Every eligible person should vote in all local, state, and national elections. Agree or disagree.

/in /by

The lead-in is interesting, relevant, and states importance of issue.
The thesis clearly states the writers position on the issue.
The essay gives at least two, major, well-developed points of argument. (Essay is more than 650 words because of strong development.)
The essay does not include any logical fallacies; the argument makes sense.
The essay addresses at least two counter-arguments; the strongest point(s) of opposition is/are clearly stated.
There is convincing refutation or accommodation of each counter-argument; the writer makes it clear that his or her side is better than the oppositions.
The writer has considered the emotions and values of the audience, establishes credibility, and has taken care not to alienate or offend the audience.
The essay is well-organized and easy to follow.
The essay is virtually free of grammar and usage errors.
The essay uses properly documented material in MLA format from TWO credible secondary sources provided in the unit. 
The essay includes a properly formatted Works Cited page and the in-text citations clearly match the Works Cited entries.

The B essay demonstrates clear overall proficiency, and it presents strong arguments that properly refute the stated counter-arguments, but it demonstrates SLIGHT weaknesses in two of the numbered elements that make it fall short of overall excellence.
The C essay is average.  It demonstrates understanding of the elements of argument and does address counterargument, but it may have clear weaknesses in three of the numbered elements.

TheD essay is below average. It demonstrates significant weaknesses related to the elements of argument and /or may be lacking some of the required elements. A two essay may have distracting weaknesses in four of the numbered elements. An essay that may otherwise be in the upper tier but that does not demonstrate a basic grasp of properly incorporating and documenting sources may earn a D.

The F essay is well below average.  It demonstrates significant, distracting or confusing weaknesses in more than four of the numbered elements. An essay that includes a significant amount of undocumented secondary source material or that is significantly underdeveloped or incomplete may also earn an F. An essay without a Works Cited page can not earn higher than an F.

Your stance on Wiesenthals dilemma compared to three respondents

/in /by

Grading criteria:

Timely completion — you must submit your essay before 5:35 pm on Thursday, 12/3. You need to write this essay during our Zoom meeting on 12/3, starting from 3:30 pm.
Academic essay — your essay shows a clear academic essay structure: introduction, body, and conclusion.
MLA format — your essay shows accurate and complete formatting based on MLA, including a works cited page.
Quality of Response — your essay addresses all three items listed on the task description under “Assignment.”
THiNK — chapter 9: your essay aligns well with the concepts and terms from this chapter.
Clarity and Depth of Reflection: your essay shows college-level clarity and depth of reflection, and it captures the multiple authors’ viewpoints accurately (3 correspondents from the book). Your essay also shows apt transitions between paragraphs, ideas, and connections.
Evidence for supporting your argument — your essay shows at least three different integrations of quotes from the book, done accurately using MLA style.

Opioid Use, Addiction, and Overdoses

/in /by

Read pages  177 – 189 in the text (attached)
Be sure to include factual, properly cited information in your post.
Opioid use, addiction, and overdoses have increased to alarming rates in the United States in recent years. Millions of Americans are affected by the opioid epidemic every day. Read Volkow et al.s (2014) article and pages 1-4 in Browns (2018) article (attached) before discussing the following questions:

What are some ways that opioid addiction is affecting the United States?
What are some forms of treatment available to those suffering from opioid addiction?
If you had a friend or family member suffering from opioid addiction, what sort of help would you recommend they seek?

references:
References:
Brown, A. R. (2018). A systematic review of psychosocial interventions in treatment of opioid addiction, Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1533256X.2018.1485574

Coon, D., Mitterer, J.O., & Martini, T. (2019). Introduction to psychology: Gateways to mind and behavior (15th ed.). Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.

Volkow, N. D., Frieden, T. R., Hyde, P. S., & Cha, S. S. (2014). Medication-assisted therapies tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. New England Journal of Medicine, 370(22), 2063-2066. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1402780

its comparing 2 artworks the main artwork by donald judd 1966

/in /by

Remember, ultimately, your goal is to interpret your chosen artwork  my chosen artwork is Donald Judd untitled 1966. and compared to Brancusi’s endless column
your point of view, what is the central issue that the artwork is addressing? How would you
articulate the main point that the artwork is making? How is this point communicated through the
artworks form and/or presentation?
Brancusi’s endless column  is a discrete form that makes sense in of itself
where the thing of minimalism it becomes Installation based where you cant see the artwork apart from the architecture thats whats going on with Donaled judd untitled  , so that framework for understanding sculpture is what hal foster  pushes it into postmodernism
In terms of the overall form, voice, and tone of your final essay, I leave those decisions up to you. If
you wanted to write a straightforward analysis in a scholarly voice that begins with a formal
introduction and ends with a conclusion, that is of course perfectly fine. If you wanted to write a
more creative work, such as a short story, letter, or imaginary interview with the artist, for
example, that would be fine, too. The only stipulation is that your text must incorporate the
following elements:
a full description of the artwork Judd untitled 1966
a thesis that represents your interpretation of the chosen artwork
an analysis of an assigned reading(foster crux of minimalism) in relation to the chosen artwork (Donald Judd untitled)
an instructive comparison to another artwork (Brancusi’s endless column )
images of the artworks referred to in your paper (included at the end of your paper and
labeled as fig.)
a title that reflects the thesis of your paper
In terms of length, your final writing assignment should be 57 pages long, double-spaced, using 12
pt. font and 1 margins.
Your final writing assignment will be graded holistically, with a focus on the following aspects: how
clear and convincing the argument is, how vividly and attentively you describe your chosen
artwork, how logically and meaningfully you relate your chosen artwork to an assigned reading and
to another artwork, grammar and other mechanical issues.