Over the past six years, a stock produced returns of 12%, 16%, -3%, 7%, -5%, and 9%. Based on these six years, what range of returns would you expect to see 95% of the time?
a.-18.58% to 26.58%
b.-14.28% to 25.28%
c.-10.69% to 22.69%
d.-2.34% to 14.34%
e.-23.18% to 31.48%
Analyze key psychological and sociological issues related to hackers and the potential impact on individual organizations and society as a whole.
The class discusses ethical and nonethical hacker personalities and motivations, and profiling tools used by law enforcement in combating cyber threats.
Topic 1: Hacker Motivation and Threat Mitigation
Explain what psychological factors can often motivate hackers (eg, addiction, crime, greed, status, etc….), and give examples where these motivations were a factor in a cyberattack.
What can organizations do to be more proactive in identifying and mitigating hacker threats?
Background:
1. Crime and Punishment: The Psychology of Hacking in the New Millennium [2003 – older but, I believe, still relevant and a solid short introduction]
2. Understanding a Hacker’s Mind: A Psychological Insight into the Hijacking of Identities [2004 – RSA. Also still useful]
3. The Risk Propensity and Rationality of Computer Hackers [2010 ]
Topic 2: Ethical and Nonethical Hackers
As the cybersecurity field expands, the larger community discourse leads to changes in terminology. While some of our course materials may differentiate between the terms “hackers” and “crackers” as threat actors, we will use the terms “ethical hackers” and “nonethical hackers” to make the same differentiation.
How do the profiles for ethical and nonethical hackers differ? Should these psychological attributes make a difference as to the amount of, or nature of the punishment meted out to those who are caught? Why or why not?
Describe how certain factors can also motivate ethical hackers, or those who defend against cyberattacks (sometimes called cyber warriors or cyber patriots)? (eg, revenge, patriotism, fear of government abuse, pride, respect for the law, ownership, anger, retaliation….)
Background: Hacking for the Homeland: Patriotic Hackers vs. Hacktivists [2013 – abstract only.
. .
The post Analyze key psychological and sociological issues related to hackers and the potential impact on individual organizations and society as a whole. Course Objective appeared first on nursingessayswriters.com.
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
The post Analyze key psychological and sociological issues related to hackers and the potential impact on individual organizations and society as a whole. Course Objective appeared first on Nursing Writers Hub.
You will apply quantitative research methods when you develop an abbreviated quantitative research plan that seeks to answer your research problem and research questions/hypotheses.
To prepare for this Application, first focus on the following instructions:
Next, ask yourself the following questions:
The assignment:
Please see below the scenario to use for this assignment.
“Stress pervades many areas of life. Whether it is stress from relationships, work, school, or the social environment, research has shown that it can have a profound impact on mental health, physical well-being, productivity, performance, and decision making. Research on cognitive appraisals, coping, and social support has also provided insight into how people view and manage stress.” (Note: You may tailor your research plans based on this research problem scenario to your area of specialization).
The post Draft Quantitative Plan appeared first on nursingessayswriters.com.
For this assignment you will begin to grow as a scholar and researcher by relying on scholarly texts and resources and not the textbooks required for this course. It is important to note that as a general rule, textbooks are not scholarly resources because they do not contain original research. Search the library for peer-reviewed journal articles or texts that discuss the four paradigms listed below; complete the assignment based on the information you find in the library.
CANNOT USE ANY OF THESES BOOKS
Babbie, E. (2016). The practice of social research (14th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
Glesne, C. (2016). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Ravitch, S. M., & Riggan, M. (2017). Reason & rigor: How conceptual frameworks guide research. Thousand Oaks: CA. Sage.
Thomas, G. (2013). How to do your research project: A guide for students in education and applied social sciences. London: Sage.
Write a 700- to 1,050-word paper comparing and contrasting the following research paradigms:
Address the following questions:
The post University of Phoenix Research Assignment first appeared on nursingessayswriters.com.
