In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding.

/in /by

Executive Summary

In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. Write an executive summary (750-1,000 words) to present to the board, from which the board will make its decision to fund your program or project. Include the following:

  1. The purpose of the quality improvement initiative.
  2. The target population or audience.
  3. The benefits of the quality improvement initiative.
  4. The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative.
  5. The cost or budget justification.
  6. The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.

RUBRIC

Attempt Start Date: 12-Aug-2019 at 12:00:00 AM

Due Date: 18-Aug-2019 at 11:59:59 PM

Maximum Points: 140.0

Executive Summary

No of Criteria: 11 Achievement Levels: 5CriteriaAchievement LevelsDescriptionPercentageUnsatisfactory0.00 %Less Than Satisfactory75.00 %Satisfactory79.00 %Good89.00 %Excellent100.00 %Content80.0     Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative15.0The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is not provided.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Target Population or Audience13.0The target population or audience is not addressed.The target population or audience is incomplete, missing relevant information.The target population or audience is provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The target population or audience meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Benefits of Quality Improvement Initiative13.0The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are not provided.The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are incomplete, missing relevant information.The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meet all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Interprofessional Collaboration Required to Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative13.0The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is not discussed.The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is incomplete, missing relevant information.The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructionsThe interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to implement the quality improvement initiative is clearly discussed and meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Cost or Budget Justification13.0The cost or budget justification is not provided.The cost or budget justification is incomplete, missing relevant information.The cost or budget justification is provided and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail.The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the assignment, as indicated by the assignment instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Basis Upon Which the Program or Project Will Be Evaluated13.0The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is not provided.The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is incomplete, missing relevant information.The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the assignment instructions.The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated is provided in detail.The basis, upon which the quality improvement initiative will be evaluated as indicated by the assignment instructions, is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.Organization, Effectiveness, and Format20.0     Thesis Development and Purpose5.0Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.Paragraph Development and Transitions5.0Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. Organization is disjointed.Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree of organization is evident.Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose.There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other. Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. Paragraph structure is seamless.Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)5.0Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)2.0Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.All format elements are correct.Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)3.0Sources are not documented.Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.Total Percentage  100

The post In this assignment, you will propose a quality improvement initiative from your place of employment that could easily be implemented if approved. Assume you are presenting this program to the board for approval of funding. appeared first on Infinite Essays.

It is 10 pm and you make assessment rounds and find Bobby crying. You ask him what his pain level is. What pain scale are you using?

/in /by

It is 10 pm and you make assessment rounds and find Bobby crying. You ask him what his pain level is. What pain scale are you using?

He says he misses his family and wonders when they are going to come to get him and take him home? He relates his dad told him to be brave but he couldn’t stay with him since

Bobby was going to be in the hospital for such a long time and his dad had to work. He has 2 other brothers older than him. You also notice that his tray is untouched.

In addition to Erikson’s theory of development, children have fear of loss. What is Bobby’s fear?
(do not forget the interdisciplinary team members)

The post It is 10 pm and you make assessment rounds and find Bobby crying. You ask him what his pain level is. What pain scale are you using? appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of results, and Conclusion assignment.

/in /by

Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of results, and Conclusion assignment.

 

Purpose

This assignment provides the opportunity for the student to complete their MSN EBP proposal. This assignment includes the final sections of the proposal which are data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO #1. Integrate evidence-based practice and research to support advancement of holistic nursing care in diverse healthcare settings. (PO # 1)

CO #2. Integrate knowledge related to evidence-based practice and person-centered care to improve healthcare outcomes. (PO #2, 5)

CO #4. Develop knowledge related to research and evidence-based practice as a basis for designing and critiquing research studies. (PO 1, 2, 3, 5)

CO #5. Analyze research findings and evidence-based practice to advance holistic nursing care initiatives that promote positive healthcare outcomes. (PO 1, 2, 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 PM MT at the end of Week Seven

Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

  • Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
  • Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
  • Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

If the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

  • Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction
  • Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction
  • Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

Total Points: 150 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

For this assignment, the student will complete MSN EBP project proposal by including the final sections of data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion.

Criteria for Content

  1. The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for exceeding this length requirement.
  2. Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference pages must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6thedition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.
  3. The paper should be presented in the following ordered sections:
  • Title Page
  • Data collection
  • Analysis
  • Evaluation
  • Dissemination of Results
  • Conclusion
  • References

4. Data Collection: In this section, students provide a comprehensive and detailed description regarding how data are to be collected. The required content includes:

A. For quantitative design the required content includes:

  • Restate the PICO/PICo question.
  • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
  • Identify the data collection points
  • Explain the length of time for data collection
  • Explain all source(s) of data (i.e. self-report, questionnaires, structured observation, biophysiologic)
  • Describe 2 (two) methods that will be useful in enhancing data quality
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method.

B. For qualitative design the required content includes:

  • Restate the PICO/PICo question.
  • Describe the type of data to be collected (i.e. observation, interview, artifacts)
  • Provide a detailed explanation on how data collection will occur
  • Explain the data collection points
  • Explain the length of time for data collection
  • Explain the proposed method to achieve data saturation
  • Describe 2 (two) methods that would be used to enhance data quality
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected data collection method
  1. Analysis: In this section, students provide a detailed explanation on how data will be analyzed.
  2. For quantitative data the required content includes:
  • Discuss descriptive statistics and their use to explain the characteristics of the sample of this EBP proposal
  • Describe one type of inferential statistics and their use in this EBP proposal
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected analysis method
  1. For qualitative data the required content includes:
  • Explain how data analysis is organized
  • Discuss the use of themes and coding for this EBP proposal
  • Explain triangulation and its relevance to this qualitative design
  • Use scholarly references to provide information regarding selected analysis method
  1. Evaluation: In this section, students will present information regarding methods useful to objectively determine if outcomes from implementing this proposed EBP proposal would be positive for stakeholders as well as the nursing practice area reflected in their specialty track. The required content includes:
  • Describe how each of the stakeholders identified earlier in this EBP proposal will experience improved outcome(s) from implementing this project
  • Describe 2 (two) changes or improvements to nursing practice that may result in the your specialty track area at the micro level if this EBP project was to be implemented
  1. Dissemination of Results: In this section, students will identify specific methods that may be used to share the results from successful implementation of this EBP proposal. The required content includes:
  • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with stakeholders
  • Discuss how the results of this EBP project can be shared with members of your future practice area at the facility, community, state, and national levels
  1. Conclusion: In this section, the student will identify a summary of their EBP project as well as consider the potential contribution to their specialty track practice setting. The required content includes:
  • Provide a comprehensive summary of key points from this EBP proposal project
  • Provide a summary of the potential contributions of this EBP proposal project to your specialty track practice and identified practice setting

8. Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. The final sections of the proposal (data collection, analysis, evaluation, dissemination of results, and conclusion) should be a maximum of 15 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting this length requirement.
  2. Headings are required and listed in above. All headings should be formatted following APA requirements
  3. Title page, body of paper, reference page(s), and appendix must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6thedition of the manual.
  4. Provide all of your references; formatted in APA style, as reference page(s).

The post Data Collection, Analysis, Evaluation, Dissemination of results, and Conclusion assignment. appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Write a 5–6-page article on a controversial topic related to pharmacology. Explain appropriate use of pharmacology; the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and the use of pharmacology; and how the topic affects communities and organizations.

/in /by

Write a 5–6-page article on a controversial topic related to pharmacology. Explain appropriate use of pharmacology; the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and the use of pharmacology; and how the topic affects communities and organizations. Describe inequities regarding access to pharmacological treatments.

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Show Less

  • Competency 1: Apply practice guidelines and standards of evidence-based practice related to pharmacology for safe and effective nursing practice.
    • Explain the appropriate use of pharmacology.
  • Competency 2: Explain the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and the appropriate use of pharmacology and psychopharmacology.
    • Explain the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and the use of pharmacology.
    • Explain how pharmacology affects communities and organizations.
  • Competency 3: Apply the principles and practices of cultural competence with regard to pharmacological interventions.
    • Describe inequities regarding access to pharmacology.
  • Competency 4: Communicate in a manner that is scholarly, professional, and consistent with expectations of a nursing professional.
    • Write content clearly and logically with correct use of grammar, punctuation, and mechanics.
    • Correctly format paper, citations, and references using current APA style.

In your professional nursing practice, you will likely encounter both patients and coworkers whose personal or cultural views on pharmacology may be quite different from your own. Understanding the most current research on pharmacological topics will help you make informed choices.

For this assessment, imagine your supervisor asks you to write an article on a controversial topic for the organization’s monthly newsletter in which you review the most recent research on the topic. She stresses you must present a balanced overview and equally address the pros and cons of the topic.

Preparation

Complete the following as you prepare to write your article:

  1. Choose a topic from the list below:
    • The use of medical marijuana.
    • The use of complementary and alternative medicines (CAM) versus traditional Western medicine.
    • Experimental drug programs and disease management.
    • Mandated vaccinations for children and the implications for parental choice not to vaccinate.
  2. Search the Capella library and the Internet to locate peer-reviewed research articles on your selected topic. The information you use to support your work in this assessment must be as recent as possible.

Note: These are very broad topics. Limit your work to the scope of your practice and be mindful of the page-length requirements.

Requirements

Once you have identified your topic, organize your article as you wish. Be sure to include the following:

  • Explain the appropriate use of the pharmacology related to the topic. Include elements such as diseases or health concerns associated with the topic and the efficacy and applicability of the pharmacology.
  • Explain the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and use of the pharmacology related to the topic. Remember to address both the benefits and limitations of the pharmacology in terms of specific diseases and populations.
  • Explain how the topic affects both the community and the organization in terms of promoting health and wellness.
  • Describe any inequities regarding access to the pharmacology related to the topic. Is access limited to specific groups or populations? Who determines access? On what is it based? Does access influence choice?

Follow APA guidelines to format this assessment. Include a title page and reference page.

Additional Requirements

  • Number of pages: 5–6 (no more than 7).
  • At least 4 current scholarly or professional resources.
  • Times New Roman, 12 point, double-spaced font.

The post Write a 5–6-page article on a controversial topic related to pharmacology. Explain appropriate use of pharmacology; the relationship between quality patient outcomes, patient safety, and the use of pharmacology; and how the topic affects communities and organizations. appeared first on Infinite Essays.