ALL INSTRUCTIONS AND GUIDES TO COMPLETING THE ESSAY ARE BELOW IN THE ADDITIONAL MATERIALS.YOU MUST GO THROUGH EACH ATTACHMENT TO COMPLETE THE ESSAY CORRECTLY.FIRST READ ”Research Essay Prompt” the read the rest of the attached files to understand what is asked for the essay.
Choose a commercial aerospace business unit and identify a program it supports. Write an APA paper that provides a brief overview of the company, and the program it supports; List critical success factors associated to the programs strategic orientation to the host organization; Briefly identify the programs projects and processes required to produce services and products customers want; Outline who the stakeholders are and how the programs strategic objectives support the stakeholder profile. Identify risks associated to the program and provide a high level financial synopsis of the programs prospectus. Cite all references.
Finance Ratio Analysis and Discussion
1.Current Performance. Financial information from the two most recent quarterly reports of the firm are stated with a discussion of the implications on the firm.
2.Financial Ratio Analysis. Based on the information in the firms 10-K and/or Annual Report, the eight assigned ratios are computed, analyzed and the results discussed using any one of the methods below for comparison in order of importance as follows: (1) industry data and (2) two competitors with the same ratios for 3 years (2019, 2018, 2017). The analysis should also discuss the implications of the results on the firm.
3.Assessment of Risk and Return on Capital Budget. Based on the information in the firms most recent 10-K and/or Annual Report, 10-Q Report, paper identifies one or two long-term (fixedasset) projects being undertaken by the firm with a focused discussion on (1) how the project could add value and/or growth to the firm in the long run, (2) the potential risks of the project to the firm, including financial implications and (3) how the firm can mitigate any perceive risks.
10-K link:
Novalife:
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-19-000485/novalife20181231_10k.htm
I found this one for 2019
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-20-000605/novalife20191231_10k.htm
2020
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-18-000517/novalifestyle10k123117.htm
2018
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-17-000929/novalifestyle10k123116.htm
2017
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-16-004004/novalifestyle10k123115.htm
2016
https://sec.report/Document/0001185185-15-000622/novalifestyle10k123114.htm
2015
Wayfair:
Heres wayfair.com 2016
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1616707/000161670716000017/a2015-12x31form10xk.htm
Heres 2018
https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1616707/000161670718000087/a2017-12x31form10xk.htm
Heres 2019
https://s24.q4cdn.com/589059658/files/doc_financials/2019/ar/2019-Annual-Report.pdf
Heres 2017
https://s24.q4cdn.com/589059658/files/doc_financials/annual/2017/2017-Annual-Report.pdf
Essay on: Goldin and Mariathasan 2014 Pandemics and Health Risks
1. Identifying the article/chapter: Including the author(s) name, year of publication, title, place of publication (journal or book, pages, press).
2. Summary: Summary should address most or all of the following questions:
(1) What is the major question/problem addressed?
(2) What was the author(s)s theory/ hypothesis?
(3) Who or what was studied?
(4) What did the authors finds/results?
(5) How were the results interpreted? Were the theories/hypotheses supported? If not, what new hypotheses did the authors offer as potential explanations of the results.
(6) What next steps in the research process were proposed?
3. Evaluation: This portion should include your evaluative comments regarding the information and validity of the study. Comments about the style or how entertaining the study was are irrelevant and should be avoided. While writing your evaluation consider the following questions:
(1) Were the information/sources reliable and valid? (did it relate to the questions/problems/intent of the paper, and if they used a sample, was it big enough?)
(2) Are there potential confounding variables that were not addressed in the study?
(3) Was there a good correspondence between the evidence and the conclusions?
(4) Are there limitations to the study that the authors did not mention?
(5) How generalizable are the findings?
(6) What future research should be build based on the conclusions of this study?
4. Format:
(1) Margins: 1 inch all around
(2) Font: Arial size 11
(3) Line spacing: single space
(4) Word count: Minimum of 800 word and maximum of 1200 words
We are experienced and have access to ample research materials to guarantee quality A+ papers. Our Professional Writers can handle all subjects and deliver your papers on time.
For any questions, feedback, or comments, we have an ethical customer support team that is always waiting on the line for your inquiries.
Send us an E-mail: support@homeworkhandlers.com or Call us: +1 (518)-934-6741
