Rhetorical Appeal to help change peoples minds on civil rights and BLM

The prompt question is In order to change peoples minds, which strategies/techniques should a civil rights movement use today? i chose logos as my strategy so please base it around that and put that in the thesis statement. I put my writing rubric in the files, i want to average a 4 or 5 score on all of the writing categories on it. Could you use terms and literature best used by a junior in highschool so its not unrealistic. I need to have 3 specific sources used in the essay, and it needs to be 11 point font, double spaced, and times new roman. i put the rubric for grading the essay in the files, as well as a basic structure setup for the essay assigned by my teacher, a page of the list of sources i can use, i need to use at least 3 of them in the essay, and some other information about whats needed in the essay.

Efficiency and Adaption

Part I

In Module 1 you were first introduced to communities. Organisms within communities interact primarily through the following ways: competition, predation, and symbiosis. Read about the unusual relationship documented between Ethiopian wolves and Gelada monkeys at the website below or read about the symbiotic relationship between badgers and coyotes. Chose only one of the articles below to answer Part I using the following questions:

Luntz, S. (2015). Symbiotic partnership between monkeys and wolves discovered. Accessed on IFL Science on August 16, 2016, at http://www.iflscience.com/plants-and-animals/monkey-wolf-symbiosis/
or

Haemig, P. D. (2012). Badger-coyote associations. Ecology. Info 11. Retrieved from http://www.ecology.info/badger-coyote.htm
What type of relationship is found between the Gelada monkeys and Ethiopian wolves or badgers and coyotes?
What are the short-term and long-term benefits for each species you read about in the article you selected?
What are some of the costs for each of the species as a result of their mutual relationship?
Do you think their relationship could change if resources became scarce? Why or why not?
Part II

Now consider the benefits and costs to businesses in the marketplace: Choose one of the following businesses that are now extinct: Circuit City, Pan Am, or Tower Records. Address the following questions in Part II of your assignment:

What were some of the long-run costs associated with operating the business?
Who were their competitors?
What were the factors that contributed to the decision to shut down the business?
Do you think your chosen company could have been successful by adopting a mutually beneficial partnership, similar to organisms in the wild? Why or why not?

Organize this essay assignment using subtitles that summarize the topic from each question above. For example, to answer Question 1, use a descriptive subtitle like the following: Part I: Symbiotic Relationship Between Coyotes and Badgers

session 5 final paper

Your final paper consists of the following two parts.

Part 1

Compare and contrast an idea from your Lexical Study (Learning Activity: Session 3) and an idea Genre & Context (Learning Activity: Session 4) with the material contained in the commentary you selected in Session 1 in addition to two other commentaries (online and/or library). Address the following questions:

How do ideas from your previous studies of your definitive text contrast with the material found in the commentaries?
What do you do with these contrasting ideas (i.e. synthesize them, choose between them)? Why?
How are you challenged by the interpretive differences between your work and the work you researched? How did your research protect you from you?
Part 1 of you paper needs to be 2 pages in length and must use cited support from the three commentaries that you have selected. Be sure to include these commentaries in your reference page.

Part 2

For the second part of your final, you must take what you have learned about the issue and definitive text (1 passage) you selected in Session 1 and use it to clearly express the intent of the Biblical author of the text and how it pertains to your selected issue. Use the research you have been doing each week to assist in developing your paper and integrate conclusions from Part 1 of your final paper into Part 2. Place yourself in the role of mentor, teacher, pastor, or simply a stranger in a coffee shop. Image that someone asks you to explain what the Bible says about the topic you selected at the beginning of the course (ethical social media use, environmental stewardship, gay marriage, abortion, legalization of marijuana, alcohol use, adoption, animal rights, war & terrorism, depression, adultery, overeating, self discipline, prayer, or missional living). Consider this paper a response to that person.

You should at least provide pertinent information on authorship, context of the verse within the surrounding verses, and the rest of the book of the Bible, and comments on any significant words. As a result of this study, determine what the Scripture says on the issue and draw from this research principles that one may use in life and counseling.

Part 2 of your paper needs to be 3 pages in length and must reference and cite the various resources with which you have become familiar namely, your Hebrew-Greek study Bible, Bible dictionary/encyclopedia, lexicon, concordance, online resources, etc. Remember, this is not your opinion, but what the Word of God says in relation to your topic it is the Word that carries the authority, not you. This part of your final paper should contain a minimum of 5 additional sources, three of which being non-web sources (e-books and library databases are not considered web sources). These sources can be the same as those that you used in previous assignments.

Submission Requirements

Compile both parts into a single paper and use headings in your paper to distinguish Part 1 from Part 2. Both parts combined will be 5 pages in length, not including the cover and reference page. References for both parts (minimum of eight sources) should be in a single reference page. Format your paper and citations according to APA guidelines. Submit your completed paper by the posted due date.

Case Report: Translational Research and Evidence-Based Practice

The purpose of this assignment is to apply critical problem-solving skills to propose a solution for an identified practice problem.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
    Use at least two scholarly research sources included in 30 selected articles. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
    Required to use APA style.
    This assignment uses a rubric. Please Review the rubric prior to the beginning to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
    Required to submit this assignment to TurnItIn
Directions:
Reflect on the Implementation into Practice assignment that identified gaps between research findings and the implementation of those findings into practice. For this assignment, build on that previous research to identify a specific area of patient practice (e.g., acute care hospital, clinic, primary care, long-term care, home health) related to your project where process improvement would be beneficial. The need for process improvement could be on account of the gap between the implementation of research findings into practice or could be related to other issues, such as specific disease processes or administrative issues.
Once the topic has been identified, summarize relevant research, create an action plan to improve the process, and formulate potential methods for evaluating the effectiveness of the process changes. Research should be evidence-based and, where possible, pulled from the 30 articles selected for your literature review.
In a concise case report of 500-750 words, include the following:
1.    Introduction – Include a problem statement that addresses the patient practice process in need of improvement.
2.    Brief synthesized review of relevant evidence-based literature.
3.    Description of the case/situation/conditions.
4.    Action plan that outlines proposed solutions to improve gaps or inefficiencies based on the research, as well as methods for mitigating potential barriers to implementation.
5.    Conclusion – Include a proposal for evaluating the effectiveness of the recommended changes.