Why Remote Learning should be continued at Nassau Community College

GRABBER:
QUOTE FROM EXPERT CRITICIZING REMOTE LEARNING DURING COVID AND A SECOND QUOTE FROM ANOTHER EXPERT PRAISING IT.

OPPONENT’S THESIS:
Many teachers and students argue that remote learning should be discontinued at NCC because teachers and students have too many distractions at home, students work multiple jobs and now even longer hours to help their families even more now during COVID, and the teaching and the learning are not as high quality. TRANSITION SENTENCE: But this is more myth than fact. [YOUR SIDE’S THESIS:] While it is true that there are many distractions at home, there are more distractions in school and even before and between classes that not only waste time but drain both teachers’ and students’ energy. In addition, while it may be true some students are working longer hours, the fact is community college students often work multiple jobs to support their families and themselves and avoid crushing student loan debt. Finally, its is pure nonsense to say quality of education is lower. In fact, in many ways it is higher.

COMMON GROUND (1-2 pages) must focus on the time span of COVID and the impact nationwide on education at all le3vels for about 2-3 paragraphs, then switch to impact on public colleges and then in particular community colleges. Talk about what “remote learning” means in terms of the range of technology used by schools and the range of technology required of students. Then talk about NCC remote learning technology and what students needs for classes — you can use your own classes BUT DON’T SAY “I take… and I use….” — make sure you talk in the third person (students, they, those enrolled in classes…)

OPPONENT’S SIDE:
Start with first topic — put the first reason into “Topic sentence” form and then you can give your own logic and DETAILED examples of what distractions could mean. Paragraphs must NOT exceed 5 sentences each. Add experts comments and any statistics to back up the ideas you wrote.

Then do the same for each reason for the opponent.

Then switch to your side and do the same.

It is better to knock down the opponent after letting the opponent speak, by following up with your side’s response, but it is okay to save time and simply split the paper.

Contract Clause and Element of Capacity

Article I, section 10, clause 1 of the United States Constitution provides that No State shall … pass any … impairing the Obligation of Contracts … This is known as the contract clause, and shows just how important freedom of contract is to a fair and orderly society.

Yet, in this Unit, we’ve learned about an element of contract that impacts the ability of some people to enter contracts, the element of capacity.

Considering what you’ve learned about the element of capacity, and any research you complete to enhance your understanding of capacity, answer the following questions:

1. Do the limitations on contract imposed by the element of capacity make sense from a public policy perspective? What are we trying to achieve by limiting the rights of some people to contract?

2. Fully describe the differing outcomes for the following three contractual scenarios:

A. A minor who lives with his parents leases an apartment for a year. May the minor disaffirm after three months? What are the rights of the minor tenant and the landlord at the time the minor disaffirms?

B. A minor who does not have an adult to provide him shelter leases an apartment for a year. May the minor disaffirm after three months? What are the rights of the minor tenant and the landlord at the time the minor disaffirms? How is the resolution to this scenario different from the result in part A?

C. An adult leases an apartment for a year. May the adult disaffirm after three months? If the adult moves out of the apartment after three months, what are the rights of the adult tenant and the landlord at the time of the move out? How is the resolution to this scenario different from the result in part A and part B?

Write your answers to the above questions in a 1,000 word essay, double-spaced, and cite any sources that you use in APA style

150-200 word essay

D.dobbs on Natural right and the problem of aristotles defense of slavery is a must do.

D. Dobbs, “Natural Right and the Problem of Aristotle’s Defense of Slavery”. The Journal of Politics. 56.1 (1994)
https://www.marquette.edu/political-science/directory/documents/dobbs-natural-right.pdf
M.-H. Song, A Study on Aristotles theory of Slavery, in Y. Tory, D. Masaoki (eds), Forms of Control and Subordination in Antiquity,
R. Schlaifer, Greek theories of slavery from Homer to Aristotle, Harvard Studies in Classical Philology (1936), 165-204

write a 150/200-word report on the article you have read; the report must contain
a paragraph on the specific topic of the article, a paragraph on the primary sources the author
uses, a paragraph on the scholarship the author discusses and a paragraph on the authors
thesis

Medical aid in dying

It is a four page (at least one sentence on page 5) research paper on whether or not “medical aid in dying” should be legal in the United States.  In the last page you discuss whether it should be legal.  In the first 3 pages you need to include information that could help you make this decision.  Think of it as:  you know nothing about the topic.  What information do you think one should know before one could decide whether or not aid in dying should be legal?  For this paper, medical aid in dying is when a person is likely to die within six months and the person/patient would like the physician to give them a prescription for medicine that they could take to hasten their death.  The patient must be terminally ill and he must take the medication himself. 

There needs to be at least three quality references (e.g., peer reviewed/refereed articles or government documents).  There should be a reference page with complete information on these references. The reference page does not count as part of the four pages of text; neither does your name, date, etc.