Write a respond

Important Note:
1. Please write an essay that responds to the forum you choose:
This is the topic link I choose: http://bostonreview.net/forum-henry-farrell-bruce-schneier-democracys-dilemma

2. Your essay should incorporate an analysis of the main essay, a selection (at least three) of the responders, and any outside sources you deem relevant. 
Responder 1:
http://bostonreview.net/forum/democracys-dilemma/riana-pfefferkorn-dont-put-anonymous-speech-on-the-chopping-block

Responder 2: http://bostonreview.net/forum/democracys-dilemma/joseph-s-nye-jr-sharp-power-not-soft-power-should-be-target

Responder 3: http://bostonreview.net/forum/democracys-dilemma/anna-grzymala-busse-defense-norms

3.Please use regular, basic  Grammarly to understand easily. A clear thesis and supporting points.

4. 8 pages google doc.

5. Provide a clear thesis and supporting points.

6. Don’t forget to include the work cited

Othello play analysis

OTHELLO PROMPT: According to a recent analysis of Othello, Othellos dramatic fate is to have his exceptionality neutralized, his centrality decentered, pushed back to the margins ostensibly delegated to sociopaths like Iago, but in fact reserved for racial, ethnic, and cultural outsiders like Othello. It is Shakespeares playnot just Iagos planthat stages this transaction, that shapes the complex or paradigm the Moor inhabits and fulfills. In sum, Othello stages a fantasy of inclusion, a glamorous bridging of differences, only to restate, in the starkest manner, the terms of exclusion it seems initially to discredit. What do you make of this analysis? How does it help explain the series of reductionsin stature, dignity, self-control, and self-possessionOthello suffers in the second half of the play, including (but not limited to) his increasingly servile relationship to Iago, his verbally disorganized lapse into a trance, his striking of Desdemona, her ritualized murder and his similarly ritualized suicide? How does Shakespeare make Othellos race, culture, or ethnicity seem to figure in his so-called lapse into savagism? Is the critic right to conflate Shakespeares play with Iagos plan? If not, how might the two be distinguished?

Value of Literature

Essay 4 Instructions

Over the past few months, we’ve read poems, a play, short stories, and creative nonfiction. Choose at least two of the assigned works from this semester (see the Course Schedule for the list) and explain what insights, understanding, or empathy can be gained from reading them. What is the value of literature that deals with such topics or perspectives?

Use information from at least one secondary source from the databases to assist in your analysis and at least one of the TED Talks to support your argument.

Ted Talks Links

Requirements:
Write an essay of at least 1200 words in response to the above prompt. This includes the first word of the essay to the last word of the essay; the essay title, heading, and Works Cited page are not included in the word count.
Follow the MLA Format instructions from Module 0.
Use information from at least four sources as explained above.
Use in-text, parenthetical citations in MLA format each time you paraphrase, summarize, or quote directly from the source.
Include a corresponding MLA-formatted Works Cited page.
Use third-person academic voice. Do NOT use first person (I, me, my, we, us, our) or second person (you, your).
Use the literary present tense (say “the narrator writes in her journal” not “the narrator wrote in her journal”).
Save and submit your work as either Microsoft Word (.doc or .docx) or a Rich Text Document (.rtf).
The Originality Report generated by Turn It In must not exceed 25%. Submit work early to review the report and contact your instructor with questions.
Essays that do not meet the requirements of the assignment will not receive a passing grade.

Metaphysics philosophy response paper

Metaphysics response paper
Must meet 2,000 word count

The paper should consist in a comparative and evaluative treatment of the metaphysical views.

1. Are properties tropes or universals?

You should proceed in this fashion: first introduce the question. Then introduce Answer A, followed by Answer B. Then discuss the relative strengths and weakness of Answer A and Answer B.