Develop a program and write a funding proposal in 2500 words. You will need to choose a public health issue from the National Health Priority Areas (My topic is Dementia in Australia);  For this dementia people in Australia, write a funding proposal which addresses the points below.

Please make sure you make it according to Australian population and include all the points in that.

Develop a program and write a funding proposal in 2500 words. You will need to choose a public health issue from the National Health Priority Areas (My topic is Dementia in Australia);  For this dementia people in Australia, write a funding proposal which addresses the points below. You should structure your plan using headings and subheadings. Your proposal should include the following project details:

  1. Project name
  2. Expected length of the project
  3. Population target
    • A brief description of the characteristics of your target population (e.g., CALD, Indigenous, disability, other)
  4. A project summary or abstract
  • Briefly outline who the program is designed for, the goals and objectives of the project, the strategies and the evaluation plan.
  1. Background
    • Describe the rationale for your intervention and how you determined what is needed. In this section you will also identify the determinants for this particular issue.
  2. Project objectives and goals
  3. Project plan
    • Outline the program objectives and the key strategies and activities you are proposing.
  4. Evaluation plan
    • Describe each phase of evaluation for your program.

The post Develop a program and write a funding proposal in 2500 words. You will need to choose a public health issue from the National Health Priority Areas (My topic is Dementia in Australia);  For this dementia people in Australia, write a funding proposal which addresses the points below. appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Funding proposal Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Marking criteria

Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Funding proposal Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Marking criteria

Facets of Inquiry Fail If you were ticked here, this facet of research needs work

Pass If you were ticked here, this facet of research was OK but could be improved

Credit If you were ticked here, this facet of research is good

Distinction If you were ticked here, this facet of research is well done

High Distinction If you were ticked here, this facet of research is excellent

Weighting

A. Clarify purpose of and rationale for the project.

□ The rationale for the project was poorly described and not supported by evidence. The purpose of the project was not stated, or not clearly stated. The abstract did not summarise the goals, objectives or strategies of the project.

□ The rationale for the project was described, and some aspects were supported by evidence. The purpose of the project was stated but not clearly stated. The abstract summarised the goals, objectives and strategies of the project.

□ The rationale for the project was described, and supported by evidence. The purpose of the project was clearly stated. The abstract summarised the goals, objectives and strategies of the project.

□ The rationale for the project was well described, and supported by evidence. The purpose of the project was clearly stated. The abstract summarised the goals, objectives or strategies and the project.

□ The rationale for the project was extremely well written and described in detail, and supported by evidence. The purpose of the project was clearly stated. The abstract summarised the goals, objectives and strategies of the project.

20%

B. Outline informed and strategies and activities in your project plan, evaluation plan and funding.

□ The project plan and the key objectives and strategies were poorly described and the evaluation plan was poorly outlined.

□ The project plan and the key objectives and strategies were described and there was adequate detail of the evaluation plan.

□ The project plan and the key objectives and strategies were well described and evaluation plan showed a good level of detail and was appropriately matched to the program plan.

□ The project plan and the key objectives and strategies were very well described and evaluation plan was clear and well matched to the program plan.

□ The project plan and the key objectives and strategies were extremely well described and evaluation plan was excellent.

30%

C. Evaluate information/ critical appraisal

□ The project did not appear to be evidence-based, and there was very little indication of critical appraisal of the literature in the area.

□ The project did appear to be evidence-based, and there was some critical appraisal of the literature in the area.

□ It was clear that the program was evidence- based, and there was good critical appraisal of the literature in the area.

□ It was very clear that the program was evidence- based, and there was very good critical appraisal of the literature in the area.

□ The evidence-base of the program was extremely well described and the critical appraisal of the relevant literature was clearly evident.

30%

 

 

D. Organise information and communicate knowledge, demonstrating ability to adhere to prescribed structure.

□ The assignment did not cover all aspects of the to the proposal structure. The assignment was poorly written, and lacked coherence between and within sections. □ The assignment exceeded the word count by more than 10%, and/or a word count is not provided but it appears to exceed the word count by more than 10%.

□ The assignment covered all aspects of the to the proposal structure. The assignment was difficult to follow in some sections, and slightly lacked coherence between and within sections.

□ The assignment covered all aspects of the proposal structure adequately. The assignment was written well and demonstrated coherence between and within sections.

□ The assignment was well written, covering all aspects of the proposal structure well. It was coherent within and between paragraphs.

□ The assignment was exceptionally well written, covering all aspects of the proposal structure succinctly but with enough detail. □ The assignment was within 10% of the word count.

10%

E. Analyse & synthesise and integrate new knowledge throughout

□ The assignment poorly combined and integrated a range of sources of evidence and poorly or incorrectly related this to the project plan.

□ The assignment attempted to combine and integrate a range of sources of evidence and attempted to relate this to the project plan.

□ The assignment has combined and integrated a range of sources of evidence and there was a good attempt to relate to the project plan.

□ The assignment has combined and integrated a range of sources of evidence well and this is well reflected in the project plan.

□ The assignment has combined and integrated a range of sources of evidence well and this is extremely well reflected in the project plan.

5%

F. Apply discipline conventions and “publication” requirements

□ Sources within the assignment were not acknowledged. □ The assignment did not include a reference list.

□ Most of the sources within the assignment were acknowledged partially and/or incorrectly. □ The reference list is provided but with many mistakes or is incomplete.

□ All sources within the assignment were acknowledged partially and/or incorrectly. □ The reference list provided had some mistakes.

□ The assignment acknowledged all sources fully and correctly. □ The assignment included a reference list, including all sources and mostly consistently followed an established referencing style.

□ The assignment acknowledged all sources fully and correctly, differentiating between quotations and paraphrasing. □ The assignment included a reference list, including all sources and consistently followed an established referencing style.

5%

Total out of 100

The post Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Funding proposal Promoting Health in Individuals and Populations Assignment 2: Marking criteria appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on the topic identified in Module 1. Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study.

Qualitative Research

Write a fully developed and detailed APA essay addressing each of the following points/questions. There is no required word count; be sure to completely answer all the questions for each question in detail. Separate each section in your paper with a clear heading that allows your professor to know which bullet you are addressing in that section of your paper. Support your ideas with at least one (1) source using citations in your essay. Make sure to cite using the APA writing style for the essay. The cover page and reference page are required. Review the rubric criteria for this assignment.

Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on the topic identified in Module 1. Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study.

Respond to the overview questions for the critical appraisal of qualitative studies, including:

  • What type of qualitative research design was utilized to conduct the study?
  • Are the results valid/trustworthy and credible?
  • How were the participants chosen?
  • How were accuracy and completeness of data assured?
  • How plausible/believable are the results?
  • Are implications of the research stated?
  • May new insights increase sensitivity to others’ needs?
  • May understandings enhance situational competence?
  • What is the effect on the reader?
  • Are the results plausible and believable?
  • Is the reader imaginatively drawn to the experience?
  • What are the results of the study?
  • Does the research approach fit the purpose of the study?
  • How does the researcher identify the study approach?
  • Are the data collection and analysis techniques appropriate?
  • Is the significance/importance of the study explicit?
  • Does the literature support a need for the study?
  • What is the study’s potential contribution?
  • Is the sampling clear and guided by study needs?
  • Does the researcher control selection of the sample?
  • Do sample size and composition reflect the study needs?
  • Is the phenomenon (human experience) clearly identified?
  • Are data collection procedures clear?
  • Are sources and means of verifying data explicit?
  • Are researcher roles and activities explained?
  • Are data analysis procedures described?
  • Does analysis guide directions of sampling when it ends?
  • Are data management processes described?
  • What are the reported results (descriptive or interpretation)?
  • How are specific findings presented?
  • Are the data meanings derived from data described in context?
  • Does the writing effectively promote understanding?
  • Will the results help me care for my patients?
  • Are the results relevant to persons in similar situations?
  • Are the results relevant to patient values and/or circumstances?
  • How may the results be applied to clinical practice?

Please be sure to answer the questions thoroughly using complete sentences and APA format. Explain responses to yes/no questions in detail by presenting information found in the study to support your response.

Provide a reference for the article according to APA format and a copy of the article.

Assignment Expectations:

Length: Clearly and fully answer all questions; attach a copy of the article
Structure: Include a title page and reference page in APA format. Your essay must include an introduction and a conclusion.

The post Conduct a literature search to select a qualitative research study on the topic identified in Module 1. Conduct an initial critical appraisal of the study. appeared first on Infinite Essays.

Discuss how genetic and genomics can play a role in a demand for new health services and how it may impact health care expenditures in the aging population. Give one example.

I need about 100-120 words for each question and references as well

Topic: Aging

DQ 1

Discuss how genetic and genomics can play a role in a demand for new health services and how it may impact health care expenditures in the aging population. Give one example.

DQ 2

Describe one method that includes using evidence-based data to support a new or innovative ways to care for the aging now or in the future. How will it impact care and what are the anticipated outcomes?

Topic: Chronic Disease

DQ 1

Discuss how genetic and genomics can play a role in a demand for new health services and how it may impact health care expenditures in the chronic disease population. Give one example.

DQ 2

Describe one method that includes using evidence-based data to support a new or innovative way to care for those with chronic disease now or in the future. How will it impact care and what are the anticipated outcomes?

Topic: Ethical and Legal Considerations

DQ 1

Choose one recent (within last 2 years) news story about genetic or genomic technology. Describe the issue presented. From the perspective as an RN or APRN, describe the ethical, cultural, religious, legal, fiscal, and societal implication.

DQ 2

Describe two issues that undermine the rights of clients in genetic- and genomic-related decision making and action. Discuss a potential solution for each as well as your role in this issue as the patient advocate.

The post Discuss how genetic and genomics can play a role in a demand for new health services and how it may impact health care expenditures in the aging population. Give one example. appeared first on Infinite Essays.