There are four remaining threats that you did not discuss in your PowerPoint. This assignment will focus on two of those four. Here are the specific tasks you will complete:
Review the remaining four threats that you did not use in Presentation on the Threats to the Global Environment.
Pick two of the four to focus on in Analysis on the Threats Defense Argument assignment. (1) Poor health of entire population (2) Lack of education Opportunities ( these are the two I chose for the assignment)
Identify the reasons why you think these two threats are less critical than the four threats you chose for your PowerPoint presentation.
Step II. Prepare Your Report
The U.N. has given you the following guidelines.
Introduction
Briefly introduce the topic of the analysis (about 100–150 words):
State the topic and intent of the paper.
Identify the two threats you will discuss in the paper in the order in which they appear in the paper.
Section I. Threat 1
Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat.
Write one page giving three reasons that explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in the Presentation on the Threats to the Global Environment assignment.
Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.
Section II. Threat 2
Write an opening statement describing the perception of the threat.
Write one page giving three reasons to explain why you saw this threat as less critical than the four you chose for your presentation in the Presentation on the Threats to the Global Environment assignment.
Support these reasons with at least three credible sources.
Conclusion
Offer a summary (one page or less) of your defense of your choices that the United Nations can use to address their prioritization concerns.
Formatting Requirements
Your paper may consist of up to four pages (not including the cover or reference pages).
Create headings for each section of your paper as follows:
Introduction.
Threat 1 (include the name of your chosen threat).
Threat 2 (include the name of your chosen threat).
Conclusion.
Use and cite 4–6 credible sources in your analysis. You may use the same source for more than one threat as long as you use a minimum of four different sources. A list of potential resources is available at the end of this course guide.

The post There are four remaining threats that you did not discuss in your PowerPoint. Th appeared first on homework handlers.

I know this might be difficult to do since I was the one that did took the training , but if you think you can obtain this information on your own please let me know and don’t just take this assignee to take it.
INSTRUCTIONS
Part A.  The CITI Ethics Training spoke of both Laud Humphreys,  Tearoom Trade and the infamous Tuskeegee Study. In addition, the readings and videos reported on the Milgram study on obedience and the Zimbardo  Prison Experiment.
Using one of these four studies as an example, explain how the study violated (or not) each of the three basic principles of research ethics:  beneficence, justice and respect for persons, using materials from the Belmont Report.
Before you use each concept, find the definition of the concept and quote and cite the definition adding clarification and/or explanation in your own words if needed.  If you care to learn more about these studies, there is quite a bit of high-level information on the web.  If you use any of it, you must cite it properly. 
Part B.  For the study you have chosen, can you think of a way to get similar data in an ethical way?  If yes, explain how.  If no, explain why.  It does not matter whether you decide to say yes or no as long as you can support your decision. (probably about one page) The study I choose was Technology Addiction !

The post I know this might be difficult to do since I was the one that did took the train appeared first on homework handlers.