|
Final Case Study: Consulting for the Caring Angel Hospital
|
Criteria
|
Unacceptable
Below 70% F
|
Fair
70-79% C
|
Proficient
80-89% B
|
Exemplary
90-100% A
|
1a. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve the quality of care.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve the quality of care.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve the quality of care.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve the quality of care.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve the quality of care.
|
1b. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to the organization.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to the organization.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to the organization.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to the organization.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to the organization.
|
1c. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve employee morale.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to improve employee morale.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to improve employee morale.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to improve employee morale.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to improve employee morale.
|
1d. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to design an efficient organizational chart.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to design an efficient organizational chart.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to design an efficient organizational chart.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to design an efficient organizational chart.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to design an efficient organizational chart.
|
1e. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create a strong team environment.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create a strong team environment.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to create a strong team environment.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create a strong team environment.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create a strong team environment.
|
1f. From a consulting perspective, propose the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create the hospital’s competitive edge.
Weight: 5%
|
Did not submit or incompletely proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create the hospital’s competitive edge.
|
Partially proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to create the hospital’s competitive edge.
|
Satisfactorily proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to add value to create the hospital’s competitive edge.
|
Thoroughly proposed the major steps that Caring Angel Hospital could take to create the hospital’s competitive edge.
|
2. Recommend one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Justify your recommendation. Weight: 20%
|
Did not submit or incompletely recommended one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Did not submit or incompletely justified your recommendation.
|
Partially recommended one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Partially justified your recommendation.
|
Satisfactorily recommended one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Satisfactorily justified your recommendation.
|
Thoroughly recommended one (1) approach that the hospital could use for acquiring a larger market share given the prevailing financial circumstances. Thoroughly justified your recommendation.
|
3. Investigate at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Provide at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
Weight: 25%
|
Did not submit or incompletely investigated at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Did not submit or incompletely provided at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
|
Partially investigated at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Partially provided at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
|
Satisfactorily investigated at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Satisfactorily provided at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
|
Thoroughly investigated at least two (2) value-added services that Caring Angel Hospital could offer to strengthen its value proposition. Thoroughly provided at least two (2) examples of the advantages of these value-added services to the hospital.
|
4.4 recent (i.e., last five [5] years) references
Weight: 5%
|
No references provided
|
Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices.
|
Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices.
|
5.Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5%
|
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting.
|
6.Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5%
|
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section.
|
In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style.
|
Most in-text citations and references are provided, and they are generally formatted correctly in APA style.
|
In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style.
|
7.Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5%
|
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations.
|
Sources are partially integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing.
|
8.Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5%
|
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is mostly clear and generally supported with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|
Information is provided in a clear, coherent, and consistent manner with reasons and evidence that logically support ideas.
|