Dramatic Literature class- Othello and Medea essay- EASY!!

/in /by

Hello,
This is rather simple. Please follow the directions below. The professor is a easy grader. It does not need to be too complex. Can be 1-2 pages depending on the amount of paragraphs for the answer of the question.

**** SCRIPTS ARE ATTACHED, ONLY GO BY THE SCRIPTS*****

Choose ONE question to answer from EACH of the two groups. You will answer one question about MEDEA and one question about OTHELLO. Write it in essay format. For example, you’ll want to make it clear which play you are referencing and introduce the topic before jumping right into your answer.

MEDEA: Choose ONE of these and write 1-3 paragraphs to answer . You can quote from the test if you want

1) Usually the protagonist has a ‘tragic flaw’ that leads to his or her own destruction, but in MEDEA, it is Jason (the Antagonist) who has personality flaws that lead to his destruction. Discuss the mistakes he makes in the play that lead Medea to destroy him and all he loves.

2) Is Medea a sympathetic character? Does she remain sympathetic the whole play,, or is there a point at which you stopped being on her side?

3) In Medea’s first long speech to the chorus (lines 213-261), she claims that women are afflicted with the most “wretched” existence on earth. How is gender explored in the play? Is Medea a positive or negative example of a feminist heroine?

OTHELLO: Choose ONE of these and write 1-3 paragraphs to answer. You can quote from the text if you want.

1) In Iago’s ‘I Hate The Moor’ speech in Act I, scene 3, he claims that he has heard rumors that Othello has slept with Iago’s wife, Emilia, and that he will use that for an excuse to destroy him. Does Iago really care about Emilia,or is there another reason why he would get revenge for this? What other moments in the play suggest that rumor might be true?

2) What is the importance of the Handkerchief, and how does Iago use it as a prop to further destroy Othello?

3) How does Othello’s final speech affect our opinion of him? Why does he kill himself?

Here is the criteria of how it will be graded:
Topic introduced properly—–15.0 pts
complete paragraph form——20.0 pts
question answered fully——–50.0 pts
grammar, spelling and punctuation—–15.0 pts

Video Discussion: Faith & the Public Square

/in /by

First, watch the 1-hour documentary video, Soul of a Nation (Links to an external site.), in its entirety. (This is the fifth of 6 episodes in the PBS Frontline series, God in America (Links to an external site.).)

Second, post your carefully considered response to the following prompt in a paragraph of at least 6  sentences:

This video portrays the efforts of both Christian church leaders and politicians to “marry” faith and democracyin a nation that values the separation of church and state. As Christians, we believe that faith touches all aspects of life, public and private, and as Americans, we believe that the state should not define the church (nor vice versa), in order to protect both.

Consider a person or event from this video and describe how, in your view, they/it either did or did not maintain a healthy balance between Christian faith and political endeavors. Use specific details from the video as evidence of your position.

Finally, thoughtfully read and engage at least 2 of your colleagues’ responses with a substantive reply of at least 4 sentences each. Each reply needs to answer this question: Do you agree with your colleague’s assessment of the person or event they chose? If you do agree, provide additional specific evidence that further supports their assessment from the video and/or readings. If you do not agree, charitably explain why you differ and support your own view with specific evidence from the video and/or readings.
Below are links to the videos for the assignment

https://www.pbs.org/video/frontline-god-in-america-five-soul-of-a-nation/

http://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/view/

Debating Ability Testing

/in /by

For your initial post, you will present at least two viewpoints debating professional approaches to assessment used in psychology for your assigned age group. Please see the list below for your assigned age group. In addition to the required reading, research a minimum of one peer-reviewed article from the Ashford University Library on ability testing research at is pertains to your assigned age group. 

In your initial post, you must 

  • Briefly compare and discuss at least two theories of intelligence and the contemporary assessment measures related to those theories.
  • Analyze challenges related to assessing individuals in your assigned age group and describe any special ethical and sociocultural issues which must be considered. 
  • Analyze and provide evidence from validation studies supporting and opposing the use of specific instruments with your assigned population.
  • Present the pros and cons of individual versus group assessment of ability.
  • Summarize the implications of labelling and mislabeling individuals in your assigned age group as a result of testing and assessment. 

Last name begins with

  • A through E: Preschool-aged children through age 7
  • F through J: Children ages 7 through 16
  • K through O: Adolescents and young adults ages 16 through 25
  • P through T: Adults ages 26 through 60
  • U through Z: Adults age 61 and older

Guided Response: Review several of your colleagues’ posts and respond to at least two of your peers, at least of one whom was assigned a different age group than you, by 11:59 p.m. on Day 7 of the week. You are encouraged to post your required replies earlier in the week to promote more meaningful interactive discourse in this discussion. Be sure to review the assigned articles before constructing your reply. 

Which of the assessment instruments presented by your classmate demonstrates the strongest validity, and which (if any) do not show strong validity for the age group being discussed? Were there appropriate age, socioeconomic, language, and/or cultural considerations your classmate did not mention but should have been included in her or his initial post? What ethical consideration(s), in addition to those mentioned by your classmate, might you recommend be included? Provide a rationale for the inclusion of these considerations. Use information from the required resources as well as any other appropriate peer-reviewed articles to support your statements. Continue to monitor the discussion forum until 5:00 p.m. Mountain Standard Time (MST) on Day 7 of the week and respond to anyone who replies to your initial post. 

Carefully review the Discussion Forum Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate this Discussion Thread.

 

. WITH nursingessayswriters.com AND GET AN AMAZING DISCOUNT!

The post Debating Ability Testing appeared first on nursingessayswriters.com.

Debating Ability Testing was first posted on November 11, 2020 at 10:57 pm.
©2019 "nursingessayswriters.com". Use of this feed is for personal non-commercial use only. If you are not reading this article in your feed reader, then the site is guilty of copyright infringement. Please contact me at admin@nursingessayswriters.com

 

“Are you looking for this answer? We can Help click Order Now”

Relationships Essay

/in /by

You will submit a paper analyzing the process and content of either one or two relationships in your life, using as many terms and concepts from the text and lecture notes as you can. If you write about two relationships, you will need to compare and contrast the experience you had with each person. The paper should be typed, double-spaced, and no fewer than four full and no more than six pages. THESE PAPERS MUST BE IN ESSAY FORM and conform to the conventions of English grammar and usage. Consider any of the following questions as potential issues to examine: 1) How did this relationship begin? Describe the process of relationship development, using the Knapp model of stages of relationships. 2) Has the relationship experienced deterioration? Describe and discuss. 3) Discuss the role played by self-disclosure in the relationship 4) Discuss the role by your self-concept and the process of perception in your relationship. How have misunderstandings arisen? How have they been resolved? 5) Discuss the use of words/verbal language in the relationship. Have there been instances of ambiguity or an excess of you language that you can recall? 6) Discuss the use of nonverbal communication in the relationship. How have body language, vocal tone, time, clothing, and distance/space played a role in the relationship? 7) Discuss how listening has played a part in the success and/or failure in the relationship. What style of listening is used most often in the relationship? How can the listening process be improved? 8) If the relationship in ongoing, what do you see for the future? Does the relationship require a significant amount of maintenance or repair? What would be required for the relationship to terminate? 9) How have the concepts of power and control played out in the relationships? Who is the more dominant party you, or the other party? Why? Is there a significant amount of power inequity? If so, what would be required for the power structure to be more equally balanced? 10) What theory of relationship development and/or deterioration most closely characterizes this relationship attraction, reinforcements, social exchange, or equity? 11) How is conflict managed in the relationship? What cultural and gender differences exist in the relationships, in terms of expectations, communication patterns, and conflict management? For romantic relationships: What category of love is most approximated eros, agape, philos, storge, ludus, pragma, or mania? What is your love language and that of your partner? For friendship relationships: By what type of friendship is this relationship characterized? Have gender or cultural issues played a role in this friendship? Describe any issues raised in pgs. 326-332 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this friendship relationship. If this is a family member, discuss the communication pattern that most closely describes the relationship. Describe any issues raised in pgs. 319-326 of Adler/Proctor which have any bearing on this family relationship.