This Forum Discussion assignment is designed to provide an opportunity for each student to explore the economic and health policy perspective of a selected healthcare issue that drives healthcare delivery and/or strategic resource allocation. 

/in /by

This Forum Discussion assignment is designed to provide an opportunity for each student to explore the economic and health policy perspective of a selected healthcare issue that drives healthcare delivery and/or strategic resource allocation.

 

Please the grading rubric below and include headings.

Each student should search the literature and select a topic related to nursing informatics to serve as the topic of your initial post for this discussion.

 

 

  • 1.Discuss the background and significance of the topic..
  • 2.Discuss the selected nursing informatics topic in relation to healthcare  and the opportunities and challenges in healthcare and the benefits of the electronic health record on quality and safety in providing patient care
  • 3.APA errors, grammatical errors, headings incorrect spelling, over the limit, failure to follow instructions, or   past due date.

Each student will post an initial discussion post of 400- 500 words in the forum.  Support your discussion with at least 1 references in APA style in the initial discussion post

 

The post This Forum Discussion assignment is designed to provide an opportunity for each student to explore the economic and health policy perspective of a selected healthcare issue that drives healthcare delivery and/or strategic resource allocation.  appeared first on Infinite Essays.

How does the use of information technology in health care affect reimbursement for nursing care, evidence-based practice, and the use of data for population health?

/in /by

 

How does the use of information technology in health care affect reimbursement for nursing care, evidence-based practice, and the use of data for population health?

Write a 300 – word paper using APA Format.

The post How does the use of information technology in health care affect reimbursement for nursing care, evidence-based practice, and the use of data for population health? appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Does your cultural background influence your views about the effectiveness of leaders who show great deal of interpersonal sensitivity?

/in /by

Does your cultural background influence your views about the effectiveness of leaders who show great deal of interpersonal sensitivity? Explain you answer with detail using examples.

Use 250 Words.

The post Does your cultural background influence your views about the effectiveness of leaders who show great deal of interpersonal sensitivity? appeared first on Infinite Essays.

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

/in /by

Rubric Detail

A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: 12 Week Hybrid Discussion Rubric

 

  • Grid View
  • List View
Excellent Satisfactory Needs Improvement
Initial Post: Content/Comprehension Points: 5 (28.57142%) Points Range: 4 (22.85714%) – 5 (28.57142%) Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed. Feedback:
Initial Post: Timeliness Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits initial post by deadline. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Submits initial post one to three days late. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits initial post after three days. Feedback:
Initial Post: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Engagement/Classroom Interaction Points: 4.25 (24.28571%) Points Range: 4 (22.85714%) – 4.5 (25.71428%) Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Timeliness Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits peer response posts by deadline. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits peer response posts late. Feedback:
Peer Responses: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics Points: 2 (11.42857%) Points Range: 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Initial Post: Content/Comprehension–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 4 (22.85714%) – 5 (28.57142%) Post demonstrates depth of understanding of course content; Addresses discussion prompt completely; offers clear point of view and detail. Satisfactory 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Post demonstrates adequate depth of understanding, but does not address all of discussion prompt; point of view is somewhat unclear and detail is limited. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post does not demonstrate depth of understanding of course content; Discussion prompt is minimally addressed; Point of view is unclear and detail is under-developed. Feedback:

Initial Post: Timeliness–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits initial post by deadline. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Submits initial post one to three days late. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits initial post after three days. Feedback:

Initial Post: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Post has 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Post has 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Engagement/Classroom Interaction–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 4 (22.85714%) – 4.5 (25.71428%) Submits required number of response posts; Responses extend the discussion by making connections, relating to others’ ideas and adding supporting detail. Satisfactory 2 (11.42857%) – 3 (17.14285%) Submits required number of response posts; Some connections are made with relevant explanation and detail. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 1 (5.71428%) Responses are not submitted; Responses are generic, limited, do not extend the discussion or add detail. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Timeliness–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Submits peer response posts by deadline. Satisfactory 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%)   Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Submits peer response posts late. Feedback:

Peer Responses: Spelling/Grammar/Mechanics–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 2 (11.42857%) – 2 (11.42857%) Posts have 0-1 spelling or grammatical errors; Properly cites work in APA format where required. Satisfactory 1 (5.71428%) – 1 (5.71428%) Posts have 2-3 spelling or grammatical errors; Cites work in APA format where required with few errors. Needs Improvement 0 (0.00%) – 0 (0.00%) Posts have 4 or more spelling or grammatical errors; Does not cite work where required. Feedback: Raw Total: 17.25 (of 17.5)

Feedback to Learner

The post A rubric lists grading criteria that instructors use to evaluate student work. Your instructor linked a rubric to this item and made it available to you. Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout. appeared first on Infinite Essays.