I need assistance bringing together my second chapter, literature review. I have

/in /by

I need assistance bringing together my second chapter, literature review. I have provided my introduction to give you an understanding of the dissertation topic. The literature review document starts with the direction from my supervisor and includes approx 2700 words of the literature review I have completed. The total word count for the chapter is 5000 (approx), however if my work needs to be reworked I may need more than 2300 words.

The post I need assistance bringing together my second chapter, literature review. I have appeared first on homework handlers.

Peculiarities of the neural infections by HIV were not considered, although inte

/in /by

Peculiarities of the neural infections by HIV were not considered, although intensely investigated in the last three decades. Please include a short chapter about HIV and about the effects of HIV infection on brain function (HIV encephalopathy) which are motoric (impairment of fine motor skills), cognitive (memory and concentration disorders, slowing of perception and responsiveness) and emotional impairments.
Even though numerous studies were dealing with the role of retroviruses in molecular genetics, the partaking of non-retroviral RNA viral remnants must not be neglected in such a review article. Please add a sentence in order to point-out the important role of non-retroviral RNA viral remnants.
Please also add a chapter about the presence of Bornaviruses (BDV/BoDV), typical neuroviral agents, in this group of non-retroviral RNA viral remnants. Horie et al described in 2010* that RNA sequences of BDV have been found in 40 million year-old fossils (Horie et al 2010). Activated segments of BDV might be the agent of mostly lethal encephalitides of horses since the 1880ies (Zwick et al 1939**). And in the middle of the 1980ies signs of persistent infection by BDV were detected in the sera of psychiatric patents, first of all in those suffering from major depressive disorder (Rott et al 1985***). More recently, sporadic cases of acute, non-purulent, lethal BDV encephalitides are appearing first of all in Southern Germany (Schlottau et al 2018****). Please include these references.
The reference Feschotte et al is listed twice, marked with numbers 6 and 63. Please remove ref 63.
Please include the following references:
*Horie M et al (2010) Endogenous non-retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes. Nature 463:84-88
**Zwick W (1939) Bornasche Krankheit und Encephalomyelitis der Tiere. In: Gildenmeister, Haagen, Waldmann: Handbuch der Viruskrankheiten II, 254-354 (Fischer, Jena)
***Rott et al (1985) Detection of serum antibodies to Borna disease virus in patients with psychiatric disorders. Science 228:755-756
****Schlottau et al (2018) Fatal encephalitic Borna disease virus 1 in solid-organ transplant recipients. N Eng J Med 359:1377-1379

The post Peculiarities of the neural infections by HIV were not considered, although inte appeared first on homework handlers.

Introduction: slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the

/in /by

Introduction: slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the presentation. Include speaker’s notes that explain, in more detail, what will be covered.
Evidence-based projects: slide should explain the general importance of master’s-prepared nurses engaging in evidence-based projects related to nursing practice and profession. Provide speaker’s notes with additional detail and support from at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).
Conceptual Model: slide should provide an illustration of a conceptual model that could be used to develop an evidence-based project. Possible models include The John’s Hopkins or Advancing Research and Clinical Practice through Close Collaboration (ARCC) Models or you may select another model you find in the literature. In the speaker’s notes, explain how the model would be applied to the development of an evidence-based project. Provide support from at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).
Area of Interest: identify an area of interest related to NP practice in which a practice change may be needed. Slide should identify the area of interest and what is currently known on the topic. Speaker’s notes more fully explain what is currently known and should provide rationale for why the area of interest is important to NP practice. Provide support from at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).
Issue/concern and recommendation for change: slide should identify a specific concern related to your general area of interest and your recommendation for a practice change. Speaker’s notes should more fully explain the recommended change and rationale for the change. Recommendation should be supported by at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).
Factors Influencing Change: slide should identify at least 2 internal and external factors that could impact your ability to implement your recommended change. Speaker’s notes should more fully explain how the factors you’ve identified would support or impede the implementation of your recommendations. Factors may be based on personal experience or on information you found in your research. If the identified factors come from the literature, provide reference citations to support your ideas.
NONPF Competencies: slide identifies at least two NONPF Competencies that are relevant to an evidence-based project related to your area of interest. Speaker’s notes should explain how the competencies relate to your area of interest. Provide support from at least one outside scholarly source (not the textbook or course lesson).
Conclusion: slide provides summary points of presentation. Speaker’s notes provide final comments on the topic.

The post Introduction: slide should identify concepts to be addressed and sections of the appeared first on homework handlers.

I neeed REVISION of the completed work. Here are some comments: 1. Avoid multipl

/in /by

I neeed REVISION of the completed work. Here are some comments:
1. Avoid multiple referencing, the supervisor is highly recommending ONE Reference only.
2. The supervisor strongly advise to remove reference before year 2010 and not to include book reference.
3. To take out all the Beadle Brown et al and all Bigby et al references. The articles does not relate to the topic which are – intellectual disability, oral care and healthcare workers.
4. The supervisor wants to add a definition of intellectual disabiliy, oral care and healthcare worker – nurses, healthcare assistants and social care worker.
5. Paper has no focus at all on oral care, intellectual disabilities and healthcare worker
6 Remove paragraph on laxatives – this is irrelevant
7. What is Wilson et al saying about the TREND – What are this TREND, explain clearly.
8 . The writer mentioned about Language and Speech, how does this relate to Oral care?
9. The writer mentioned about theoretical framework but it is very vague. How is this related to the research topic
10. The supervisor said that every headings in the background to the study has very poor facts. What is written under each headings are irrelevant.
11. To only use articles (i sent) that only relates to oral care among people with intellectual disabilities and what the healthcare workes knowledge, practices. There are loads of articles used that is irrelevant.
Oh yah, please tell the writer that the above recommendations where on top of what was already in the papers comment box.”
And these are the initial instructions:
The Title of Research Dissertation is: Healthcare Workers Knowledge and Practices of Oral Health Care in Intellectual Disability Residential Care Setting.
Background of study – 3000 words is required in order for me to secure an Ethical Approval – Please refer to the Instruction of Background of Study attached- Use Waldron et. al and reference and please utilise the rest of references provided. There has been a lot of research done on oral health care among people with intellectual disabilities but I haven’t seen specific for Healthcare workers for people with Intellectual Disabilities in Residential Care Setting, include how my research relate to other research that’s been done so far
I have searched this peer reviewed articles and journal in the CINAHL, PubMed Database, Cochrane. I have been reading the article and will continue to read and make notes to inform myself and to make sure that when I read the draft it relates to my research main aim and objectives. Additionally, it will allow me to make and give additional instruction if draft requires revision.
There has been a huge gap in the clinical practice in relation to Oral Health Care particularly among people with intellectual disabilities. In the area I work alone, in the last 20 years there has been poor emphasis on oral hygiene. Nursing Care should be approach in person-cantered and holistic manner.
Oral health is vital to well-being and quality of life for people with intellectual disabilities. However, health inequalities and disparities remain evident up to this day. Which is why there is a need for oral health promotion among people with intellectual disability.
Support and educational intervention is needed for staff in order to tackle the barriers and challenges in the provision of oral care.
A. People with Intellectual Disabilities have communication difficulties, mental health problems and behaviours of concerns, physical disabilities – where skills teaching becomes a major concern, cognitive and comprehension problems,
B. Staff lack awareness of the importance of oral care to the general well-being and the quality of life of people with Intellectual Disabilities, behaviour and attitudes towards oral care, some staff states “they refused oral care” that’s it no more follow-up nor any referrals made, lack of training, lack of knowledge on equal rights to health, etc.
There is a National Oral health Policy now in Ireland – reference this please when making the background of the Study – see attached instruction.
Oral Health problem is higher among people with Intellectual Disabilities than the general population. Healthcare professionals should received appropriate training in order to support people with ID.
Referencing should be in Harvard Style please. Refer to the link in the Instruction.
I have also attached the Critical essay done previously to make reference to why oral health promotion should be advocated. Please do not plagiarise.
I will be in touch if I remember something else.
Please help me.
Thank you.

The post I neeed REVISION of the completed work. Here are some comments:
1. Avoid multipl appeared first on homework handlers.