF].
Engage in prewriting to examine your thoughts.

Justice in the world of politics

/in /by

Justice in the world of politics
his assignment is an exercise in the critical analysis of a primary source text. Your essay should feature ample textual evidence in the form of quotations and citations. Quote and cite
the assigned edition of the text using in
–
text parenthetical citations that refer to the standardized numbers in the margins of the book.
For example:
Socrates
declares, “it’s better for all to be ruled by what is divine and prudent” (590d). The use of secondary sources is neither required nor recommended. If, however,any external sources are
consulted, whether scholarly or popular, even if you do not quote from them, full and proper bibliographical references to them are required
, plus footnotes wherever they are referenced specifically. You will not be penalized for conducting research beyond what is required, but you risk sanctions under the Academic Code of Conduct if you do not duly acknowledge that those resources were consulted. See the syllabus for
information regarding plagiarism.
Use 12
–
point Times New Roman font, double spacing, and one inch margins, and provide a word count. Essays that do not meet the assigned specifications may be returned ungraded.
Essays must be submitted in hard copy directly to the instructor by the end of class time (16:00) on Monday, February 27. Late papers will be
assessed a 10% penalty and accepted until
16:00 on Monday, March 6.
Extensions and Incompletes will only be granted for medical, bereavement, or victim of crime reasons only, with proper documentation.
To compose a complete and successful essay, you must:
•state your main argument up front in the first paragraph, directly and plainly, and remark upon its significance do not simply promise vaguely to discuss various subjects;
•
take a stand and advance an insightful argument of your own, in your own voice, through a
thoughtful analysis and interpretation of the text do not simply describe and summarize what is
said in the text;
•
focus your objectives and narrow your scope in a fashion befitting the time and space allotted for
this assignment do not attempt something too ambitious, broad, vague, or superficial;
•
allow your argument to govern and organize the paper as a whole and make its structure evident to the reader so that it is clear how the steps you take contribute to achieving your goals
—
the reader should never wonder why you are going on about something;
•
use the assigned edition of the text and provide ample evidence to support your reading of it,
including citations not only for every quotation but also when you are paraphrasing
—
that way the reader will be more impressed by how attentively and thoroughly you have examined the source material; give due consideration to possible counterevidence, objections, or alternative explanations
—
because ignoring them makes your argument weaker, not stronger;
•
carefully proofread your essay so that it actually says what you mean to say in polished prose.
******
********************
Additional Guidelines
Read the assigned text with an open mind and a generous spirit, maintaining a sense of wonder as you
approach it so that you may be open to learning something from it. Allow the elements of a text that seem
disagreeable or confusing to serve as occasions for further reflection and investigation. Make an effort to
understand the author’s positions before passing judgment on them. Nuance and even handedness are
preferable to simplification and one sidedness.
Stylistically, you may employ the first person (e.g., “At first, this seemed like a contradiction to me, but I will
argue that the apparent tension may be resolved by…”), but this assignment is not a venue for giving expression to your beliefs, opinions, pr
eferences, convictions, ideology, etc. Do not simply indicate whether or not you approve or disapprove of something on the basis of a selective reading of history, your take on
current events, or your personal values, priorities, or experiences. Neither rely on the correctness of your political opinions nor try to flatter the instructor by adopting what you take to be his views. For the purposes of this assignment, we cannot evaluate your personal views moral, political, religious, aesthetic, or otherwise.To prepare an argument of your own that does not simply restate material from the assigned text, consider drawing attention to the logic of an argument found in the assigned text, identifying and exploring its limits, deficiencies, or brilliance. Tease out unspoken assumptions or implications. Interrogate the meanings that words are given within the text and consider what they imply or entail. Observe connections between parts of the text, especially if something said in one place has significance for what is said elsewhere. Anything
you find perplexing provides an opportunity to uncover a puzzle and try to solve it.
An essay that accurately offers safe and simple observations, comparisons, or complaints is less
impressive than even a flawed endeavour to a
dvance something more complicated and penetrating. If you think you have found an easy answer, it probably isn’t worth offering.
Modest, provisional, or conditional conclusions are preferable to exaggerations regarding the scope and certitude of your conclusions. Acknowledge the limits of your own analysis.
Refrain from straightforwardly applying prefabricated interpretive frameworks, ideological lenses, or technical jargon foreign to the material under analysis. Also, strictly historical or biographical papers are not
suitable for this class. Avoid all reductionism.
References to historical context or impact, literary or cultural references, and illustrative examples of your own invention may be used to situate, supplement, or illuminate your argument, but they must not serve as decisive evidence or constitute the main focus of your essay.
Remember that quotations do not make arguments for you. Do not use excessive or long quotations to pad for length. Never cite lectures or classroom discussion as authoritative sources. You cannot appeal to secondary sources to save you the trouble of thinking through the text for yourself, either. Anyone else’s interpretations or criticisms must be evaluated using evidence and arguments of your own.Some rhetorical ado
rnment will enhance your paper, but avoid polemical excesses. Rhetorical questions in
particular rarely make arguments worth making, so use them sparingly. Do not waste the short space allotted to you in this assignment by relating biographical facts or broad references to historical context. Avoid long introductions or drawn out conclusions. Dive right into your
argument and make every sentence.

The post Justice in the world of politics appeared first on homework handlers.

RUSSIAN history 1917-1930(events)

/in /by

RUSSIAN history 1917-1930(events)
For each question, please use the reading and relative references, 1.5pages each (450 -500 words)
a) Discuss Stalin’s rise to power in the 1920s. Was Stalin’s consolidation of power based only on high politics (such as his use of the power of the Secretariat), or did his policies respond to more structural problems, pressures, and aspirations? Hint: Here are some elements you could consider: economic problems with NEP; Socialism in One County; legacies of World War I (remember the Holquist article) and Civil War mentality in the Party; impatience with NEP …. etc.
b) How does John Scott’s account of the building of Magnitogorsk reflect the objectives, failures, and successes of Stalin’s policies of rapid industrialization? Are the practical difficulties described in the account rooted in the policies of the 5-year plan, or are they due to poor implementation?
c) One historian of Russian has written that by the middle of 1918 “Russians of all classes were living under much greater sufferings than had been sufficient to bring about the fall of Kerensky.” Yet the Bolsheviks won the civil war. Explain this apparent paradox.
d) Boris Kolonitskii, in his article on “anti-bourgeois consciousness” that you read for this class conclude that the liberal government in fact had very little chance of surviving the turmoil of 1917. Do you agree? Why or why not?
For the following question, do a short answer, takes 2pages total!
Other study questions:
On 1917:
Why did the Bolsheviks succeed in taking power?
What were the sources of Bolshevik support?
Why did the Provisional Government lose popular support over the course of 1917?
What was the difference between Mensheviks and Bolsheviks. Why did this difference matter
for the outcome of 1917 ?
Why did the Bolsheviks not support the « Dual power » arrangement set up after February ? What were differences in the positions of the Provisional government and Bolsheviks? How did
these differences contribute Bolshevik success?
On the Civil war :
Why did the Bolsheviks win the Civil War?
Why did the Party embrace – then abandon – War Communism? What were the consequences of the Civil War?
On NEP : Why did the NEP fail?
What were the principal problems and tensions caused by NEP, and why did it create political
problems for the Party ?
Who opposed NEP and why ?
What was the role of each of the following in Stalin’s rise to power: Secretariat, economic
problems with NEP; Lenin’s “testament”; Socialism in One Country; Scissors’ and procurement crises; concepts of backwardness and attitudes towards peasants
On the “Great Turn” and coercion/purges :
Why did the Party launch its policy of forced collectivization ? What was its impact on agriculture,the peasantry, and economic development?
What was the link between collectivization and industrialization?
How was industrialization linked to coercive policies, and why?
How and why did the use of coercion take such proportions ?
 
 
Do you want your assignment written by the best essay experts? Then look no further. Our team of experienced writers are on standby to deliver to you a quality written paper as per your specified instructions. , and enjoy an amazing discount!!
 
 
 

The post RUSSIAN history 1917-1930(events) appeared first on homework handlers.

Week 5 Discussion 1 HSA 525

/in /by

There are two extremes when it comes to the power of providers to set prices. At one end is the provider who has no power and must accept the reimbursement rate set by others. At the other is the provider who sets the price, which third-party payers must accept. Neither sounds like a win-win scenario. We will explore these strategies in this weeks discussion post.

You are the business manager for Dr. Jones’s new medical practice. He is hoping to open in a few months but first wants to determine his prices. He has asked you to recommend whether he should set his own prices or accept those from third-party payers. After researching both options, provide a memorandum with your recommendation.

In your memo, first provide a brief discussion of what it means to be price setter or price taker. List the pros and cons of each one. Be sure to comment on the strategies that would be used in both scenarios. Finish the memo with your recommendation